NOTE:- Advise available for all countries laws vis-a-vis adultery & divorce so if you want divorce from your adulterous wife & want to have Consultation with ATUR CHATUR by paying him the consultation fees then contact him at +91-9873540498 & must also leave an email at ATURCHATUR@YAHOO.COM
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
manhelpdelhi.blogspot.com provides
expert Man Help for wife problems through atur chatur counselling so please
read disclaimer & terms conditions at fight
false 498a & adultery before
reading further. We do not provide legal opinion/ legal advise or anything like
that. We provide atur chatur counselling help for Punjab Delhi Haryana UP
Rajasthan & NRI's victims of false cases 498a Domestic Violence & the
likes. We try to provide counselling to the best of our knowledge which was
gained while self in false cases & this is also our fight against gender
discrimination in India. This is also a fight for equality & to promote
happiness & happy families & for the protection of Indian culture &
family values. MAN HELP for all Areas of PITAMPURA, Paschim Vihar, ROHINI,
Peera Garhi, Prashant Vihar, Saraswati Vihar, Bhera Enclave, West Enclave,
Punjabi Bagh, Meera Bagh, Madhuban Chowk. We provide atur chatur counselling
guidance to the best of our knowledge. We charge meeting fees for around one
hour talking & suggesting RTI & other methods which can help in
breakdown of the false cases on u & entire family. we might asap also
arrange classes on global level to educate the masses. Currently, One-to-One
counselling service is being provided only to those who need for themselves at
our location or at your Home at a premium fees.
About Us:
Ex-Lecturer in University of
Delhi who was trapped in false matrimonial litigations & who had no other option
to fight against the corrupt or wrong or unethical or gender discrimination or
connivance or false cases or may be all together
We are Committed to:
Atur Chatur Couselling r/w the
disclaimer & terms at above said links tries our best to provide you the
best MAN HELP which might help you devise strategy to fight your own situation.
Our Services:
Our services basically are
trying our best to share our knowledge with you r/w the below disclaimer &
also r/w those at the two links specified above. Since no one is perfect. We
are also not an exception. We however try our best to pour the maximum of
knowledge that we have gained while fighting for false cases & social
stigma on entire family due to these false cases.
Man Help, Man Celll,
Atur Chatur Counselling & One-to-One Counselling classes
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NOTE:- Advise available for all countries laws vis-a-vis adultery & divorce so if you want divorce from your adulterous wife & want to have Consultation with ATUR CHATUR by paying him the consultation fees then contact him at +91-9873540498 & must also leave an email at ATURCHATUR@YAHOO.COM
41A FRAUD
BY POLICE
To
Dated:- 10/02/2016
Public Information
Officer,
Delhi Police Headquarters,
M.S.O. Building, I.P.Estate,
New Delhi-110002
Sub:- Request for information u/s 6 & 7
of RTI Act 2005
Respected Sir/ Madam,
It is respectfully submitted that at around 7:15pm on 08/02/2016 a one page
non-diarized letter (annexed for your kind perusal) was handed over to my
family where it was written that on 09/02/2016 i.e., on very next day at
10:30pm (i.e., within less than 24 hours) I need to reach the PS Rohini &
thereby to give my statement/ explanation/ reply. That I am not able to
understand whether this non-diarized & non-dated letter has been sent from
the PS Rohini or not as there is no diary number or reference number on it
& even no date of issue is written on this letter (annexed for your kind
perusal). It is requested that following information may kindly be supplied under
RTI Act 2005:-
1. Kindly supply me the information whether this
non-diarized & non-dated letter has been issued by PS Rohini or not.
2. Kindly supply me the name of the current IO in
FIR no. 599/14 with PS Rohini and all the dates / time period/s of his
association with this FIR.
3. Kindly supply me the date of issue of this
letter.
4. Kindly supply me the diary number &/or
file number &/or file reference number with respect to which this letter
was sent/ issued to me.
5. Kindly supply me the total number of pages
which were sent/ issued to me.
6. Kindly supply me the name of the person or
officer, with designation, rank, belt number who was given the duty to deliver
this letter to me.
7. Kindly supply me the name of my family member
who took receiving of this letter issued in my name.
8. Kindly supply me the certified photocopy of
the receiving which my family member gave to that person/ officer who delivered
this letter to my family member.
9. Kindly supply me the certified photocopy of
all the pages which that person/ officer was given the duty to deliver to me.
10. Kindly supply me the certified copy of the
correct letter mentioning the file number or file referencing number or diary
number alongwith the date of issue from your office viz., PS Rohini.
11. Kindly supply me the name of all the IO's
associated with the FIR no. 599/14 with PS Rohini.
12. Kindly supply me the date or time period for
which each such IO as above handled the FIR no. 599/14 with PS Rohini.
13. Kindly supply me the date/ time period during
which the IO Sh. Surveen Kumar Ji remained as an IO for FIR no. 599/14 with PS
Rohini.
14. Kindly supply me the certified photocopy of
reasons on record for change of IO.
15. Kindly supply me the certified photocopy of
reasons on record for change of all the IO's associated in any manner with FIR
no. 599/14 with PS Rohini.
16. That as per Arnesh Kumar Judgment, Notice of
appearance in terms of section 41A of CrPC be served on the accused within two
weeks from the date of institution of the case, which may be extended by the
Superintendent of Police of the District for the reasons to be recorded in
writing. Hence, kindly supply me the certified photocopy of the reasons on
record for extension of this time period.
17. Kindly supply me the name & rank of the
officer who extended this time period as above.
18. Kindly supply me all the dates when this time
period as above was extended.
19. Kindly supply me the certified photocopy of
the reasons on record for extension of this time period on all such dates if
such time extension as above was extended more than one time.
20. Kindly supply me the information whether the
accused against whom 41A Notice has been served is allowed to submit his
statement/ explanation/ reply in written or not.
21. Kindly supply me the extract/copy of all those
document/ Ordinance/ Regulation/ rules/ policy/ code/ circular/ norms/
directives/ notifications/ judgment/ guidelines/ standing instructions/ other
related documents containing the powers/ duty of IO to ask the complainant to
admit or deny the documents submitted by the accused.
22. Kindly supply me the extract/copy of all those
document/ Ordinance/ Regulation/ rules/ policy/ code/ circular/ norms/
directives/ notifications/ judgment/ guidelines/ standing instructions/ other
related documents containing the powers/ duty of IO to close the FIR if the
complainant does not cooperate with the investigation.
23. Kindly supply me the extract/copy of all those
document/ Ordinance/ Regulation/ rules/ policy/ code/ circular/ norms/
directives/ notifications/ judgment/ guidelines/ standing instructions/ other
related documents containing the powers/ duty of IO to lodge a FIR against the
complainant if during investigation it comes to the notice of the IO that the
complainant lodged a false FIR against the accused.
24. Kindly supply me the extract/copy of all those
document/ Ordinance/ Regulation/ rules/ policy/ code/ circular/ norms/
directives/ notifications/ judgment/ guidelines/ standing instructions/ other
related documents containing the powers/ duty of IO to issue a notice under
CrPC 91 to the complainant to call for the documents in support of her FIR.
25. Kindly supply me the information whether any
CrPC 91 notice was issued to the complainant or not. This information is
requested to be supplied through a yes or no only.
26. Kindly supply me all the dates when such CrPC
91 notice was issued to the complainant.
27. Kindly supply the certified copy of reasons on
record for calling the accused mentioned within the annexed letter after a long
gap of around two years after registration of FIR.
28. Kindly supply the certified copy of reasons on
record for calling the accused mentioned within the annexed letter by giving
him less than 24 hours notice.
29. Kindly supply the certified copy of reasons on
record for issuing of 41A notice to the accused by an unknown IO.
LIFE & LIBERTY
CLAUSE :- The requisite
information is requested to be furnished within 48 hrs as per section 7(1) of
RTI Act 2005 as the information also concerns life and liberty as applicable
vide Article 21 of Constitution of India r/w judgment in case of Sheela Barse
V. State of Maharashtra AIR 1983 SC 378
I am sending a Blank
Postal Order no. 32F 084549 of Rs. 10 dated 10/02/2016 is
attached herewith. Kindly fill the PIO details as it is the duty
of PIO to provide reasonable assistance u/s 5 (3) of
the RTI act to applicant. The requested information shall be supplied
free of charge in case the same could not be supplied within 30 days u/s 7(6)
of RTI Act 2005. Kindly provide the information to each point separately.
Please do not club the information to the points even if the information is
repeated.
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o Q-7/77, GF,
Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Phone: 09873540498
Phone: 09873540498
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
CONTEMPT OF COURT BY COPS
To Dated 29/02/2016
Hon’ble Ms. G. Rohini Ji
O/o Hon’ble CHIEF JUSTICE (DHC),
Delhi High Court, Sher Shah Road,
New Delhi-110003
Sub:- Complaint Against SHO Rohini North East
Delhi for Contempt of Court to be instituted before the High Court having
territorial jurisdiction i.e., before the Hon’ble Delhi High Court & also
departmental action against SHO Rohini r/w Arnesh Kumar Vs State of Bihar
judgment dated 02/07/2014
Respected Sir,
(1) As per the
reference number (annexed for your kind perusal)
No.3/5/2008-Judl.Cell
Government of India/ Bharat Sarkar
Ministry of Home Affairs/ Grih
Mantralaya
dated 11 JUL 2014
as per the above reference number the
Ministry of Home Affairs issued an advisory with the subject Advisory on
measures to be taken by the States/UTs to curb the misuse of section 498-A of
the Indian Penal Code- regarding which reads as follows:-
The Government has, from time to time,
issued advisories on measures to be taken by the States/UTs to curb the misuse
of section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code.
2. On 02.07.2014 the Hon’ble Supreme
Court, in the case of Arnesh Kumar Vs State of Bihar and Anr. (copy
enclosed), observed that there is a phenomenal increase in matrimonial
disputes in recent years and the fact that section 498-A is a cognizable and
non bailable offence has lent it a dubious place of pride amongst the
provisions that are used as weapons rather than shields by disgruntled wives.
The Supreme Court has observed the following:
i) All the State Governments to
instruct its police officers not to automatically arrest when a case under
Section 498-A of the IPC is registered but to satisfy themselves about the
necessity for arrest under the parameters laid down above flowing from Section
41, Cr.PC;
ii) All police officers be provided
with a check list containing specified sub-clauses under Section 41(1)(b)(ii);
iii) The police officer shall forward
the check list duly filed and furnish the reasons and materials which
necessitated the arrest, while forwarding/producing the accused before the
Magistrate for further detention;
iv) The Magistrate while authorising
detention of the accused shall peruse the report furnished by the police
officer in terms aforesaid and only after recording its satisfaction, the
Magistrate will authorise detention;
v) The decision not to arrest an
accused, be forwarded to the Magistrate within two weeks from the date of the
institution of the case with a copy to the Magistrate which may be extended by
the Superintendent of police of the district for the reasons to be recorded in
writing;
vi) Notice of appearance in terms of
Section 41A of Cr.PC be served on the accused within two weeks from the date of
institution of the case, which may be extended by the Superintendent of Police
of the District for the reasons to be recorded in writing;
vii) Failure to comply with the
directions aforesaid shall apart from rendering the police officers concerned
liable for departmental action, they shall also be liable to be punished for
contempt of court to be instituted before High Court having territorial
jurisdiction.
viii) Authorising detention without
recording reasons as aforesaid by the judicial Magistrate concerned shall be
liable for departmental action by the appropriate High Court.
3. The Hon’ble Court has directed that
a copy of the judgment should be forwarded to the Chief Secretaries as also the
Directors General of Police of all the State Governments and the Union
Territories and the Registrar General of all the High Courts for onward
transmission and ensuring its compliance.
4. All the State Governments/UT
Administrations are requested to take effective measures to scrupulously
enforce the directions/order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court as also the
advisories issued by the Government of India from time to time.
5. The receipt of this letter may
kindly be acknowledged.
Yours Faithfully
(J. P. Agrawal)
Joint Secretary (Judicial)
Ph No. 23438113
(2) That it is most
humbly & respectfully submitted that the Hon’ble SHO is in Contempt of the
above advisory viz., vi) Notice of appearance in terms of Section 41A of
Cr.PC be served on the accused within two weeks from the date of institution of
the case, which may be extended by the Superintendent of Police of the District
for the reasons to be recorded in writing; because I filed an RTI (annexed
for your kind perusal) and within point no.16, 17, 18 & 19 thereof I asked
the following questions:-
16.
That as per Arnesh Kumar Judgment, Notice of appearance in terms of section 41A
of CrPC be served on the accused within two weeks from the date of institution
of the case, which may be extended by the Superintendent of Police of the
District for the reasons to be recorded in writing. Hence, kindly supply me the
certified photocopy of the reasons on record for extension of this time period.
17.
Kindly supply me the name & rank of the officer who extended this time
period as above.
18.
Kindly supply me all the dates when this time period as above was extended.
19.
Kindly supply me the certified photocopy of the reasons on record for extension
of this time period on all such dates if such time extension as above was
extended more than one time.
But the Hon’ble SHO has written
answers to all these as N.A. which means Not Applicable (RTI Reply with
response by PIO is annexed for your kind perusal).
(3) That it is
respectfully submitted that this FIR No. 599/14 PS Rohini was registered in
February 2014 whereas the Arnesh Kumar Judgment & the above advisory was
enforced/ implemented thereafter in July 2014 but the undiarized & undated
41A Notice was sent around 18 months after this above advisory came into
enforcement/ implementation hence from July 2014 to Feb’2016 there was no
extension of time period as per the SHO’s own admission through the above RTI
Reply (annexed) hence this undiarized & undated 41A Notice (annexed for
your kind perusal) which was sent to me was probably sent in contempt of the
above advisory & also in contempt of the Arnesh Kumar Judgment.
PRAYER:-
Suitable Action in the light of above facts & circumstances.
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Phone: 09873540498
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Enclosed:-
1 Advisory No.3/5/2008-Judl.Cell
as discussed above by MHA dated 11 JUL 2014
2 RTI dated 07/02/2016 (as discussed
above)
3 RTI Reply by SHO through PIO concerned
(as discussed above)
4 Undiarized & Undated 41A Notice
(as discussed above)
UNFAIR & UNETHICAL INVESTIGATION
To Dated 10/02/2016
Commissioner of Police
Delhi Police Headquarters
M.S.O. Building,
I.P. Estate,
New Delhi - 110002
Sub:- Complaint Against Unfair & Unethical
Investigation in FIR no. 599 / 14 with PS Rohini
Respected Sir,
(1) That on 06/03/2013
the Hon’ble Court of District & Sessions Judge (N/W) Sh. Yuv Kumar Dilvaria
Ji vide Bail Application No. 1230 “ordered that five working days notice be
given to the applicant, prior to his arrest, if any case is registered on the
complaint of the complainant. Further more the applicant is directed to join
the investigation as & when required by the IO.” (annexed fo your kind
perusal)
(2) That thereafter
on 07/01/2014 the FIR no. 599/14 with PS Rohini was filed against my entire
family and an IO Sh. Jagdeep Kumar Ji was assigned the duty to investigate in
the matter who even met me in the year 2015 vis-a-vis the Hon’ble Court of Ld
MM Sh. Jeetender Kumar Ji, Room No. 315, Rohini Courts, Delhi where my
complaint against CAW Cell (Delhi Police) is ongoing due to forcibly taking of
signatures from me and other unethical practices.
(3) That there is
being done violation of law and misuse of investigation power by the police
& even the IO has been changed and I have been not informed the reason for
such manipulations or any other manipulations in the last two years.
(4) That why after a
long gap of two years I am being called & that too in a hurry by an unknown
IO.
(5) That the reason
of such long delay of two years in contacting me has not yet been communicated
to me.
(6) That the purpose
of investigation is to investigate a complaint & to check the veracity of
the complaint & also to call the respondent party to get his versions which
has not been done for the past two years hence why such a long delay.
(7) That the true reason
behind removing the IO & appointing a new IO has also not been informed to
me.
(8) That after two
years on 09/02/2016, 4:35pm I was suddenly called by an unknown S.I. Sh. Surinder
Singh Ji No. 1289-E Rohini regarding a FIR no. 599/14 dated 07/01/2014 u/s
498a/406/34/323/324/506/120-B/417/419 IPC. That it is the first time in the
last two years that I have heard from any I.O. in the above noted FIR no.
(9) That in this
regard it is pertinent to mention here that at around 4:25pm on 09/02/2016
i.e., yesterday a one page non-diarized letter (annexed for your kind perusal) was
handed over to my family where it was written that on 10/02/2016 i.e., on very
next day at 10:30am (i.e., within less than 24 hours) I need to reach the PS Rohini
& thereby to give my statement/ explanation/ reply.
(10)
That with regards to above para it is most humbly &
respectfully submitted that I do have a lot of proofs & evidences with me
which can prove the falsity of this FIR no. but I am currently on treatment for
my Bilateral Avascular Necrosis of Femoral Heads due to which I am unable to walk
smoothly and in this regard on 06/02/2016 the Doctor of Hon’ble Ram Manohar
Lohia Hospital (hereinafter referred as RML for brevity) advised me to undergo
certain tests to be fit for treatment (otherwise my life can be in danger) and
I referred him my Kidney Stone & other medical problems (annexed my
medicals for the month of December for your kind perusal). Even yesterday early
morning i.e., on 09/02/2016 I went to RML to get my test reports (annexed) &
even on coming Friday i.e., on 12/02/2016 I have to go RML for my ultrasound
& tests and this date was given to me on 06/02/2016 by RML by recording
into their computer which can be duly verified (annexed).
(11)
That if during my treatment I am required to submit my
replies/ proofs/ evidences etc then it might create a lot of mental pressure on
me which might affect my recovery from my illness as I also have my other family
responsibilities including taking care of my mother who is unable to walk &
my septuagenarian father who has a history of multiple heart attacks & is
suffering from respiratory illness which has aggravated in winter.
(12)
That in this regard it is also most humbly submitted
that I deny all the allegations by the complainant & that she is behaving
abruptly as she is the influence of others. Also this case is full of wild
& vague allegations & is filled with after thoughts & concocted
stories. And that it is the complainant who herself does not wants to live with
the husband despite the never ending efforts of the husband to unite &
these false cases have been used to extract money from me which is called as
legal terrorism & these false cases & illegal designs have been made to
achieve her oblique motive of seeking divorce which I can prove through my
submissions (most of which are already in my WS before another court) &
that she herself has set up her own separate domicile & identity for which
I have ample proofs & I need time to prepare those after my current
treatment which is expected to be completed by last week of March hopefully but
if in case I am not given enough time to prepare my statements/ explanations
etc then in that case I would request that my entire Written Statement to the
complainant’s false complaint under the Domestic Violence Act which I submitted
on date 12/03/2015 to Hon’ble MM Ms. Sunaina Bala Tevaria which is currently
with Hon’ble MM Ms. Devati Rai Magaria may kindly be considered (which can be
submitted as & when required).
It is therefore most humbly requested
before your esteemed & Hon’ble authority to kindly issue suitable
directions to PS Rohini or other relevant authority as your esteemed authority
deems fit & proper in the interest of justice & fair play so that I am
given enough time to give my evidences/ proofs/ reply/ statements/ evidences
etc after my tests & treatment which will be completed by end of March
hopefully in the light of above mentioned facts & circumstances and to also
kindly inform me the true reasons behind sudden change of IO & also the
true reasons behind two years delay in investigation in the interest of justice
& fair play.
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email:
aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
Phone: 09873540498
RTI - UNFAIR INVESTIGATION
To
Dated 03/03/2016
Public Information
Officer
O/o Hon’ble District
Judge (North-West),
Rohini Courts
Complex,
New Delhi-110085
Sub:- Request for information u/s 6 & 7
of RTI Act 2005.
I filed
a COMPLAINT AGAINST UNFAIR & UNETHICAL INVESTIGATION IN FIR NO. 599 /
14 WITH PS ROHINI to Hon’ble Sh. Supreet Singh Ji, O/o Hon’ble District
Judge (North-East District), Rohini Courts Complex, New Delhi-110085 on 10/02/2016
vide India Post (speed post) ED959212345IN. I request the
following information under Right to Information ACT’2005 viz.,
1.
Kindly supply me the diary number for
this complaint.
2.
Kindly supply me the case no.
allotted to this complaint.
3.
Kindly supply me the name, designation
of the one/ two/ three officers to whom this case/ complaint has been allotted.
4.
Kindly supply the name, designation
of all officers of your office concerned/ related to this case/ complaint in
any manner.
5.
Kindly supply the certified copy of
action taken report.
6.
Kindly supply the process to attend
the hearing/s in this case no.
I am
sending two Blank Postal Orders no. 32F
083452 of Rs. 10 dated 28/02/2016
are attached herewith. Kindly fill the PIO details as it is the duty
of PIO to provide reasonable assistance u/s 5 (3) of
the RTI act to applicant. The requested information shall be supplied
free of charge in case the same could not be supplied within 30 days u/s 7(6)
of RTI Act 2005. Kindly provide the information to each point separately.
Please do not club the information to the points even if the information is
repeated.
LIFE & LIBERTY
CLAUSE
:- The requisite information shall be furnished within 48 hrs as per section
7(1) of RTI Act 2005 as the information also concerns life and liberty as
applicable vide Article 21 of Constitution of India r/w judgment in case of
Sheela Barse V. State of Maharashtra AIR 1983 SC 378
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o
Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
FAA calls RTI applicant in contravention of RTI Rules 2005
To Dated
Joint Commissioner
of Income Tax ,
RANGE-19,
Room no. 806, 8th Floor,
Block E-2,
Dr. S.P.Mukherjee Civic
Center, JLN Marg,
Minto Road, New
Delhi-110002
Sub:- with
reference to F.No.Joint CIT/Range-19/2015-16/297
Respected Sir,
In reference to
above mentioned no. I would like to re-iterate the RTI rules as per which the
appellant’s presence is not mandatory in hearing of first appeal. If it is
mandatory then your esteemed authority is kindly requested to refer me the RTI
rules in respect thereof.
In above stated ref no., I have been asked to present all the documents on which I rely in support of my claim. In this regard, I will like to mention that, all the documents that I attached alongwith my original RTI Application to which this appeal concerns shall be taken into consideration. Along with those documents I am also sending two more annexure which shall also be taken into consideration while disposing this appeal in the interest of justice.
Further, I have full
faith that your esteemed authority will ensure accountability &
transparency whilst disposing off this appeal mentioned in above ref no.
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o
Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
Enclosed:-
Annexure 1 :- Manoj Kr. Saini
CIC – Decision in Appeal No. CIC/LS/A.2010/001044DS in Sh. Manoj Kr. Saini
Jaipur Vs. O/o Addl CIT 24.3.11, where
it was held that, we feel
that the information pertaining to net taxable income of an assessee for the
period of year 2000 till date be furnished by following the Section 10 of the
RTI Act to his Income Tax Returns.”
Annexure
2
:- Juhi Jadli vide CIC Judgment File
No:CIC/RM/A/2012/000038/LS dated 03/06/2013
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o
Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
Tax Evasion Petition, Flow of Funds for Dowry r/w Dowry
Prohibition Act & Income Tax Provisions vis-à-vis Survey Report
To Dated
Office of Income Tax
Officer,
WARD-19(1),
Room no. 807, 8th Floor,
Block E-2,
Dr. S.P.Mukherjee Civic
Center, JLN Marg,
Minto Road, New
Delhi-110002
Sub:- Request for information u/s 6 & 7
of RTI Act 2005
Respected Sir/ Madam,
It is
wrt reference number F.No.ITO/Ward-19(1)/RTI/2014-15/227
dt 20/06/2014 & F.No.ITO/Ward-39(2)/RTI/2016-17/467
dt 17/05/2016. I request the following information:-
(1)
Kindly supply the
information whether the amount reflected in the concerned ITR’s of that year
(i.e., year of marriage 2nd Dec’2013) reflects the marriage expenses
as claimed by Mrs. Pativrata Devi within the original application wrt the above
reference numbers which is said to be Rs.21,00,000 apart from dowry articles.
(2)
Kindly provide
certified copy of marriage expenditure survey report as per section 133A(5) of
Income Tax Act.
(3)
Kindly supply the
information whether those mentioned in the tax evasion petition satisfied the
cash flow details as per the I.T. Act.
I am
sending a Blank Postal Order no. ____________________
of Rs. 10 dated 02/05/2016is
attached herewith. Kindly fill the PIO details as it is the duty
of PIO to provide reasonable assistance u/s 5 (3) of
the RTI act to applicant. The requested information shall be supplied
free of charge in case the same could not be supplied within 30 days u/s 7(6)
of RTI Act 2005. Kindly provide the information to each point separately.
Please do not club the information to the points even if the information is
repeated.
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o
Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
Objections filed by Wife to RTI of Husband in a Matrimonial
Dispute
To Dated
Office of Income Tax
Officer,
WARD-39(1),
Room no. 807, 8th Floor,
Block E-2,
Dr. S.P.Mukherjee Civic
Center, JLN Marg,
Minto Road, New
Delhi-110002
Sub:- Request for
Information u/s 6 & 7 of RTI Act’2005 wrt Ref No. F.No.ITO/Ward-39(2)/RTI/2016-17/510
….. Dated 07/04/2016
Respected Sir,
Your esteemed office replied to my
three RTI Applications thru a single reference number as above. I need the
following information viz.,
(1)
Kindly supply the certified copy of
all documents & also certified copy of all the submissions of Mrs. Pativrata
Devi & communications to & from the Income Tax Department w.r.t the
three RTI Applications being mentioned in above ref no.
(2)
Kindly supply the certified copy of
objections filed by Mrs. Pativrata Devi wrt above ref no.
(3)
Kindly supply the certified copies of
three RTI Applications which I sent you & which are being mentioned in
above ref no.
(4)
Kindly provide the separate &
point wise reply to each of the point in each of these three RTI Applications being
mentioned in above ref no. Kindly do not club the information to the points
even if the information is repeated.
(5)
I am not satisfied with the response
as I & my wife are not a third party as my marriage still subsists. I
already attached proof of marriage & other litigations proof between
married couple to my original RTI applications itself.
(6)
Since FIR has been made against my
whole family & I already attached that FIR & my entire family is a
party & State is the other party. When state is a party in that FIR then
how that information can be held or even restricted. This is against the basic
spirit of RTI Act’2005.
I request you to provide the information at the
earliest. If not I'll be compelled to approach the Chief Information
Commissioner &/ or Delhi High Court &/ or Consumer Redressal Forum &/
or http://www.pgportal.gov.in for any attempt to restrict the flow of
information guaranteed vide Constitution of India vide RTI Act’2005.
I am sending a Blank
Postal Order no. ____________________
of Rs. 10 dated 02/05/2016 is
attached herewith. Kindly fill the PIO details as it is the duty
of PIO to provide reasonable assistance u/s 5 (3) of
the RTI act to applicant. The requested information shall be supplied
free of charge in case the same could not be supplied within 30 days u/s 7(6)
of RTI Act 2005. Kindly provide the information to each point separately.
Please do not club the information to the points even if the information is
repeated.
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o
Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
Complaint against PIO/ FAA to CVC &/or pgportal.gov.in
&/or High Court Writ &/or Consumer Court
To Dated
Joint Commissioner
of Income Tax –cum- FAA
O/o Hon’ble First
Appellate Authority,
RANGE-39,
Room no. 806, 8th Floor,
Block E-2,
Dr. S.P.Mukherjee Civic
Center, JLN Marg,
Minto Road, New
Delhi-110002
Sub:- Request for Information u/s 6 & 7 of
RTI Act’2005
Respected Sir,
Your subordinate office replied to
my 3 RTI Applications thru a single reference number viz., Ref No. F.No.ITO/Ward-39(2)/RTI/2016-17/312 dt 07/08/2016.:-
(1)
Kindly provide the separate &
point wise reply to each of the points in each of these three RTI Applications
being mentioned in above ref no. Kindly do not club the information to the
points even if the information is repeated.
(2)
I am not satisfied with the response
as I & my wife are not a third party as my marriage still subsists. I
already attached proof of marriage & other litigations proof between
married couple under discussion to my original three RTI applications itself.
(3)
Since FIR has been made against my
whole family & I already attached that FIR & my entire family is a
party & State is the other party. When state is a party in that FIR then
how that information can be held or even restricted. This is against the basic
spirit of RTI Act’2005.
(4)
Kindly supply me certified copies of
all the above three RTI’s (including documents attached) which have been
referred to in the above reference number.
I again request that
all the points of my RTI request shall be answered. And my different RTI’s in
the above mentioned reference number shall be answered through separate paper
& without clubbing two or more RTI’s which is against the very spirit of
RTI Act’2005. Thereby I request your honor to provide the information at the
earliest within the provisions of the RTI Act’2005. If not I'll be compelled to
approach the Chief Information Commissioner &/ or Delhi High Court &/
or Consumer Redressal Forum &/ or http://www.pgportal.gov.in &/or
Central Vigilance Commission or other concerned authorities for any attempt to
restrict the flow of information guaranteed vide Constitution of India vide RTI
Act’2005.
I am sending a Blank
Postal Order no. ___________
of Rs. 10 dated 02/05/2016 is
attached herewith. Kindly fill the PIO details as it is the duty
of PIO to provide reasonable assistance u/s 5 (3) of
the RTI act to applicant. The requested information shall be supplied
free of charge in case the same could not be supplied within 30 days u/s 7(6)
of RTI Act 2005. Kindly provide the information to each point separately.
Please do not club the information to the points even if the information is
repeated.
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o
Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
Tax Evasion Petition [TEP] against Wife, Mother-in-Law,
Father-inLaw, Brother-in-Law, Sister-in-Law
To Dated
ITO, Ward-31(1),
Room B-125
First Floor, Civic
Centre, JLN Marg,
New Delhi - 110002
Sub:- with
reference to F.No.ITO-WARD-31(1)2016-17/12 dated 02/06/2016 received by me on
Saturday Evening 13/09.2014 vide Speed Post Ref No. ED312343149IN
Respected Sir,
In reference to
above mentioned no., I would like to state that, I made TEP regarding four
persons as you can check my original TEP application associated with the above
reference number. And out of these four persons who are family members living
at same address, I only know the PAN number of my wife Smt. Pativrata Devi
which is ARERT1234G. Since,
she herself has claimed that huge expenses were made by her family members
i.e., other persons including her named in the original TEP (including
Annexures).
I would like to take
this opportunity to thank the Hon’ble Income Tax Authorities in their endeavour
to curb tax evasion within the country which is causing huge loss to exchequer,
hence, It would be my great honor that your esteemed office directs the
concerned officers for a thorough investigation based on the claims &
averments made by Mrs. Pativrata Devi r/w the original TEP & Annexures
within & in respect thereof.
I appeal your honor
to complete the investigation at the earliest & within the time limit
prescribed in respect thereof & also to have a check that there is no
corruption or connivance involved as this family might use their influence
& links due to the top positions which they hold. If not I'll be compelled
to approach the Judiciary &/ or http://www.pgportal.gov.in
or other concerned authorities for any lapses or delays.
Further, I have full
faith that your esteemed authority will ensure accountability &
transparency whilst disposing off this TEP mentioned in above ref no.
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o
Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
Fees payable to get RTI information without visiting the
office of PIO/ FAA personally [Paper Tigers]
To Dated
CPIO & ITO,
Ward-39(2),
Delhi - 110002
Sub:- Re:
F.No.ITO/Ward-39(2)/RTI/2016-17/141 dated:29/04/2016
Respected Sir/Madam,
This is with regards to:-
F.No.ITO/Ward-39(2)/RTI/2016-17/141
dated:29/04/2016
I am enclosing the postal orders
bearing numbers 39H 129256, 39H 129477, 39H 129085, 39H
129086, 39H 129087, 79G 122036, worth Rs.100, Rs.100, Rs.100,
Rs.100, Rs.100, and Rs.50 respectively and all dated 08/04/2016 in this regard.
If there is any other fees payable
under the provisions of the RTI Act then I am ready to pay that also. Kindly
inform me in accordance.
Please send me the requisite documents with regards to F.No.ITO/Ward-39(2)/RTI/2016-17/141
dated:29/04/2016 at below mentioned address as early as possible.
Thanking you in Anticipation.
Yours
Faithfully
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
FAA did NOT used Reply / Written Arguments of RTI Applicant
while disposing off the FA
To Dated
CPIO & ITO,
Ward-39(2),
Delhi - 110002
Sub:- Request
for Information u/s 6 & 7 of RTI Act’2005 with respect to
Ref No.
F.No.Joint CIT/Range-19/2016-17/212 ….. Dated 18/04/2016
Respected Sir/Madam,
This is with regards
to:-
F.No.Joint CIT/Range-19/2016-17/212 …..
Dated 18/04/2016
Your esteemed
authority has considered my reply in the above reference number.
(1) Kindly supply me
the certified copy of my reply which was considered while disposing off the
said appeal.
(2) Kindly supply me
the complete reference number through which this appeal’s decision was informed
to me.
(3) Kindly supply me
the certified copy of the appeal’s decision pertaining to the above reference
number.
I am sending a Blank
Postal Order no. 07G 323427
of Rs.20 dated 08/04/2016 is
attached herewith. Kindly fill the PIO details as it is the duty
of PIO to provide reasonable assistance u/s 5 (3) of
the RTI act to applicant. The requested information shall be supplied
free of charge in case the same could not be supplied within 30 days u/s 7(6) of
RTI Act 2005. Kindly provide the information to each point separately. Please
do not club the information to the points even if the information is repeated.
I request that Rs.10
from the above postal order no. 07G 323427
of Rs.20 dated 08/04/2016 shall
be used as a fees for RTI & remaining Rs.10 can be used to send me the
response to this RTI as I am sure there will be maximum five copies as a
response to this RTI. In case, this request can’t be entertained then, I am
also sending one blank postal order no. 07G
323454 of Rs.20 alongwith which can be used if need be.
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o
Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
RTI on Family Court, Dwaraka
To Dated
Public Information
Officer
Administrative
Branch, Family Courts
DWARKA COURTS
COMPLEX, Sector-10
DWARKA, New Delhi -
110075
Sub:- Request
for information u/s 6 & 7 of RTI Act
2005.
It is requested that
the certified copies related to the Case
No. 111/2016 with JFC Ms. Sharmila
Kumari (Room No. 11), Ground Floor, Rohini DistrictCourts shall be
provided under provisions of RTI Act’2005:-
1.
Kindly supply the Certified Copy of Entire File for Record of above
mentioned case number. In this regard, it is also requested to your esteemed
authority to honor the provisions of section-6(3) of RTI Act’2005 to pass this
application to concerned PIO if the information is NOT available with this PIO.
It is mentioned in
this regard that the above case number is between my wife & me i.e.,
between (Pativrata Devi & Atur Chatur) so I am the respondent for the above
case & hence as per the provisions of the RTI Act’2005 I have this right to
receive this information which is also guaranteed to me vide constitution of
India.
For the sake of
convenience it is to be informed that the last date of hearing of this case
with above JFC was 30.04.2016 and that the next date of hearing fixed for this
case is with same JFC is fixed for 09.08.2016.
If any other
document like address proof or other details required from me to be submitted
then I shall kindly be informed & I will provide those within the
provisions of the RTI Act’2005.
I am sending a Blank
Postal Order no. 07G 323439
of Rs. 20 dated 08/04/2016 is
attached herewith. Kindly fill the PIO details as it is the duty
of PIO to provide reasonable assistance u/s 5 (3) of
the RTI act to applicant. The requested information shall be supplied
free of charge in case the same could not be supplied within 30 days u/s 7(6)
of RTI Act 2005. Kindly provide the information to each point separately.
Please do not club the information to the points even if the information is
repeated.
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o
Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
Certified Copy of Letter issued to Wife against whom TEP or
RTI+TEP has been filed by the husband
To Dated :
05/08/2016
Office of Income Tax
Officer,
WARD-29(3),
Room no. 807, 8th Floor,
Block E-2,
Dr. S.P.Mukherjee Civic
Center, JLN Marg,
Minto Road, New
Delhi-110002
Sub:- Request for
Information u/s 6 & 7 of RTI Act’2005 with respect to F.No.ITO/Ward-29(3)/RTI/2016-17/671 Dt
03/08/2016 / 04/08/2016
Respected Sir,
Please
provide the following information wrt above reference number :-
(1)
Under Point No.1 sub-point (m) you
have informed me that your esteemed department is in the process of evaluating
the information given by me & action will be taken accordingly. INFORMATION REQUESTED = Kindly
supply me the ATR (i.e., Action Taken Report) in respect thereof.
(2)
Under Point No.1 sub-point (t) it is
mentioned that with regard to point (t) to (x) a letter dt.28/07/2014 was
issued to Ms. Pativrata Devi. Kindly supply me the certified copy of this
letter which was issued by your department. I would like to inform you that, this
letter that was issued by your esteemed authority comes very well within my
right to receive information & if this information is not provided to me
then this would mean deliberately restricting the flow of information as per
best of my knowledge.
I request that this
information sought wrt accountability & transparency be provided at the
earliest within the provisions of the RTI Rules’2005. If not, I’ll be compelled
to approach the CIC, &/or Consumer Redressal Forum &/or
http://www.pgportal.gov.in OR may be Delhi High Court directly for any further
restriction to the flow of information which is also guaranteed vide
constitution of India.
I am sending a Blank
Postal Order no. 32F 112312 of Rs. 10 dated 04/08/2016 is attached herewith.
Kindly fill the PIO details as it is the duty
of PIO to provide reasonable assistance u/s 5 (3) of
the RTI act to applicant. The requested information shall be
supplied free of charge in case the same could not be supplied within 30 days
u/s 7(6) of RTI Act 2005. Please do not club the information to the points even
if the information is repeated.
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o
Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
Wife shows herself as unmarried & dependent after her
father’s demise to get benefits which are usually given to unmarried female
dependents under Central Government Rules
To Dated:-
03/05/2016
Public Information
Officer (RTI)
New Administrative Block,
University of Delhi,
New Delhi-110007
Sub:- Request for information u/s 6 & 7
of RTI Act 2005
Respected Sir/ Madam,
It is
requested that following information may kindly be supplied under RTI Act 2005
w.r.t Ex-Professor of Law Faculty (Late)
Sh. Rajyavardhan Singh Rathore as per your records :-
1.
Kindly supply the amount & date
of last drawn pension by the above Professor.
2.
Kindly supply the Certified Copy of
last drawn pension details.
3.
Kindly supply the amount & date
of last drawn pension by the dependent of the above professor.
4.
Kindly supply the name & address
of the person who receives the pension as a dependent of the above professor.
5.
Kindly provide the family members
details & their marital status as per your records as on January’2013
6.
Kindly provide the family members
details & their marital status as per your records as on January’2014
7.
Kindly provide the family members
details & their marital status as per your records as on October’2014
8.
Kindly supply the certified copies of
the documents submitted by the dependent of the above professor to get pension
on behalf of the above professor.
9.
Kindly supply the address of the
above named professor as per your records.
I am sending a Blank
Postal Order no. 32F 123765
of Rs. 10 dated 14/04/2016 is
attached herewith. Kindly fill the PIO details as
it is the duty of PIO to provide reasonable assistance u/s 5 (3) of
the RTI act to applicant. The requested information shall be
supplied free of charge in case the same could not be supplied within 30 days
u/s 7(6) of RTI Act 2005. Please do not club the information to the points even
if the information is repeated.
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o
Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
Wife gets admission in Professional Courses but asks for
Maintenance from Husband pretending to be an abla naari
To Dated:-
05/06/2016
Public Information
Officer
Institute of Cost & Works
Accountants of India,
ICWAI Bhawan, Lodhi Road
New Delhi-110003
Sub:- Request for information u/s 6 & 7
of RTI Act 2005
Respected Sir/ Madam,
It is
requested that following information may kindly be supplied under RTI Act 2005
w.r.t any/all the candidates named “PATIVRATA DEVI” as per your records :-
1.
Kindly supply the list of all
candidates as per your records who have the name of “PATIVRATA DEVI” and
admitted in any course in ICWAI in the month:-
(a)
June’2015
(b)
July’2015
(c)
August’2015
(d)
September’2015
(e)
October’2015
(f)
November’2015
(g)
December’2015
(h)
January’2016
(i)
February’2016
(j)
March’2016
(k)
April’2016
(l)
May’2016
(m) June’2016
(n)
July’2016
(o)
August’2016
(p)
September’2016
(q)
October’2016
(r)
November’2016
I am sending a Blank
Postal Order no. 16F 102912
of Rs. 10 dated 05/04/2016 is
attached herewith. Kindly fill the PIO details as
it is the duty of PIO to provide reasonable assistance u/s 5 (3) of
the RTI act to applicant. The requested information shall be
supplied free of charge in case the same could not be supplied within 30 days
u/s 7(6) of RTI Act 2005. Please do not club the information to the points even
if the information is repeated.
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o
Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
Property in name of Wife – Property Sub-Registrars Search in
Delhi & Punjab
To Date:
10/04/2016
Public Information
Officer,
Deputy Commissioner,
City Zone,
M.L.U.G Car Parking
Bldg,
Asaf Ali Road, New
Delhi - 110001
Sub:- Request for information u/s 6 & 7
of RTI Act 2005
Respected Sir/ Madam,
Please provide the
following information under accountability & transparency guaranteed vide
Constitution of India through the Right to Information Act’2005.
(1)
Kindly provide the
date when this RTI reached your esteemed office.
(2)
Kindly provide the
name of the officer providing answers to this RTI.
(3)
Kindly provide the
name & address of all the registrars of different zones of Delhi who
maintain the records related to properties in Delhi.
(4)
Kindly provide the
name & address of all the registrars of different zones of Ajmer & who
maintain the records related to properties in different zones of Ajmer.
(5)
Kindly provide the
name & address of all the registrars of different zones (all cities) of Punjab
who maintain the records related to properties in Punjab.
(6)
Kindly provide the
procedure to get the property / properties registered on the basis of only name
in Delhi i.e., if I give you just one name then will you provide me list of all
the properties registered by different people having that name.
(7)
Kindly provide the
procedure to get the property / properties registered on the basis of only
purchaser’s address in Delhi i.e., if I give you just one address then will you
provide me list of all the properties purchased by any resident of that
address.
(8)
Kindly provide the
list of other government registrars who maintain the records related to
properties in Delhi.
I am sending a Blank
Postal Order no. 32F 193236
of Rs. 10 dated 21/03/2016 is
attached herewith. Kindly fill the PIO details as it is the duty
of PIO to provide reasonable assistance u/s 5 (3) of
the RTI act to applicant. The requested information shall be supplied
free of charge in case the same could not be supplied within 30 days u/s 7(6)
of RTI Act 2005. Kindly provide the information to each point separately.
Please do not club the information to the points even if the information is
repeated.
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o
Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
RTI on Regional Transport Office – RTI on RTO
APPLICATION UNDER THE RIGHT TO
INFORMATION ACT, 2005
To
Public Information Officer
REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE,
Wazir Pur, North West Delhi
New Delhi - 110052
Dear Sir,
Subject :
Seeking Information under Section 6(1) & 7(1) of the RTI Act, 2005.
Sl. No.
|
Particulars
|
Details
|
1
|
Name of the Public Authority
|
PIO
REGIONAL
TRANSPORT OFFICE,
Wazir
Pur, North West Delhi
New
Delhi - 110052
|
2
|
Full Name of
the Applicant
|
ATUR CHATUR
|
3
|
Full Address
|
c/o Q-7/77, GF,
Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
|
4
|
Particulars of Information/Documents/
Inspection
sought
|
Please provide
the Certified Copies of the Documents pertaining to the Ownership and Vehicle
details of the Vehicle Registration number:
DL-9F
R-1234
|
5
|
Period for which information is required
|
01-01-2011 and
Till date
|
6
|
Other details,
if any
|
Required below Documents:
|
7
|
Initial Fee
payment Details
|
I am sending a Blank Postal Order no. 32F 193104 of Rs. 10 dated 19/03/2016 is attached
herewith. Kindly fill the PIO details as it is the duty of PIO to
provide reasonable assistance u/s 5 (3) of the RTI act to
applicant. The requested information shall be supplied free of charge in case
the same could not be supplied within 30 days u/s 7(6) of RTI Act 2005.
Kindly provide the information to each point separately. Please do not club
the information to the points even if the information is repeated.
|
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o
Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
RTI to check legality of property of FIL/ MIL/ BIL/ SIL/ Wife
& documents thereof
APPLICATION UNDER THE RIGHT TO
INFORMATION ACT, 2005
To
Public Information Officer
O/o Chief Secretary of GNCTD,
Delhi Secretariat, I.P. Estate
New Delhi - 110002
Dear Sir,
Subject :
Seeking Information under Section 6(1) & 7(1) of the RTI Act, 2005.
Sl. No.
|
Particulars
|
Details
|
1
|
Name of the Public Authority
|
Public Information Officer
ASSISTANT
REVENUE OFFICER,
ZONE
(Shalimar Bagh),
North
West Delhi, New Delhi
|
2
|
Full Name of
the Applicant
|
ATUR CHATUR
|
3
|
Full Address
|
c/o Q-7/77, GF,
Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
|
4
|
Particulars of Information/Documents/
Inspection
sought
|
Please provide the Certified Copies of the documents
confirming the legality of the below said Property Registered in the name of Sh. Rajyavardhan Singh Rathore
Sh. (Late) Rajyavardhan Singh Rathore
AZ-624, Rani Bagh, New Delhi-110034
|
5
|
Period for which Information is required
|
01-01-1990 and
Till date
|
6
|
Details of Documents
required
|
Required below Documents:
1.
Khata
2.
Latest Tax Paid Receipt
3.
EC of past 10years
4.
Copy of Proofs submitted
while obtaining Katha
|
7
|
Initial Fee
payment Details
|
I am sending a Blank Postal Order no. 16F 191827 of Rs. 10 dated 02/05/2016 is attached
herewith. Kindly fill the PIO details as it is the duty of PIO to
provide reasonable assistance u/s 5 (3) of the RTI act to
applicant. The requested information shall be supplied free of charge in case
the same could not be supplied within 30 days u/s 7(6) of RTI Act 2005.
Kindly provide the information to each point separately. Please do not club
the information to the points even if the information is repeated.
|
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o
Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
Honeymoon Travel details through RTI when wife says she did
NOT travelled by plane for honeymoon
To Dated:-
02/08/2016
PIO, AAI
Rajiv Gandhi Bhawan, Safdarjung
Airport,
New Delhi-110003
Sub:- Request for information u/s 6 & 7
of RTI Act 2005
Respected Sir/ Madam,
My
name is ATUR CHATUR, Address:- Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085. Email:
aturchatur@yahoo.com Phone: 09873540498. I booked ticket with reservation
number QBA2GH on 29 November
2013 from (Air India Ltd)
with below mentioned details:-
Name of Passengers:- MR.ATUR
CHATUR MS.PATIVRATA
DEVI
Flight Number:- AI812 Delhi [Terminal 1B] to
Jammu, date: 03 December’ 2013
Flight Number:- AI813 Jammu to Delhi, date: 15
December’ 2013
(1)
Please provide
certified copy of the above stated reservation number.
(2)
Please also provide
certified copy of any other documents associated with the above reservation
number as per your records.
(3)
Please provide
information whether the passengers mentioned in the above reference number
actually travelled or not in Flight Number AI812 on 03 December 2013.
(4)
Please provide
certified copy of all documents associated with this travel mentioned in point
number (3) above.
(5)
Please provide
whether the passengers mentioned in the above reference number actually
travelled or not in Flight Number AI813 on 15 December 2013. Please provide
certified copy of all documents associated with this travel.
(6)
Please provide
certified copy of all documents associated with this travel mentioned in point
number (5) above.
I am sending a Blank
Postal Order no. 32F 137364
of Rs. 10 dated 11/07/2016 is
attached herewith. Kindly fill the PIO details as it is the duty
of PIO to provide reasonable assistance u/s 5 (3) of
the RTI act to applicant. The requested information shall be supplied
free of charge in case the same could not be supplied within 30 days u/s 7(6)
of RTI Act 2005. Kindly provide the information to each point separately.
Please do not club the information to the points even if the information is
repeated.
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o
Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
First Appeal on Family Court when access to information is
denied @ subsidized rates under RTI Act 2005
To Dated 09/09/2016
First Appellate
Authority,
Principal Judge,
Family Court,
North-East, Vishwas
Nagar,
New Delhi-110032
Sub:- with
reference to ID No. 35/2016
With
reference to No.715/RTI/FC/DWK/2016
Dated: 14 AUG 2016
Respected Sir,
In reference to
above REFERENCE NUMBER I would like to humbly state that there are around 700
+/-50 pages in the entire file which I requested and cost of these documents
thru RTI is around two to three times more economical & for a middle class
man like me who has to support his family besides being suffering from
Avascular Necrosis being unable to walk smoothly & also facing false dowry
cases on me hence denying me this information through RTI would also mean
denying me my fundamental rights guaranteed vide Constitution of India.
I most humbly
request that the requisite information may kindly be provided to me through RTI
as per the cost of true copies mentioned under the RTI Rules’2005 &
provisions contained therein.
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o
Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
Link Appellate Authority Karkadooma Courts who is LAA to FAA
Family Court Dwarka
To Dated 09/09/2016
Link Appellate
Authority,
Ld. Principal Judge,
Shahdara,
Karkardooma, Delhi
Sub:- with
reference to ID No. 35/2016
With
reference to No.715/RTI/FC/DWK/2016
Dated: 14 AUG 2016
Respected Sir,
In reference to
above REFERENCE NUMBER I would like to humbly state that there are around 700
+/-50 pages in the entire file which I requested and cost of these documents
thru RTI is around two to three times more economical & for a middle class
man like me who has to support his family besides being suffering from
Avascular Necrosis being unable to walk smoothly & also facing false dowry
cases on me hence denying me this information through RTI would also mean
denying me my fundamental rights guaranteed vide Constitution of India.
I most humbly
request that the requisite information may kindly be provided to me through RTI
as per the cost of true copies mentioned under the RTI Rules’2005 &
provisions contained therein.
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o
Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
First Appeal on ICWAI for status of Wife’s admission in a
Professional Course and demand of Maintenance by presenting herself as abla
naari
To Dated 03/12/2016
First Appellate
Authority,
ICWAI, ICWAI Bhawan,
Lodhi Road,
New Delhi-110003
Sub:- First
Appeal u/s 19(1) of RTI Act 2005
With reference to ICWAI:RTIA:CPIO:3123:2016 Dated: 02 NOV
2016
Respected Sir,
I asked for list of
candidates having name “PATIVRATA DEVI” admitted anytime between June’2015 to
Nov’2016 in any course. Now, in the reply PIO says that there are three courses
in ICWAI viz., Foundation, Inter & Final.
And further the PIO
says that:-
It is NOT POSSIBLE
to provide information.
Whereas, Even an
illiterate knows that these days computers are so fast that you put a name in
the database & it lists down all the persons having same name as typed. The
PIO does NOT want to put even simple efforts to provide this information.
The PIO wants me to
believe that, it is NOT POSSIBLE to gather this information.
Or the PIO wants to
make me believe indirectly that the records are NOT Computerized in India’s premium
Cost Accounting Standards institution i.e., ICWAI. I have been shocked to see
this response from PIO, ICWAI.
PRAYER:-
(1)
The PIO be directed to immediately
release this information which he has denied.
(2)
The further information shall be
provided free of cost i.e., the applicant/ undersigned be exempted in view of
section 7(6) of RTI Act 2005 from payment of any further fee payable by me for
supplying of requested information on account of default on the part of PIO to
supply information within prescribed time.
(3)
Action & Penalty against erring
PIO as per section 20 of RTI Rules’2005
I request your
esteemed authority that this information sought wrt accountability &
transparency be provided at the earliest within the provisions of the RTI
Rules’2005. If not, I’ll be compelled to approach the Central Information
Commission &/or http://www.pgportal.gov.in &/or Delhi High Court
directly for any further restriction to this flow of information under RTI
Act’2005 which is also guaranteed vide constitution of India.
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o
Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
Wife’s Admission STATUS in ICWAI
To Dated:-
16/08/2016
Public Information
Officer
Institute of Cost & Works
Accountants of India,
ICWAI Bhawan, Lodhi Road
New Delhi-110003
Sub:- Request for information u/s 6 & 7
of RTI Act 2005
Respected Sir/ Madam,
It is
requested that following information may kindly be supplied under RTI Act 2005
w.r.t any/all the candidates named “PATIVRATA DEVI” as per your records :-
1.
Kindly supply the list of all
candidates as per your records who have the name of “PATIVRATA DEVI” and
admitted in FOUNDATION in Delhi Chapter of ICWAI in the year 2015.
2.
Kindly supply the list of all
candidates as per your records who have the name of “PATIVRATA DEVI” and
admitted in FOUNDATION in Delhi Chapter of ICWAI in the year 2016.
3.
Kindly supply the list of all
candidates as per your records who have the name of “PATIVRATA DEVI” and admitted
in INTER in Delhi Chapter of ICWAI in the year 2015.
4.
Kindly supply the list of all
candidates as per your records who have the name of “PATIVRATA DEVI” and
admitted in INTER in Delhi Chapter of ICWAI in the year 2016.
5.
Kindly supply the list of all
candidates as per your records who have the name of “PATIVRATA DEVI” and
admitted in FINAL in Delhi Chapter of ICWAI in the year 2015.
6.
Kindly supply the list of all
candidates as per your records who have the name of “PATIVRATA DEVI” and
admitted in FINAL in Delhi Chapter of ICWAI in the year 2016.
7.
Kindly supply the list of all
candidates as per your records who have the name of “PATIVRATA DEVI” and
admitted in FOUNDATION in whole of ICWAI in the year 2015.
8.
Kindly supply the list of all
candidates as per your records who have the name of “PATIVRATA DEVI” and
admitted in FOUNDATION in whole of ICWAI in the year 2016.
9.
Kindly supply the list of all
candidates as per your records who have the name of “PATIVRATA DEVI” and
admitted in INTER in whole of ICWAI in the year 2015.
10.
Kindly supply the list of all
candidates as per your records who have the name of “PATIVRATA DEVI” and
admitted in INTER in whole of ICWAI in the year 2016.
11.
Kindly supply the list of all
candidates as per your records who have the name of “PATIVRATA DEVI” and
admitted in FINAL in whole of ICWAI in the year 2015.
12.
Kindly supply the list of all
candidates as per your records who have the name of “PATIVRATA DEVI” and
admitted in FINAL in whole of ICWAI in the year 2016.
I am sending a Blank
Postal Order no. 32F 192347
of Rs. 10 dated 15/08/2016 is
attached herewith. Kindly fill the PIO details as
it is the duty of PIO to provide reasonable assistance u/s 5 (3) of
the RTI act to applicant. The requested information shall be
supplied free of charge in case the same could not be supplied within 30 days
u/s 7(6) of RTI Act 2005. Please do not club the information to the points even
if the information is repeated.
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o
Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
FAA Family Court does NOT sends the FA Decision to RTI
Applicant
To Dated 31/12/2016
First Appellate
Authority,
Principal Judge,
Family Court,
North-East, Vishwas
Nagar,
New Delhi-110032
Sub:- with
reference to ID No. 34/2016
With
reference to No.6257/RTI/FC/DWK/2016
Dated: 23 NOV 2016
Respected Sir,
I sent the attached
First Appeal on 31/10/2016. I request that I may be sent the decision of the
first appellant authority at my below address.
(Annexed First Appeal for your kind perusal.)
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o
Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
Bank Lockers of FIL/ MIL/ BIL/ SIL/ Wife vis-à-vis Money
Laundering &/or Embezzlement of Funds & duping the Income Tax
Authorities & the nation
To Dated:-
19/09/2016
Public Information
Officer
IDBI BANK
IDBI BHAWAN
X - 5, "U" Block, Colaba Complex,
Bandra (East),Mumbai 400 061
Sub:- Request for information u/s 6 & 7
of RTI Act 2005
Respected Sir/ Madam,
As per
page 18 of Times of India (Delhi) dated 9th March’2015 there is an
article with the heading “Banks flout rules in locker allotments” & there
is written that, “RBI says banks must maintain a list and be transparent
in allotting lockers” It is requested that following information may
kindly be supplied under RTI Act 2005 with respect to any/ all of your
branch/es in Rohini Delhi:-
13.
Kindly provide the information
whether your branch maintains a list in allotting lockers.
14.
Kindly provide the name, designation
of the officer responsible for maintaining this list in your branch.
15.
Kindly provide the
information whether your branch maintains transparency in allotting lockers.
16.
Kindly provide the name, designation
of the officer responsible for maintaining this transparency in your branch.
17.
Kindly provide the total number of
lockers in your branch.
18.
Kindly provide the total number of
lockers allotted to people.
19.
Kindly provide the total number of
lockers not yet allotted to anyone.
20.
Kindly provide the list of those
people who have been allotted lockers by your Branch.
I am sending a Blank
Postal Order no. 16F 827364
of Rs. 10 dated 18/05/2016 is
attached herewith. Kindly fill the PIO details as
it is the duty of PIO to provide reasonable assistance u/s 5 (3) of
the RTI act to applicant. The requested information shall be
supplied free of charge in case the same could not be supplied within 30 days
u/s 7(6) of RTI Act 2005. Please do not club the information to the points even
if the information is repeated.
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o
Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
Wife shuns her domestic relationship with the husband and
files complaint under domestic vilence against husband – Wife herself leaves
the husband & this means she does NOT have any intention to join back the
domesticity with the husband & relatives hence fasity of complaint under DV
Act
To Dated:-
29/05/2016
Public Information
Officer
Office of Chief Electoral
Officer of Delhi,
Old Stephan’s College Building, Kashmere Gate,
New Delhi-110006
Sub:- Request for information u/s 6 & 7
of RTI Act 2005
Respected
Sir/ Madam,
I
checked Electoral Roll, 2014 of Assembly Constituency, 14 - ROHINI, (GEN)
NCT of Delhi with the Qualifying Date 01-01-2016. On page 37
there is a List of Additions. (Annexed for the kind perusal of this
Hon’ble Public Information Officer). It is requested that following information
may kindly be supplied under RTI Act 2005 as per your records :-
1.
Kindly supply certified copy of
punishment provisions for providing bogus name in the electoral roll.
2.
Kindly supply certified copy related
to duration a person must live at an address before being entitled to vote.
3.
Kindly supply the date or time period
since these people are living at the address mentioned therein.
4.
Kindly supply the certified copy of
all the documents submitted by all these people within this list of additions
to the voter list.
5.
Kindly supply the information as to all
the dates when these people voted in this Assembly Constituency.
6.
Kindly provide certified copy related
to all the dates when these people voted after getting their names added in
this Assembly Constituency.
I am sending a Blank
Postal Order no. 32F 373646
of Rs. 10 dated 01/09/2016 is
attached herewith. Kindly fill the PIO details as
it is the duty of PIO to provide reasonable assistance u/s 5 (3) of
the RTI act to applicant. The requested information shall be
supplied free of charge in case the same could not be supplied within 30 days
u/s 7(6) of RTI Act 2005. Please do not club the information to the points even
if the information is repeated.
Enclosed:-
Page 37 (List of Additions) as discussed above
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o
Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
To Ensure current status vis-a-vis validity &
applicability & legality of a CIC Decision
To Dated:-
31/07/2016
Public Information
Officer
Central Information Commission
August Kranti Bhavan, Bhikaji Cama Place,
New Delhi - 110 066
Sub:- Request for information u/s 6 & 7
of RTI Act 2005
Respected Sir/ Madam,
It is
requested that following information may kindly be supplied under RTI Act
2005:-
1. Kindly
provide the certified copy of second appeal including index & enclosures
pertaining to CIC Decision No. CIC/VS/A/2013/000384/05739.
2. Kindly
supply information in ‘yes’ or ‘no’ on whether the CIC Decision No. CIC/VS/A/2013/000384/05739
has been over-ruled or not till date.
I am sending a Blank
Postal Order no. 32F 123456
of Rs. 10 dated 01/12/2016 is
attached herewith. Kindly fill the PIO details as
it is the duty of PIO to provide reasonable assistance u/s 5 (3) of
the RTI act to applicant. The requested information shall be
supplied free of charge in case the same could not be supplied within 30 days
u/s 7(6) of RTI Act 2005. Please do not club the information to the points even
if the information is repeated.
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o
Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
Banks can NOT withhold information merely citing Personal
Information Exemption Clause (Arguments helpful for RTI Acticists)
Larger Public
Interest:-
The argument seems to be in consonance with the former stance of the Delhi High
Court in the case of Secretary General, Supreme Court v Subhash Chandra
Agarwal, (Writ Petition Number 288/200) while dealing with the scope and ambit
of exemption clauses under the right to information act. The court in this case discussed that the
exemption of withholding information because of fiduciary relationship may not
apply in cases involving a larger public interest the same way as a man cannot
be made confidant of a crime or a fraud. “This is a limiting principle where
balance has to be maintained between weighing the public interest in
maintaining confidence against a countervailing public interest favoring
disclosure. Embraced within this limiting principle is, of course, the so
called defense of iniquity wherein in certain circumstances the public interest
in maintaining confidence may be outweighed by the public interest in
disclosure. The court also discussed the factum of right of privacy being in
constant conflict with right to information. The right to privacy can be waived
off if the applicant can show sufficient public interest.” The above
observations of the court constantly seem to reiterate the principle on which
the right of information act rests. It reiterates the principle of disclosure
being the norm and refusal being an exception.
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o
Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
Bank Account details of Wife & In-Laws where wife has
Joint Account but NOT disclosed in her Income & Assets Affidavit
To Dated:- 01/06/2016
Public Information
Officer,
State Bank of India,
Vijay
Nagar, Head Office, Delhi - 110009
Sub:- Request for information u/s 6 & 7 of the
RTI Act’2005
(1) I want to know
whether the State Bank of India has any account who has given this
particular address viz., AZ 741 Rani Bagh Delhi 110034.
In this regard it is most humbly
& respectfully submitted that I simply want a response from the bank in
'yes' or 'no' and nothing more than a 'yes' or 'no'.
It is further submitted that, I
required this information on account of the suspicion that certain malpractices
are being routed through this bank account which could be money laundering.
It is prayed before the Hon'ble PIO
that I am an informed citizen, wanting to get information in the public
interest. And I further respectfully emphasize that I does not want any
statement of account and that I does not even want to know whether it is a cash
credit or savings bank or term loan or a current account.
It is further prayed that, I just
want to get a response from the bank in 'yes' or 'no' on the point mentioned in
this RTI i.e., whether there is any account-holder in the bank with the address
AZ 741 Rani Bagh Delhi 110034
CONFIDENTIAL CLAUSE
The details of this
application/appeal may kindly be treated in strictest confidence and should not
be revealed to any other person/s, except to the third party u/s 11 of RTI Act
2005, if need be. If any person seeks copy of this application a notice should
be served to me u/s 11 and I should be heard before parting with details. PIO
and FAA are duty bound not to permit unauthorized access to govt. records. It
is respectfully submitted that I shall hold PIO/deemed PIO/FAA responsible for any
unauthorized leakage of details of this application.
CITATION
As per Decision No. CIC/VS/A/2013/000384/05739 it was held by CIC that, “7.The
appellant said that he just wants to get a response from the bank in 'yes' or
'no' on the point mentioned in the RTI application, i.e., whether there is any
accountholder in the bank with the addresses mentioned in the RTI application.
Decision:
8. The respondent is directed to
provide to the appellant, within 30 days of this order, the information sought
as per para 7 above in context of the RTI application." (Annexed for the kind perusal
of this Hon’ble PIO)
I am sending a Blank
Postal Order no. 16F 123456
of Rs. 10 dated 15/04/2016 is
attached herewith. Kindly fill the PIO details as it is the duty
of PIO to provide reasonable assistance u/s 5 (3) of
the RTI act to applicant. The requested information shall be supplied
free of charge in case the same could not be supplied within 30 days u/s 7(6)
of RTI Act 2005.
Enclosed:- (1) Decision No. CIC/VS/A/2013/000384/05739
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o Q-7/77, GF,
Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email:
aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
All India/ Pan India Bank Account check of the wife &
in-laws through RTI including Joint Account of Wife
To Dated:-
25/12/2016
Public Information
Officer
State Bank of India,
Vijay Nagar, Head Office, Delhi - 110009
Sub:- Request for information u/s 6 & 7
of RTI Act 2005
wrt reference
number:- सूअवि/45/1234 Dated 09/12/2016
Respected Sir/ Madam,
It is requested that following information may kindly be
supplied under RTI Act 2005 wrt
reference number:- सूअवि/45/1234 Dated 09/12/2016:-
7.
That the Hon’ble PIO wrt reference number:- सूअवि/45/1234 Dated 09/12/2016 has informed that, there is NO
account with State Bank of India who has given this particular address viz., AZ
741 Rani Bagh Delhi – 110034, hence kindly provide the information whether the
information provided by you wrt
reference number:- सूअवि/45/1234 Dated 09/12/2016 has been provided for all the
branches of State Bank of India. (YES/ NO)
8.
That the Hon’ble PIO wrt reference number:- सूअवि/45/1234 Dated 09/12/2016 has informed that, there is NO
account with State Bank of India who has given this particular address viz., AZ
741 Rani Bagh Delhi – 110034, hence kindly provide the information whether such
an account was active or closed/ or transferred/ or moved/ or shifted etc from
State Bank of India (any branch) from 01/01/2015 to till date. (YES/ NO)
In
this regard it is most humbly & respectfully submitted that I simply want a
response from the bank in 'yes' or 'no' and nothing more than a 'yes' or 'no'.
It
is further submitted that, I required this information on account of the
suspicion that certain malpractices are being routed through this bank account which
could be money laundering.
It
is prayed before the Hon'ble PIO that I am an informed citizen, wanting to get
information in the public interest. And I further respectfully emphasize that I
does not want any statement of account and that I does not even want to know
whether it is a cash credit or savings bank or term loan or a current account.
It
is further prayed that, I just want to get a response from the bank in 'yes' or
'no' on the point mentioned in this RTI i.e., whether there is any account-holder
in the bank with the address AZ 741 Rani Bagh Delhi – 110034
CONFIDENTIAL CLAUSE
The
details of this application/appeal may kindly be treated in strictest
confidence and should not be revealed to any other person/s, except to the
third party u/s 11 of RTI Act 2005, if need be. If any person seeks copy of
this application a notice should be served to me u/s 11 and I should be heard
before parting with details. PIO and FAA are duty bound not to permit
unauthorized access to govt. records. It is respectfully submitted that I shall
hold PIO/deemed PIO/FAA responsible for any unauthorized leakage of details of
this application.
CITATION
As
per Decision No. CIC/VS/A/2013/000384/05739 it was held by CIC that, “7.The
appellant said that he just wants to get a response from the bank in 'yes' or
'no' on the point mentioned in the RTI application, i.e., whether there is any
accountholder in the bank with the addresses mentioned in the RTI application.
Decision:
8. The respondent is directed to
provide to the appellant, within 30 days of this order, the information sought
as per para 7 above in context of the RTI application." (Annexed for the kind perusal
of this Hon’ble PIO)
I am sending a Blank
Postal Order no. 16F 192823
of Rs. 10 dated 09/11/2016 is
attached herewith. Kindly fill the PIO details as it is the duty
of PIO to provide reasonable assistance u/s 5 (3) of
the RTI act to applicant. The requested information shall be supplied
free of charge in case the same could not be supplied within 30 days u/s 7(6)
of RTI Act 2005. Kindly provide the information to each point separately.
Please do not club the information to the points even if the information is
repeated.
Enclosed:- (1) Decision No. CIC/VS/A/2013/000384/05739
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o Q-7/77, GF,
Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email:
aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
First Appeal against Electoral Office for calling for
Inspection when this right is NOT exercised & malafidely denial of
information under Right to Information Act 2005
To Dated 22/09/2016
First Appellate
Authority,
District Election Officer / D.M. (North),
Govt of N.C.T. of Delhi, 1,
Kripa Narain Marg, Civil Lines,
New Delhi-110054
Sub:- First Appeal u/s 19(1) of RTI Act 2005
wrt reference
number:- No.F.1/AERO/AC-17/2016/2134 Dated 21/09/2016
Respected Sir,
FACTS:
I have filed RTI
application dated 16.08.2016 for which reply was provided to me vide reference number:- No.F.1/AERO/AC-17/2016/2134 Dated 21/09/2016
In my RTI I told
them that, I checked Electoral Roll, 2014 of Assembly Constituency, 14 - RANI
BAGH, (GEN) NCT of Delhi with the Qualifying Date 01-01-2016.
On page 37 there is a List of Additions. (Annexed for the kind perusal
of this Hon’ble Public Information Officer). It is requested that following
information may kindly be supplied under RTI Act 2005 as per your records :-
At point no.3 of my
RTI (annexed for perusal) I asked “Kindly supply the certified copy of
all the documents submitted by all these people within this list of additions
to the voter list”
I received the reply
vide above reference number:-
No.F.1/AERO/AC-17/2016/2134 Dated 21/09/2016
that ”the applicant is advised to visit the AC and inspect the
record personally on any working day convenient to him”
It means the PIO
decided the said application in terms of Sec-7(1) and decided to supply the
information to me. Accordingly I have been called for inspection. However, on
22.09.2016 I visited AC to inspect the records based on which
the said addition of 12 names (annexed for perusal) in voter’s list was done
but these were not produced before me, though the PIO had taken the decision to
supply the same to me during inspection.
GROUNDS:
That I have not
asked for inspection, but sought certified copy of all the documents submitted
by all these people within this list of additions to the voter’s list (list of
these 12 additions have been annexed for perusal) by exercising the right as
contained in Section-2(j)(ii), whereas PIO called me for inspection (as
provided in Sec-2(j)(i), which right to information I have not invoked or
demanded from PIO.
PIO did not supply
copy of information demanded by me vide my application dated 16.08.2016. PIO
also did not produce the relevant records containing the documents pertaining
to addition of 12 persons name in voter's list during inspection. (Annexed for
your kind perusal)
Thus, PIO malafidely
denied me information under the guise of offering inspection and physically not
produced the relevant public records before me for inspection. Thus, PIO denied
the information to me without recording any reasons for such denial as also
without any justified reason.
Since the names were
newly added in the voter's list, such action by the public authority is based
on relevant documents & records and the PIO malafidely denied those
documents without any justified reason. Public authority totally failed to
supply the information sought by me within 30 days form the date of submission
of RTI application, render the public authority to supply me information free
of cost.
PRAYER:
(1)
This Hon'ble Appellate Authority may
therefore be pleased to direct the PIO to supply me the certified copy of all
the documents submitted by all these 12 people to get their names added in the
voter’s list as demanded by me vide point no.3 of my RTI Application dated 16.08.2016,
free of cost within 10 days from the date of decision of this appeal. (annexed
for perusal)
(2)
Action & Penalty against erring
PIO as per section 20 of RTI Rules’2005
Enclosed:-
(1)
RTI Application by me dated 16.08.2016
(2)
List of Additions as discussed above.
(3)
Reply by PIO vide reference number:- No.F.1/AERO/AC-17/2016/2134 Dated 21/09/2016
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o
Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
RTI to get details of Noting Sheets & Communications with
Opposite Party
To Dated:-
10/10/2016
Public Information
Officer
Assembly Constituency-17, Rohini
Mangol Puri, Near Rohini
Delhi-110086
Sub:- Request for information u/s 6 & 7
of RTI Act 2005
wrt
reference number:- No.F.1/AERO/AC-17/2016/2143 Dated 19/09/2016
Respected Sir/ Madam,
It is
requested that following information may kindly be supplied under RTI Act 2005 wrt reference number:- No.F.1/AERO/AC-17/2016/2143 Dated 19/09/2016:-
1.
Kindly supply certified copy of
entire copy of records, including noting sheets and all the correspondence
pertaining to RTI application dated 15.08.2016 filed by ATUR CHATUR C/o Q-7/77,
GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
I am sending a Blank
Postal Order no. 32F 127635
of Rs. 10 dated 18/09/2016 is
attached herewith. Kindly fill the PIO details as it is the duty
of PIO to provide reasonable assistance u/s 5 (3) of
the RTI act to applicant. The requested information shall be supplied
free of charge in case the same could not be supplied within 30 days u/s 7(6)
of RTI Act 2005. Please do not club the information to the points even if the information
is repeated.
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o
Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
When PIO malafidely denies RTI Applicant, the access to FAA
To Dated:-
20/11/2016
Public Information
Officer
Office of Chief Electoral
Officer of Delhi,
Old Stephan’s College Building,
Kashmere Gate,
New Delhi-110006
Sub:- Forwarding of the enclosed First Appeal
to the concerned First Appellate Authority. Reference: RTI Application Dated: 16/08/2016
Respected Sir/ Madam,
On 16/08/2016
I sent a RTI Application to your esteemed office (annexed for perusal) which
was forwarded &/or re-forwarded, and subsequently, I got a reply from AERO,
AC-17 Rohini vide reference number No.F.1/AERO/AC-17/2016/2143 Dated 16/10/2016
With
reference to aforesaid RTI Application, I would like to draw your kind
attention towards the provision of section 7(3)(b) read along with
section 7(8)(iii) of the RTI Act, whereby, while responding to my RTI
Application, you as a PIO (or the PIO chosen/ selected/ forwarded by you) were
supposed to have provided the particulars of the FAA, but please note that it
has not been done so, and as such, you are hereby kindly requested to forward
the enclosed first appeal to the concerned First Appellate Authority. Thanking
you,
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o
Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
NO Reply to RTI by the PIO with malafide intention
To Dated 21/12/2016
First Appellate
Authority,
District Election Officer / D.M. (North),
Govt of N.C.T. of Delhi,
1, Kripa Narain Marg, Civil
Lines,
New Delhi-110054
Sub:- First
Appeal u/s 19(1) of RTI Act 2005 due to NO REPLY RECEIVED from PIO &
wrt ref no:- No.F.1(23)/RTI/SDM/Election/North-West/2016/1234
Dt 29/11/2016
Respected Sir,
(1)
That I have NOT received reply to my
RTI request dated 10/11/2016 sent to AERO/AC-17 (Annexed RTI & Postal Proof
for your kind perusal).
(2)
That on 10.11.2016 I sent a RTI
request to AERO/AC-17/Rohini/Delhi-86. Till today I have NOT received reply to
this RTI request. However & surprisingly I received a letter from
DEO/D.M.(North-West)/Govt of NCT Delhi/1 Kripa Narain Marg, Delhi as per which
my RTI was transferred back to AC-17 i.e., to ERO/SPIO/AC-17(Rohini) vide
reference number No.F.1(23)/RTI/SDM/Election/North/2016/1234 Dated 29/11/2016
and vide Transfer of Application under RTI. 2005 (ID No. 23/2016). That I
received no other communication till date wrt this RTI.
(3)
That it is my utmost surprise that I
sent my original RTI to AC-17 & the questions were directly answerable by
them but still the concerned PIO chose to stay silent & neither provided me
the requisite information nor informed me till date the fate of my RTI
application.
(4)
That this concerned PIO with malafide
intention has not provided information which is held by their office pertaining
to this RTI request which also sounds suspicion. Hence, this Hon'ble PIO has denied
me the information held with their esteemed authority at their AC-17 office.
This also hints that PIO with malafide intention is deliberately trying to
withhold & deny the information pertaining to AC-17 authority which their
office holds.
PRAYER:
(1)
To pass necessary directions in the
light of above facts & circumstances
(2)
The PIO be directed to immediately
release this information which he has denied.
(3)
To initiate action against the erring
PIO u/s 20 of RTI Act’2005
(4)
The further information shall be
provided free of cost i.e., the applicant/ undersigned be exempted in view of
section 7(6) of RTI Act 2005 from payment of any further fee payable by me for
supplying of requested information on account of default on the part of PIO to
supply information within prescribed time.
(5)
To issue directions to AERO/PIO to
freeze all the records/ documents wrt No.F.1/AERO/AC-17/2016/2143 Dated 11/08/2016
because this current RTI which was malafide denied by Hon’ble PIO mentions this
number in its heading & the PIO with malafide intent is making different
excuses/ efforts to deny this information.
Any other reliefs/
order as this Hon’ble FAA deems fit.
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o
Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
Leakage of RTI, NO Reply to RTI & Freezing of Records due
to malafide denial by PIO with malafide intention to protect the wrongdoers
To Dated 22/12/2016
First Appellate
Authority,
District Election Officer / D.M. (North),
Govt of N.C.T. of Delhi,
1, Kripa Narain Marg, Civil
Lines,
New Delhi-110054
Sub:- First
Appeal u/s 19(1) of RTI Act 2005 due to NO REPLY RECEIVED from PIO for my RTI
dated 26/09/2016 (annexed for your kind perusal)
Respected Sir,
(5)
That I have NOT received reply to my
RTI request dated 26/09/2016 sent to AERO/AC-17 (Annexed RTI & Postal Proof
for your kind perusal).
(6)
That to my utmost shock &
surprise I have received neither reply nor any communication till date wrt this
RTI from the concerned Hon’ble PIO.
(7)
That this concerned PIO with malafide
intention has not provided information which is held by their office. This also
hints that PIO with malafide intention is deliberately trying to withhold &
deny the information requested by me under the RTI Act’2005.
(8)
That besides denying my RTI
completely neither any communication was sent to me nor I was informed about
the first appellate authority so as to fully jeopardize me of my fundamental
right thereby making all possible efforts by Hon’ble PIO to deny information
under RTI Act’2015.
PRAYER:
(6)
To pass necessary directions in the
light of above facts & circumstances
(7)
The PIO be directed to immediately
release this information which he has denied.
(8)
To initiate action against the erring
PIO u/s 20 of RTI Act’2005
(9)
The further information shall be provided
free of cost i.e., the applicant/ undersigned be exempted in view of section
7(6) of RTI Act 2005 from payment of any further fee payable by me for
supplying of requested information on account of default on the part of PIO to
supply information within prescribed time.
(10)To issue directions
to Office of concerned Hon’ble AERO/PIO AC-17 (emphasize) to
freeze all the records/ documents requested within this RTI request & to
keep those in safe custody till disposal of available remedies under the RTI
Act’2005.
(11)To issue directions
to Office of concerned Hon’ble AERO/PIO AC-17 (emphasize) to not
to part away/ destroy/ mutilate/ tamper with any of the records/ documents
requested within this RTI request.
(12)To take into
consideration all the documents submitted by me which are in the custody of the
concerned Hon’ble PIO & thereby release the information in the public
interest.
(13)To issue directions
to the concerned Hon’ble PIO to also provide me names of al those parties/
authorities to whom my RTI was leaked & discussed & communicated.
(14)To issue directions
to the concerned Hon’ble PIO to also provide me all communications with all/any
person to whom my RTI was leaked & discussed & communicated under the
relevant provisions of the Right to Information Act, 2005 & provisions
contained therein.
Any other reliefs/
order as this Hon’ble FAA deems fit.
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o
Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
PIO playing hide & seek game with RTI Applicant / PIO transfers
RTI to another public authority when the information is held by them
To Dated 27/12/2016
First Appellate
Authority,
District Election Officer / D.M. (North),
Govt of N.C.T. of Delhi,
1, Kripa Narain Marg, Civil
Lines,
New Delhi-110054
Sub:- First
Appeal u/s 19(1) of RTI Act 2005 due to NO REPLY RECEIVED from PIO AC-17 &also
No.F.1(359)/RTI/SDM/Election/North/2016/137 Dt 23/10/2016
Respected Sir,
(9)
That I have NOT received reply to my
RTI request dated 30/09/2016 from O/o PIO/AERO/AC-17 (Annexed RTI & Postal
Proof for your kind perusal).
(10)That on 30.09.2016 I
sent a RTI request to AERO/AC-17/Rohini/Delhi-86. Till today I have NOT
received reply to this RTI request from the O/o PIO/AERO/AC-17 as the most
important documents are held by them vis-à-vis concerned RTI. However &
surprisingly I received a letter from DEO/D.M.(North)/Govt of NCT Delhi/1 Kripa
Narain Marg, Delhi as per which my RTI was transferred back to AC-17 i.e., to
ERO/SPIO/AC-17(Rohini) vide reference number No.F.1(359)/RTI/SDM/Election /North/2016/137
Dated 23/10/2016 and vide Transfer of Application under RTI. 2005 (ID No. 359/2016).
(11)That the information
which CEO/Kashmere gate provided in this respect is fine but the information
available with PIO/AERO/AC-17 has been held back which strongly hints malafide
intent of the concerned PIO/AERO/AC-17 as:-
(12)That when the matter
directly relates to PIO/AERO/AC-17 & even my concerned RTI mentions that
number No.F.1/AERO/AC-17/2016/2143 Dated 16/08/2016 within the
heading of the concerned RTI itself then what prompted the PIO/AERO/AC-17 to
play this hide & seek game on one hand and withholding the information
which is available in his office on the other hand. The information which is
still available in his esteemed office pertaining to the reference number No.F.1/AERO/AC-17/2016/2143 Dated 16/08/2016 asked through
concerned RTI has not been provided to me within the time limit under the
proviso of RTI Act’2005 which hints malafide intention of PIO/AERO/AC-17.
(13)That it is my utmost
surprise that I sent my original RTI to AC-17 & the questions were directly
answerable by them but still the concerned PIO chose to stay silent & neither
provided me the requisite information nor informed me till date the fate of my
RTI application.
(14)That this concerned
PIO with malafide intention has not provided information which is held by their
office pertaining to this RTI request which also sounds suspicion. Hence, this
Hon'ble PIO has denied me the information held with their esteemed authority at
their AC-17 office. This also hints that PIO with malafide intention is
deliberately trying to withhold & deny the information pertaining to AC-17 authority
which their office holds.
PRAYER:
(15)To pass necessary
directions in the light of above facts & circumstances
(16)The PIO/AERO/AC-14
be directed to immediately release this information which he has denied.
(17)To initiate action
against the erring PIO/AERO/AC-17 u/s 20 of RTI Act’2005
(18)The further information
shall be provided free of cost i.e., the applicant/ undersigned be exempted in
view of section 7(6) of RTI Act 2005 from payment of any further fee payable by
me for supplying of requested information on account of default on the part of
PIO to supply information within prescribed time.
(19)To issue directions
to AERO/PIO/AC-17 to freeze all the records/ documents wrt No.F.1/AERO/AC-17/2016/2143
Dated 16/08/2016 because this current RTI which was malafide denied by Hon’ble
PIO mentions this number in its heading & the PIO with malafide intent is
making different excuses/ efforts to deny this information.
Any other reliefs/
order as this Hon’ble FAA deems fit.
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o
Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
PIO does NOT mentions the date while replying to various RTI
Applications of same RTI Applicant in order to confuse the RTI Applicant
To Dated:-
30/09/2015
Public Information
Officer
Office of Hon’ble First
Appellate Authority / ADM (NORTH),
ALIPUR, Delhi-110036
Sub:- Request for information u/s 6 & 7
of RTI Act 2005
Respected Sir/
Madam,
BACKGROUND INFROMATION
Respected Sir, the Office letter head of
your esteemed Hon’ble First Appellate Authority/ ADM(North-West) KANJHAWALA,
Delhi-110081 was used to send me two first appeal hearing notice vide reference
numbers:- No.F/ADM(N)/Appeal(RTI)/143/2016/1587-89
Dated 08.08.2016 and
, No.F/ADM(N)/Appeal(RTI)/163/2016/1590-91
Dated 08.08.2016 respectively. In reference to this, kindly supply me the
following information under the RTI Act’2005 as follows:-
(1)
Kindly supply me the
date written on my First Appeal associated with this reference number No.F/ADM(N)/Appeal(RTI)/143/2016/1587-89
Dated 08.08.2016.
(2)
Kindly supply me the
first appeal decision associated with the reference number No.F/ADM(N)/Appeal(RTI)/143/2016/1587-89
Dated 08.08.2016
(3)
Kindly supply me the
date written on my First Appeal associated with this reference number No.F/ADM(N)/Appeal(RTI)/163/2016/1590-91
Dated 08.08.2016.
(4)
Kindly supply me the
first appeal decision associated with the reference number No.F/ADM(N)/Appeal(RTI)/163/2016/1590-91
Dated 08.08.2016
(5)
Kindly provide the
information to each point separately. Please do not club the information to the
points even if the information is repeated.
I am sending a Blank
Postal Order no. 32F 918327
of Rs. 10 dated 08/07/2016 is
attached herewith. Kindly fill the PIO details as it is the duty
of PIO to provide reasonable assistance u/s 5 (3) of
the RTI act to applicant. The requested information shall be supplied
free of charge in case the same could not be supplied within 30 days u/s 7(6)
of RTI Act 2005. Kindly provide the information to each point separately.
Please do not club the information to the points even if the information is
repeated.
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o
Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
Status of First Appeal of RTI Applicant and ATR (Action Taken
Report)
To Dated:-
31/12/2016
Public Information
Officer
Office of Hon’ble District Election
Officer / D.M. (North),
Govt of N.C.T. of Delhi, 1,
Kripa Narain Marg, Civil Lines,
New Delhi-110054
Sub:- Request for information u/s 6 & 7
of RTI Act 2005
Respected Sir/ Madam,
Kindly supply the
following information under the RTI Act’2005 as follows:-
(6)
On 31/10/2016, I
sent a first appeal in favor of First Appellate Authority, District Election
Officer / D.M. (North), Govt of N.C.T. of Delhi, 1, Kripa Narain Marg, Civil
Lines, New Delhi-110054 vide postal receipt number RD928374646IN. Kindly
provide the certified copy of action taken report & the status of this
first appeal mentioned within this para. (annexed for your kind perusal as
annexure A)
(7)
Kindly supply the certified
copy of the say/remarks submitted or submissions made by PIO before First
Appellate Authority in compliance of Section-19(5) of RTI Act, 2005, with
respect to First Appeal dated 31/10/2016 as mentioned in point (1) above
(8)
On 01/11/2016, I
sent a first appeal in favor of First Appellate Authority, District Election
Officer / D.M. (North), Govt of N.C.T. of Delhi, 1, Kripa Narain Marg, Civil
Lines, New Delhi-110054 vide postal receipt number RD928373645IN. Kindly
provide certified copy of the action taken report & the status of this
first appeal mentioned within this para. (annexed for your kind perusal as
annexure B)
(9)
Kindly supply the certified
copy of the say/remarks submitted or submissions made by PIO before First
Appellate Authority in compliance of Section-19(5) of RTI Act, 2005, with
respect to First Appeal dated 01/11/2016 as mentioned in point (3) above
(10)On
02/11/2016, I sent a first appeal in favor of First Appellate Authority,
District Election Officer / D.M. (North), Govt of N.C.T. of Delhi, 1, Kripa
Narain Marg, Civil Lines, New Delhi-110054 vide postal receipt number RD928374645IN.
Kindly provide certified copy of the action taken report & the status of
this first appeal mentioned within this para. (annexed for your kind perusal as
annexure C)
(11)Kindly
supply the certified copy of the say/remarks submitted or submissions made by
PIO before First Appellate Authority in compliance of Section-19(5) of RTI Act,
2005, with respect to First Appeal dated 02/11/2016 as mentioned in point (5)
above
I am sending a Blank
Postal Order no. 32F 193230
of Rs. 10 dated 12/10/2016 is
attached herewith. Kindly fill the PIO details as it is the duty
of PIO to provide reasonable assistance u/s 5 (3) of
the RTI act to applicant. The requested information shall be supplied
free of charge in case the same could not be supplied within 30 days u/s 7(6)
of RTI Act 2005. Kindly provide the information to each point separately.
Please do not club the information to the points even if the information is
repeated.
ANNEXURES:-
Annexure A:- First Appeal dated
31/10/2016 to D.M. (North), Civil Lines, Delhi-54 mentioned in point (1) above
Annexure B:- First Appeal dated
01/11/2016 to D.M. (North), Civil Lines, Delhi-54 mentioned in point (3) above
Annexure C:- First Appeal dated
02/11/2016 to D.M. (North), Civil Lines, Delhi-54 mentioned in point (5) above
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o
Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
FAA helps corrupt/ malafide PIO – Use of RTI to fix
accountability, transparency & responsibility (to be used in High Court
Writ)
To
Dated:- 31/01/2017
Public Information
Officer
Office of Hon’ble District Magistrate
(NW)/ FAA Sh. Surya Pratap Ji
North West District, Kanjhawala,
New Delhi-110081
Sub:- Request for information u/s 6 & 7
of RTI Act 2005
(1)
Kindly supply the certified copy of all the documents
relied upon vis-a-vis order vide Appeal No. 27/RTI/DM/NW/2016/42 Dated:
18/01//16
(2)
Kindly supply the certified copy of all the documents
relied upon vis-a-vis order vide Appeal No. 28/RTI/DM/NW/2016/43 Dated:
18/01//16
(3)
Kindly supply the certified copy of all the documents
relied upon vis-a-vis order vide Appeal No. 29/RTI/DM/NW/2016/44 Dated:
18/01//16
(4)
Kindly supply the certified copy of all the documents
relied upon vis-a-vis order vide Appeal No. 26/RTI/DM/NW/2016/41 Dated:
18/01//16 Kindly note that I have not yet received the copy of the
order on my fourth appeal which was also scheduled on 18/01/2016 so I am unsure
whether it was numbered as 41 OR 45 so kindly send all the documents relied
upon vis-a-vis this order including the order sheet pertaining to that fourth
appeal also.
(5)
As per Appeal No. 27/RTI/DM/NW/2016/42 Dated: 18/01//16
at Point no. 3 it has been written erroneously/ or otherwise that, “The
applicant submitted that he is withdrawing his RTI appeal as his grievance his
been resolved. Request accepted” Kindly supply the certified photocopy
of this RTI appeal which has been erred/otherwise/said to have been withdrawn.
(6)
Kindly note that I also sent three first appeals on
dates viz., 31/10/2016, 01/11/2016 and 02/11/2016 (all three enclosed) but out
of these three first appeals I think one or more of them have been missed as I
have not been called/informed for one or more of those first appeals so I
humbly request your esteemed authority to kindly check dates on all my first
appeals whose hearing was fixed on 18/01/2016 in order to find out on which of
these first appeals (FA) out of FA's dated 31/10/2016, 01/11/2016 and 02/11/2016
I have not been called/apprised so that I can re-forward you that/those first
appeals for which hearing was not fixed (or for which I was not informed) for
your kind consideration in the interest of justice & fair play.
(7)
Kindly supply the certified copy of the say/remarks
submitted or submissions made by PIO before First Appellate Authority in
compliance of Section-19(5) of RTI Act, 2005, with respect to my First Appeal
dated 31/10/2016
(8)
Kindly supply the certified copy of the say/remarks
submitted or submissions made by PIO before First Appellate Authority in
compliance of Section-19(5) of RTI Act, 2005, with respect to my First Appeal
dated 01/11/2016
(9)
Kindly supply the certified copy of the say/remarks
submitted or submissions made by PIO before First Appellate Authority in
compliance of Section-19(5) of RTI Act, 2005, with respect to my First Appeal
dated 02/11/2016
(10)As per appeal no. 28 discussed in
point 2 above PIO was directed to send me reply within 7 days which is not yet
received so kindly supply me the certified copy of this reply by PIO.
(11)As per appeal no. 29 discussed in
point 3 above PIO was directed to send me reply within 7 days which is not yet
received so kindly supply me the certified copy of this reply by PIO.
(12)As per appeal no. 26 discussed in
point 4 above if
the PIO was directed to send me reply within 7 days then kindly supply me the
certified copy of this reply by PIO.
I am sending a Blank
Postal Order no. 16F 092938
of Rs. 10 dated 09/02/2016 is
attached herewith. Kindly fill the PIO details as it is the duty
of PIO to provide reasonable assistance u/s 5 (3) of
the RTI act to applicant. The requested information shall be supplied
free of charge in case the same could not be supplied within 30 days u/s 7(6)
of RTI Act 2005. Kindly provide the information to each point separately.
Please do not club the information to the points even if the information is
repeated.
ANNEXURES:-
Annexure
A:- First
Appeal dated 31/10/2016
Annexure
B:- First
Appeal dated 01/11/2016
Annexure
C:- First
Appeal dated 02/11/2016
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o Q-7/77, GF,
Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email:
aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
PIO malafidely calls for Inspection but RTI Applicant is
shown only Incorrect Information
To Dated:-
04/11/2016
Assistant Electoral
Registration Officer
AC-17, Rohini
Mangol Puri
Delhi-110086
Sub:- Request for information u/s 6 & 7
of RTI Act 2005
wrt
reference number:- No.F.1/AERO/AC-17/2016/2134
Dt 16/08/2016
Respected Sir/ Madam,
It is
requested that following information may kindly be supplied under RTI Act 2005 wrt reference number:- No.F.1/AERO/AC-17/2016/2134 Dt 16/08/2016
& this number is not being repeated below for the sake of brevity :-
1.
Kindly supply information, “Does your
office maintain the records?”
2.
Kindly supply the name, designation
of officer responsible to maintain the records wrt the additions in voter list.
3.
Kindly supply the information i.e.,
the time period for maintenance of records?
4.
Kindly supply the name, designation,
rank, belt number of officer responsible for maintenance of these records?
5.
Kindly supply the information wrt
punishment provisions within your office if a RTI Applicant is ”advised
to visit the AC and inspect the record personally on any working day convenient
to him” but when he reaches AC as requested then for hours he is made
to sit / wait / shown only rejected applications to be searched from?
6.
Kindly supply the information wrt
punishment provisions within your office if during any such visits to your
branch any such candidate whose information is being searched is secretly
informed by any of your official regarding the RTI applicant's visit to your
office?
7.
Kindly supply the information wrt
punishment provisions within your office if the record of any candidate is
deliberately hidden or misplaced?
8.
Kindly supply the information wrt
punishment provisions within your office if record of any candidate is/are
changed at a later date i.e., punishment provisions within your office wrt any
form of tampering with records?
I am sending a Blank
Postal Order no. 32F 948374
of Rs. 10 dated 14/08/2016 is
attached herewith. Kindly fill the PIO details as it is the duty
of PIO to provide reasonable assistance u/s 5 (3) of the RTI act
to applicant. The requested information shall be supplied free of charge in
case the same could not be supplied within 30 days u/s 7(6) of RTI Act 2005.
Please do not club the information to the points even if the information is
repeated.
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o
Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
PIO has NO intention to provide information & makes
excuses before FAA – This RTI (below) tries to fix his lies vis-à-vis malafide
intention
To Dated:-
11/11/2016
Assistant Electoral
Registration Officer
AC-17, Rohini
Mangol
Puri
Delhi-110086
Sub:- Request
for information u/s 6 & 7 of RTI Act
2005
wrt reference
number:- No.F.1/AERO/AC-17/2016/2134 Dated 16/08/2016
Respected Sir/ Madam,
It is requested that following information may kindly be
supplied under RTI Act 2005 wrt
reference number:- No.F.1/AERO/AC-17/2016/2134
Dated 16/08/2016 :-
That within point 5 of reply vide No.F.1/AERO/AC-17/2015/4349
Dated:-10-11-16, the Hon'ble PIO informed that, "when the
documents were traced the applicant was informed telephonically many times, but
he did not turn up to see the documents in person." Hence I request
that I may kindly be provided certified copy of all the documents which I asked
through my original RTI concerned to No.F.1/AERO/AC-17/2016/2134
Dated 16/08/2016 & which have been said to be traced by Hon'ble PIO
vide No.F.1/AERO/AC-17/2015/4349 Dated:-10-11-16
I am sending a Blank Postal Order no.
16F 837464 of Rs. 10 dated 11/11/2016 is attached herewith.
Kindly fill the PIO details as it is the duty of PIO to provide
reasonable assistance u/s 5 (3) of the RTI act to applicant. The
requested information shall be supplied free of charge in case the same could
not be supplied within 30 days u/s 7(6) of RTI Act 2005.
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o Q-7/77, GF,
Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
Two Collusive PIO’s – one PIO transfers RTI to another unrelated
PIO & that unrelated PIO denies information citing NOT available instead of
honoring sec-6(3) of RTI Act 2005
To Dated:-
21/012/201l6
Assistant Electoral
Registration Officer
AC-15 (Janak Puri)
C-Block District Centre
New Delhi-110071
Sub:- Request for information u/s 6 & 7
of RTI Act 2005
Respected Sir/ Madam,
I
received a RTI response from your office vide reference number No.F-15/VC-15/2016/608
Dated:-19/12/2016. Since your’s is an assembly constituency AC-15 hence
in the above reference number VC-15 might mean a typo error & correct may
be AC-15 if I am correct and in that case the reference number is expected to
be No.F-15/VC-15/2016/608 Dated:-19/12/2016. I did not sent RTI
directly to your office but since your office has supplied me information under
RTI Act vide the above reference number hence you must have received this RTI
from another office. It is requested that following information may kindly be
supplied under RTI Act 2005:-
9.
Please provide me certified copy of
communication letter which your office received from another office wrt the RTI
which you have replied vide above reference no.
10.
Please provide me copy of that letter
u/s 6(3) of RTI Act’2005 which you received from another office wrt this RTI
which you have replied vide above reference no
11.
Please provide me certified copy of
my RTI request which is now in your office records for which you have replied
vide above reference no.
I am sending a Blank
Postal Order no. 32F 837464
of Rs. 10 dated 17/12/2016 is
attached herewith. Kindly fill the PIO details as it is the duty
of PIO to provide reasonable assistance u/s 5 (3) of
the RTI act to applicant. The requested information shall be supplied
free of charge in case the same could not be supplied within 30 days u/s 7(6)
of RTI Act 2005. Please do not club the information to the points even if the
information is repeated.
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o
Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
RTI on Voter ID Card (Election Office) – Concealment of True Legal
Identity by Wife (Misrepresentation r/w People’s Representation Act, 1951)
To Dated:-
29/12/2016
Assistant Electoral
Registration Officer
AC-17, Rohini
Mangol
Puri
Delhi-110086
Sub:- Request for information u/s 6 & 7
of RTI Act 2005
Respected Sir/ Madam,
I
checked Electoral Roll, 2016 of Assembly Constituency, 17 - ROHINI, (GEN)
NCT of Delhi with the Qualifying Date 01-01-2016. On page 37
there is a List of Additions. (Annexed for the kind perusal of this
Hon’ble Public Information Officer). It is requested that following information
may kindly be supplied under RTI Act 2005 as per your records :-
12.
Kindly supply certified copy of documents
containing punishment provisions for any person who misrepresents or conceals
his/her true identity for getting his name included in electoral rolls.
13.
Kindly supply the certified copy of
all the documents submitted by this person named PATIVRATA DEVI R/o AZ-747, Rani
Bagh, Delhi-110034 within this list of additions to the voter list.
I am sending a Blank
Postal Order no. 32F 374646
of Rs. 10 dated 28/12/2016 is
attached herewith. Kindly fill the PIO details as it
is the duty of PIO to provide reasonable assistance u/s 5 (3) of
the RTI act to applicant. The requested information shall be
supplied free of charge in case the same could not be supplied within 30 days
u/s 7(6) of RTI Act 2005. Please do not club the information to the points even
if the information is repeated.
Enclosed:- Page 37 (List of
Additions) as discussed above
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o
Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
RTI on UIDAI (Aadhar Card) – Concealment/ Misrepresentation
of True Legal Identity by Wife
To
Dated:- 16/11/2016
Public Information
Officer, Unique Identification Authority of India
UIDAI, Government of India, 3rd
Floor, Tower II,
Jeevan
Bharti Building, Connaught Circus, Delhi-110001
Sub:- Request for information u/s 6 & 7
of RTI Act 2005
Respected Sir/ Madam,
BACKGROUND:- It is informed
that there is only one person in entire India by the name “PATIVRATA DEVI”.
This is such a unique name. It is also informed that there is only one person
in entire India by the name “JHOOTHI DEVI” This is also such a unique name. It
is respectfully further informed that interestingly both the above two names
are been/ have (had) been / being used by one person i.e., one person having
two completely different named identity card/s in same/different government
authorities of India which is criminal offence under relevant provisions of IPC
&/or CrPC &/or also as per Representation of the People Act. It is
informed that the person named “JHOOTHI DEVI” changed her name from “JHOOTHI
DEVI” to “PATIVRATA DEVI” in the year 2009 by way of filing court affidavit
& newspaper publication (which was never challenged by anyone) & then
till 2015 she kept using the name “PATIVRATA DEVI” (Enclosures 1 to 10 attached
for the kind perusal of this Hon’ble PIO) It is requested that following
information may kindly be supplied under RTI Act 2005:-
14.
Is it a criminal offence for one person
to possess two aadhar cards with two different names at the same time?
15.
Kindly supply the information wrt
punishment provisions as per point 1 above.
16.
If a person possesses two aadhar
cards then which one is treated as valid the first one or the subsequent one?
17.
Kindly supply the aadhar card number
of this person named “PATIVRATA DEVI”
18.
Kindly supply the certified copy,
UIDAI enrolment number for this person named “PATIVRATA DEVI”.
19.
Kindly supply the aadhar card number
of this person named “JHOOTHI DEVI” as per your records.
20.
Kindly supply the certified copy,
UIDAI enrolment number for this person named “JHOOTHI DEVI” as per your
records.
21.
Kindly supply the information whether
the aadhar card of “PATIVRATA DEVI” has been linked to her voter I Card.
22.
Kindly supply the information whether
the aadhar card of “JHOOTHI DEVI” has been linked to her voter I Card.
23.
Kindly supply all the certified
copies, documents, date of enrolment in your records related to this person
named “PATIVRATA DEVI”
24.
Kindly supply the certified copies,
documents, date of enrolment in your records related to this person named “JHOOTHI
DEVI”
25.
Kindly supply the information whether
the aadhar card associated with the name “PATIVRATA DEVI” has been found to be
bogus.
26.
Kindly supply the information whether
the aadhar card associated with the name “JHOOTHI DEVI” has been found to be
bogus.
27.
Kindly supply the action taken report
by your office based on the findings & revelations clearly explained
through this RTI request.
28.
Kindly supply the certified copies
regarding illegalily to get aadhar card prepared by misleading the government
agencies & action as per the rules?
29.
Kindly supply what action your
offices take on finding a bogus aadhar card.
30.
Kindly supply the punishment
prescribed under the act for any officer of your department trying to hide the
information wrt a bogus aadhar card.
31.
Kindly supply the punishment
prescribed under the act for any officer of your department trying to tamper
with the records wrt a bogus aadhar card.
32.
Since possession of two id’s with two
different names by a same person is a criminal offence hence kindly supply the
certified copy of the action taken report based on this RTI.
33.
If any aadhar card is found to be
bogus then please provide the certified copy of notice &/or calls &/or
written communications sent by your office to this person.
34.
Kindly provide certified copies of
all calls &/or written communications to & from between your office
& this person due to above info.
Enclosures:-
1.
Affidavit of name change from “JHOOTHI
DEVI” to “PATIVRATA DEVI” dated 31st Dec’2009
2.
Back side of above Affidavit
3.
Super Enlarged view of newspaper ad
of name from “JHOOTHI DEVI” to “PATIVRATA DEVI”
4.
Enlarged view of above newspaper ad
5.
Photocopy of above newspaper ad
6.
Signatures of “PATIVRATA DEVI” dated
04/01/2015
7.
Signatures of “PATIVRATA DEVI” dated
02/01/2015
8.
Signatures of “PATIVRATA DEVI” dated
07/01/2015
9.
Handwriting of “PATIVRATA DEVI” for
which the date is on next enclosure
10.
Signatures of “PATIVRATA DEVI” dated
26/12/2010
I am sending a Blank
Postal Order no. 32F 273645
of Rs. 10 dated 15/11/2016 is
attached herewith. Kindly fill the PIO details as it is the duty
of PIO to provide reasonable assistance u/s 5 (3) of
the RTI act to applicant. The requested information shall be supplied
free of charge in case the same could not be supplied within 30 days u/s 7(6)
of RTI Act 2005. Please do not club the information to the points even if the
information is repeated.
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o
Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
Misleading information by PIO (UIDAI) – malafide intention /
tampering with records
To Dated 18/09/2016
First Appellate
Authority,
Assistant Director
General,
Unique
Identification Authority of India,
Jeevan Bharti
Building, 2nd Floor, Tower-I,
Connaught Circus, New
Delhi-110001
Sub:- with
reference to No.5(5)/47/234/2014-E &U-II Dated: 11/09/2016
with
refernce to No.F.12016/1234-1235/2016/RTI-UIDAI Dated: 10/09/2016
with
reference to UIDAI Hqrs.: w.r.t. case no. 1358 dated 18th August
2016
with
reference to UIDAI Hqrs.: w.r.t. case no. 1356 dated 17.08.2016
with reference to No.5(5)/47/157/2014-E &U-II
Dated: 13/09/2016
Respected Sir,
I sent a RTI on 09.08.2016 & regarding
which I received replies through above reference numbers. I would like to
humbly state that the PIO has with malafide intention provided misleading
information, Incomplete infomation, equivocate information, half-hearted
working as follows:-
(1)
Point 1, 2, 3 of my RTI raised
queries in larger public interest regarding a criminal offence pertaining to
possession of two aadhar cards. Point 17, 18 of RTI pertained to punishment for
officer of UIDAI if he tries to tamper with records or tries to protect someone
possessing a bogus aadhar card. And I attached proofs related to a person These
two queries directly would have maThe PIO = DD (E&U-II)/CPIO vide reference
number No.5(5)/47/234/2014-E
&U-II Dated: 11/09/2016 with malafide intent mentioned 2014 within
this reference number instead of 2016 & chose to remain silent on point 1,
2, 3 tried to protect This reference
number mentions 2016 which is misleading
PRAYER:-
(1)
To pass necessary directions in the
light of above facts & circumstances
(2)
To initiate action against the erring
PIO u/s 20 of RTI Act’2005
Any other reliefs/
order as this Hon’ble FAA deems fit.
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o
Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
RTI on AERO (Election Office) – Misrepresentation of True
Legal Identity punishable u/s 31 of Representation of People Act, 1950
To Dated:-
05/01/2017
Assistant Electoral
Registration Officer
AC-17, Rohini
Mangol
Puri
Delhi-110086
Sub:- Request
for information u/s 6 & 7 of RTI Act
2005
It is requested that following information may kindly be supplied under
RTI Act 2005:-
1.
That within point 15 of reply vide No.F.1/AERO/AC-17/2016/4283
Dated:-31-12-16, the Hon'ble PIO informed that, "any
person who makes a statement or declaration which is false and which he either
knows or believes to be false or does not believe to be true, is punishable u/s
31 of ROP Act, 1950" hence kindly supply me the extract/copy of that
document/ Ordinance/ Regulation/ rules/ policy/ code/ circular/ norms/
directives/ notifications/ guidelines/ standing instructions/ other related
documents which legalizes/legalized any such voter I card issued by your office
in a totally different name to a person who holds an aadhar card with a totally
different name on the date of making such statement or declaration in other
name before your esteemed authority.
2.
Is it a criminal offence for one person to possess two
different identity cards viz., one aadhar card with name Pativrata Devi &
one voter card with name Jhoothi Devi i.e., with two totally different names at
the same time? Kindly supply the information to this point in either a YES/NO
only.
3.
Kindly supply the certified photocopy of all the
complaints against the AERO/AC-17 from 01.12.2015 to till date of this RTI
application.
I am sending a Blank Postal Order no.
16F 384747 of Rs. 10 dated 05/01/2017 is attached herewith.
Kindly fill the PIO details as it is the duty of PIO to provide
reasonable assistance u/s 5 (3) of the RTI act to applicant. The
requested information shall be supplied free of charge in case the same could
not be supplied within 30 days u/s 7(6) of RTI Act 2005. Kindly provide the
information to each point separately. Please do not club the information to the
points even if the information is repeated.
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o Q-7/77, GF,
Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
RTI on RTO (Name Fraud before Driving Licence Authority) –
Identity Fraud
To Dated:-
16/08/2016
Public Information Officer
REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE,
Wazir Pur, North West Delhi
New
Delhi - 110052
Sub:- Request for information u/s 6 & 7
of RTI Act 2005
Respected Sir/Madam,
BACKGROUND:-
It is most humbly & respectfully informed that there is only one person in
entire India by the name “PATIVRATA DEVI”. This is such a unique name. It is
also informed that there is only one person in entire India by the name “JHOOTHI
DEVI” This is also such a unique name. It is respectfully further informed that
interestingly both the above two names are been/ have (had) been / being used
by one person i.e., one person having two completely different named identity
card/s in same/different government authorities of India which is criminal
offence under relevant provisions of IPC &/or CrPC &/or also as per
Representation of the People Act. It is informed that the person named “JHOOTHI
DEVI” changed her name from “JHOOTHI DEVI” to “PATIVRATA DEVI” in the year 2009
by way of filing court affidavit & newspaper publication (which was never
challenged by anyone) & then till 2015 she kept using the name “PATIVRATA
DEVI” (Enclosures 1 to 10 attached for the kind perusal of this Hon’ble PIO).
It is humbly informed that aadhar card number of this person by
the name “PATIVRATA DEVI” is 1234 3456
2349 with address Q-7/77, Sector-30, Rohini whereas
driving licence number of this same person by the
name “JHOOTHI DEVI” is DL-0123456227543 is with
address as AZ-747 Rani Bagh Delhi 110034. It is respectfully
informed that as per law it is mandatory for a person to give her correct name
to the government agencies. This licence when issued on 05/09/2009 the name of
this person was “JHOOTHI DEVI” but the licence when re-issued on 11/09/2015 the
name of this person was “PATIVRATA DEVI” as per the ten enclosures attached
with this RTI hence this clearly proves that PATIVRATA DEVI might have duped
your esteemed authorities/office to get re-issue of licence under a false name
of “JHOOTHI DEVI” which is against the law because as per law a married woman
can not change her name without the divorce & if she wants to change her
name then it has to be done by following at least the same procedure which she
followed to change her name immediately after marriage in 2009.
It is requested that
following information may kindly be supplied under RTI Act 2005:-
35.
Is it a criminal offence for one
person to possess two different identity cards viz., (aadhar card & driving
licence) with two different names at the same time?
36.
Kindly supply the information wrt
punishment provisions as per point 1 above.
37.
If a person possesses two aadhar
cards &/or two driving licence &/or one aadhar card & one driving
licence with different names on each then what is the normal action taken by
your esteemed authority.
38.
Kindly supply the date when this
person named “JHOOTHI DEVI” applied & was reissued a licence in the year
2015.
39.
Kindly supply the certified copies of
all the documents submitted by this person named “JHOOTHI DEVI” in 2015 as per
your records to get the driving licence re-issued.
40.
Kindly supply the certified copy of name
change proof submitted by “JHOOTHI DEVI” to get re-issue of driving
licence as per your records.
41.
Kindly supply the certified copy of name
change proof submitted by “JHOOTHI DEVI” to get re-issue of driving
licence as per your records because the ten enclosures clearly prove that her
name was “PATIVRATA DEVI” from Dec’2009 to year 2015 & as per law there has
to be certain name change proof in respect thereof in your records.
42.
Since possession of two government
identity cards especially driving licence & aadhar card with two different
names by the same person is a criminal offence hence kindly supply the
certified copy of the action taken report by your office due on this
RTI.
43.
Kindly supply the information whether
the aadhar card of “PATIVRATA DEVI” has been linked to her driving licence as
above which has a different name.
44.
Kindly supply the aadhar card number
of “PATIVRATA DEVI” which is linked to her driving licence.
45.
Kindly supply the information whether
the aadhar card of “JHOOTHI DEVI” has been linked to her driving licence.
46.
Kindly supply the aadhar card number
of “JHOOTHI DEVI” which is linked to her voter I Card.
47.
Kindly supply the certified copies,
documents, date of enrolment in your records related to this person named “JHOOTHI
DEVI”
48.
Kindly supply the information whether
the voter card associated with the name “JHOOTHI DEVI” has been found to be
bogus.
49.
Kindly supply the action taken
report by your office based on the findings & revelations clearly
explained through this RTI request.
50.
Kindly supply the certified copies
regarding illegalily to get driving licence prepared by misleading the
government agencies & action as per the rules?
51.
Kindly supply what action your office
takes on finding a bogus driving licence.
52.
Kindly supply the punishment
prescribed under the act for any officer of your department trying to hide the
information wrt a bogus driving licence.
53.
Kindly supply the punishment
prescribed under the act for any officer of your department trying to tamper
with the records wrt a bogus driving licence.
54.
If any driving licence is found to be
bogus then please provide the certified copy of notice &/or calls &/or
written communications sent by your office to this person.
55.
Kindly provide certified copies of
all calls &/or written communications to & from between your office
& this person due to above info.
56.
Kindly provide certified copies of
all notice &/or calls &/or written communications to & from between
your office & this person from date of this RTI to date of reply to this
RTI by your esteemed office.
Enclosures:-
11. Affidavit
of name change from “JHOOTHI DEVI” to “PATIVRATA DEVI” dated 21st
Dec’2009
12. Back
side of above Affidavit
13. Super
Enlarged view of newspaper ad of name from “JHOOTHI DEVI” to “PATIVRATA DEVI”
14. Enlarged
view of above newspaper ad
15. Photocopy
of above newspaper ad
16. Signatures
of “PATIVRATA DEVI” dated 04/01/2015
17. Signatures
of “PATIVRATA DEVI” dated 02/01/2015
18. Signatures
of “PATIVRATA DEVI” dated 07/01/2015
19. Handwriting
of “PATIVRATA DEVI” for which the date is on next enclosure
20. Signatures
of “PATIVRATA DEVI” dated 26/12/2010
I am sending a Blank
Postal Order no. 32F 234456
of Rs. 10 dated 11/04/2016 is
attached herewith. Kindly fill the PIO details as it is the duty
of PIO to provide reasonable assistance u/s 5 (3) of
the RTI act to applicant. The requested information shall be supplied
free of charge in case the same could not be supplied within 30 days u/s 7(6)
of RTI Act 2005. Please do not club the information to the points even if the
information is repeated.
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o
Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
Complaint to RTO vis-à-vis Misrepresentation of True Legal
Identity
COMPLAINT BEFORE THE
HON’BLE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE, WAZIRPUR, NORTH-WEST DELHI, NEW DELHI-110052
FORMAL COMPLAINT WRT MLO
(NWZ-I)/DWARKA/2016/173 Dated: 18/11/2016
MOST RESPECTFULLY
SHOWETH
(1) That wrt to MLO (NWZ-I)/DWARKA/2016/173 Dated:
18/11/2016 via
RTI response contained in the above reference number, some/ most of points were
denied & thereby advised to file a formal complaint & hence my original
RTI therein dated 16/08/2016 with all annexures therein shall be treated as a
formal complaint for necessary action by your esteemed authority.
PRAYER:- (0) Kindly transfer this
complaint to the appropriate authority.
(1)
Kindly take necessary
action in the interest of justice r/w the People’s Representation Act & r/w
Motor Vehicles Act.
(2)
Kindly take necessary
action because possession of two government identity cards by two different
names (if found) is a criminal offence & also playing fraud with government
agencies in a country like India demands appropriate action by your esteemed
authority.
(3)
That I be provided answers
to all the original queries raised by me within the original RTI thereof &
shall not be denied for want of formal complaint as that has been made thru
this representation.
(4)
That I be provided answers
to all the questions raised by me within the original RTI through a single
continuous sheet so that this can act as an evidence in the court of law &
responsibilities & accountability can be fixed with transparency.
Any other relief/orders as
this Hon’ble Authority deems fit.
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o
Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
RTI – RTO = ATR (Action Taken Report) vis-à-vis Identity
Fraud by Wife
To Dated:-
31/12/2016
Public Information Officer
REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE,
Wazir Pur, North West Delhi
New Delhi - 110052
Sub:- Request for information u/s 6 & 7
of RTI Act 2005
Respected Sir/Madam,
On
10.08.2015 I sent a complaint wrt to MLO (NWZ-I)/DWARKA/2016/173 Dated: 18/11/2016 to Hon’ble RTO/Dwarka/NWD/Delhi-75
(Annexed for your kind perusal)
It is requested that following information
may kindly be supplied under RTI Act 2005:-
57.
Kindly provide certified copies of
action taken report based on this complaint.
58.
Kindly provide certified copies of
answers to those questions of concerned RTI which were not provided by Hon’ble PIO vide MLO
(NWZ-I)/DWARKA/2016/173 Dated: 18/11/2016 due to lack of a formal complaint
whereas now there is already a formal complaint as advised so those answers can
be provided now.
59.
Kindly supply certified copy of
communications, marking sheets, noting sheets wrt the above noted complaint
dated 19/11/2016 (annexed for perusal).
I am sending a Blank
Postal Order no. 32F 836746
of Rs. 10 dated 19/11/2016 is
attached herewith. Kindly fill the PIO details as it is the duty
of PIO to provide reasonable assistance u/s 5 (3) of
the RTI act to applicant. The requested information shall be supplied
free of charge in case the same could not be supplied within 30 days u/s 7(6)
of RTI Act 2005. Kindly provide the information to each point separately. Please
do not club the information to the points even if the information is repeated.
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o
Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
FAA – RTO è PIO didn’t honored 6(3) of RTI Act & FAA address NOT
communicated to RTI Applicant & Allows Tampering of Records & working
contrary to Motor Vehicles Act with malafide intention
To Dated 17/07/2016
First Appellate
Authority,
CHIEF GENERAL
MANAGER,
DTC HQ, I.P.ESTATE,
New Delhi-110002
Sub:- with
reference to MLO (NWZ-I)/DWARKA/2016/176 Dated: 16/07/2016
Respected Sir,
In reference to RTI response by PIO to above
REFERENCE NUMBER I would like to humbly state that the PIO has provided highly
misleading answers as follows:-
(1)
In point no.1, 2 & 8 of my RTI he
simply stated that the matter relates to prosecution department but he did not
honored the section 6(3) of RTI Act’2005 to transfer the RTI.
(2)
Name of First Appellate Authority was
not provided to me intentionally which proves his malafide intention to block
me to approach the FAA.
(3)
In point no.15,16,17,20,22 he
insisted to lodge a formal complaint even after I clearly attached proofs (ten
enclosures) which very well proved the identity fraud (name fraud) played on
your esteemed authority which he could have very easily verified by issuing
notices to concerned party & get their say under the provisions of the RTI
Rules’2005 which he did not & hence this appeal.
(4)
In point no.18 he mentioned that in
case subsequently information founds concealed or misrepresented then action
will be initiated against that person under MV Act’1988. At this point he seems
to be making fun of the entire system because on one hand I have presented all
the proofs which clearly prove the name fraud done to your esteemed authority
by way of concealment & misrepresentation & on the other hand he wishes
to take action only after a formal complaint is lodged. This also brings shame
to our nation India where some officer holding such high position try to evade
from their responsibility.
(5)
In point 16 he mentions records are
weeded out & he wanted to make the RTI applicant believe that in less than
two years time record is weeded out by such an esteemed authority thereby
clearly putting a question mark on the record retention period.
(6)
In this regard it is iterated that,
As per MV Act’1988 r/w 19. Power of licensing authority to disqualify from holding
a driving licence or revoke such licence (e) has obtained any driving licence
or a licence to drive a particular class or description of motor vehicle by
fraud or misrepresentation.
PRAYER:-
(1)
To pass necessary directions in the
light of above facts & circumstances
(2)
To initiate action against the erring
PIO u/s 20 of RTI Act’2005
Any other reliefs/
order as this Hon’ble FAA deems fit.
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
RTI on CALL TO MY MOBILE or Threatening/ Intimidation of RTI
Applicant
To Dated:-
27/11/2016
Public Information Officer
DTC Headquarters,
I.P.Estate
New Delhi - 110002
Sub:- Request for information u/s 6 & 7
of RTI Act 2005
Respected Sir/Madam,
CONFIDENTIAL:-
This RTI contains my confidential number 9873540498. Kindly do NOT call me on
this number. I humbly request your esteemed & Hon’ble authority to NEITHER
let this mobile number 9873540498 leaked from your official records to anyone
NOR let this confidential RTI leaked to anyone without my written consent due
to my right to life & liberty and also due to other personal reasons.
BACKGROUND:-
It is respectfully submitted that I never mention my mobile number 9873540498
in any of my RTI’s, Complaints or other communications but still on 26/11/2016
at about 3:27pm I received a call from +9111233707x7 & that person on the
other side forced me to reveal my identity which could be an attempt to
pressurize me to withdraw my RTI’s & complaints to public authorities but I
disconnected this phone sensing these threats which are common to RTI Activists
all over India. Thereafter I searched google & found this number to be
listed for DTC Headquarters EPABX & was shocked to learn that someone
threatened me from a high profile number.
It is requested that following information
may kindly be supplied under RTI Act 2005 wrt the above stated facts &
circumstances:-
1.
Kindly supply the name of the person
who called me.
2.
Kindly supply the name of the
person/s who gave you my number.
3.
Kindly supply the purpose of this
call.
4.
Kindly supply the talks that were
done through this phone call.
5.
Kindly supply the certified copy from
the diary entry & other entries made in the register with respect to the
above call?
6.
Kindly supply the certified copy
related to action taken report with respect to the purpose for which this call
was made?
7.
Kindly supply the certified copy
related to action taken report for making the call again if the call's/caller’s
purpose was not achieved in the first call?
8.
Kindly supply the action taken report
on the informer who gave you my number.
I am sending a Blank
Postal Order no. 32F 123456
of Rs. 10 dated 21/11/2016 is
attached herewith. Kindly fill the PIO details as it is the duty
of PIO to provide reasonable assistance u/s 5 (3) of
the RTI act to applicant. The requested information shall be supplied
free of charge in case the same could not be supplied within 30 days u/s 7(6)
of RTI Act 2005. Please do not club the information to the points even if the
information is repeated.
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
TEP time limit to complete investigation under the statute
vis-à-vis Tax Evasion Petition
To Dated:- 09/11/2016
Public Information
Officer
CPIO & Income
Tax Officer,
Ward-39(2), Room No.
807, 8th Floor,
E2-Block, Dr. S.P.
Mukherjee Bhawan,
Civic Centre, New
Delhi - 110002
Sub:- Request
for information u/s 6 & 7 of the RTI Act’2005
Respected Sir,
I sent a Tax Evasion
Petition on 14/07/2014 to your esteemed authority regarding Tax Evasion by Sh.
(Late) Dr. Wife’s Father FIL Ji , Smt. Wife’s Mother MIL Ji, Mrs. JHOOTHI DEVI
Ji, Ms. Wife’s Sister SIL Ji, all residents of AZ-747, Rani Bagh, New
Delhi-110034
(1)
Kindly supply the information i.e.,
the expected time period for the completion of the enquiry by your esteemed
authority.
(2)
Kindly supply the information i.e.,
the expected time period for the completion of the enquiry prescribed under the
law.
(3)
Kindly supply the information i.e.,
the expected time period for the completion of the investigation by your
esteemed authority.
(4)
Kindly supply the information i.e.,
the expected time period for the completion of the investigation prescribed
under the law.
(5)
I request your esteemed authority to
kindly provide me information whether the information provided by me has been
found to be false or true
CITATION:- As per File
No.CIC/RM/A/2013/000635 it was held by CIC that, “The complainant has a right to know whether the information
provided by him has been found to be false or true”. (Annexed
for the kind perusal of this Hon’ble PIO)
I request you to
provide the information at the earliest. If not I'll be compelled to approach
the Chief Information Commissioner &/ or Delhi High Court &/ or
Consumer Redressal Forum &/ or http://www.pgportal.gov.in for any attempt
to restrict the flow of information guaranteed vide Constitution of India vide
RTI Act’2005.
I am sending a Blank
Postal Order no. 32F 192345
of Rs. 10 dated 12/10/2016 is
attached herewith. Kindly fill the PIO details as it is the duty
of PIO to provide reasonable assistance u/s 5 (3) of
the RTI act to applicant. The requested information shall be supplied
free of charge in case the same could not be supplied within 30 days u/s 7(6)
of RTI Act 2005. Please do not club the information to the points even if the
information is repeated.
Enclosed:- File
No.CIC/RM/A/2013/000635
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
RTI – True or False (Yes or No only) – Tax Evasion Petition
(& Postal Order Validity is 2 years)
To Dated:- 09/09/2016
Public Information
Officer
O/o the Hon’ble
INCOME TAX OFFICER,
Ward-23(1), Room No.
807, 8th Floor,
E2-Block, Dr. S.P.
Mukherjee Civic Centre,
JLN Marg, Minto
Road, New Delhi - 110002
Sub:- Request
for information u/s 6 & 7 of the RTI Act’2005
Respected Sir,
I sent a Tax Evasion
Petition on 14/07/2014 to your esteemed authority regarding Tax Evasion by Sh.
(Late) Dr. Wife’s Father FIL Ji , Smt. Wife’s Mother MIL Ji, Mrs. JHOOTHI DEVI
Ji, Ms. Wife’s Sister SIL Ji, all residents of AZ-747, Rani Bagh, New
Delhi-110034
(6)
Kindly supply the information i.e.,
the expected time period for the completion of the enquiry by your esteemed
authority.
(7)
Kindly supply the information i.e.,
the expected time period for the completion of the enquiry prescribed under the
law.
(8)
Kindly supply the information i.e.,
the expected time period for the completion of the investigation by your
esteemed authority.
(9)
Kindly supply the information i.e.,
the expected time period for the completion of the investigation prescribed
under the law.
(10)I request your
esteemed authority to kindly provide me information whether the information
provided by me has been found to be false or true
CITATION:- As per File
No.CIC/RM/A/2013/000635 it was held by CIC that, “The complainant has a right to know whether the information
provided by him has been found to be false or true”. (Annexed
for the kind perusal of this Hon’ble PIO)
Indian
Postal Order validity is 2 years:- As per the Circular of Department of
Posts encashment of postal orders is NOW allowed for two years. (Annexed for
Perusal)
I am sending a Blank
Postal Order no. 32F 123456
of Rs. 10 dated 08/09/2016 is
attached herewith. Kindly fill the PIO details as it is the duty
of PIO to provide reasonable assistance u/s 5 (3) of
the RTI act to applicant. The requested information shall be supplied
free of charge in case the same could not be supplied within 30 days u/s 7(6)
of RTI Act 2005. Please do not club the information to the points even if the
information is repeated.
Enclosed:- (1) File
No.CIC/RM/A/2013/000635
(2) Encashment
of Indian Postal Orders – Circular of Department of Posts
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
TEP on Wife – No Reply by PIO Income Tax Authority (First
Appeal against Income Tax Authority)
To Dated:- 10/05/2017
First Appellate
Authority
O/o the Hon’ble
Joint Commissioner of Income Tax,
Range 23, Room No.
806, 8th Floor, E2-Block,
Pratyaksh Kar
Bhawan, Dr. S.P. Mukherjee Civic Centre,
JLN Marg, Minto
Road, New Delhi - 110002
Sub:- First
Appeal u/s 19(1) of RTI Act 2005 due to NO REPLY RECEIVED from Hon’ble Public
Information Officer mentioned below.
Respected Sir,
(1)
That I have NOT received reply to my
RTI request dated 15/08/2016 sent to Office of the Hon’ble INCOME TAX OFFICER,
Ward-23(1), Room No. 807, 8th Floor, E2-Block, Dr. S.P. Mukherjee Civic Centre,
JLN Marg, Minto Road, New Delhi - 110002 vide RD447607664IN (Annexed RTI & Postal
Proof for your kind perusal).
(2)
That this concerned PIO with malafide
intention has not provided information which is held by their office pertaining
to this RTI request. Hence, this Hon'ble PIO has denied/ evaded to provide the information
held with their esteemed office/ authority.
PRAYER:
(3)
To pass necessary directions in the
light of above facts & circumstances
(4)
The PIO be directed to immediately
release this information which he has denied or evaded vis-à-vis no reply at
all within the time prescribed under the RTI Act, 2005.
(5)
To initiate action against the erring
PIO u/s 20 of RTI Act’2005
(6)
The further information shall be
provided free of cost i.e., the applicant/ undersigned be exempted in view of
section 7(6) of RTI Act 2005 from payment of any further fee payable by me for
supplying of requested information on account of default on the part of PIO to
supply information within prescribed time.
(7)
Any other reliefs/ order as this
Hon’ble FAA deems fit.
Enclosed:- (1) My RTI dated 15/08/2016
(2) Postal Proof vide RD162535342IN
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
First Appeal – True/ False (PIO lies after denial of
information), Equivocate Response by Public Information Officer &
malafidely helping prospective evaders of tax
To Dated:- 23/01/2017
First Appellate
Authority
O/o the Hon’ble
Joint Commissioner of Income Tax,
Range 23, Room No.
806, 8th Floor, E2-Block,
Pratyaksh Kar
Bhawan, Dr. S.P. Mukherjee Civic Centre,
JLN Marg, Minto
Road, New Delhi - 110002
Sub:- First
Appeal u/s 19(1) of RTI Act 2005 due to FALSE & EVASIVE REPLY BY THE
HON’BLE PIO CONCERNED wrt reference number
F.No.ITO/WARD-23(1)/RTI/2017/0023 Dated:
21/01/2017.
Respected Sir,
(1)
That this concerned PIO with malafide
intention is not providing me the information under right to information act,
2005 & is thereby trying to find one excuse or another as follows:-
A.
I filed the RTI with same content (on
20/12/2016) as the concerned RTI to which the above reference number relates
but this same Hon’ble PIO Sh. T.R. S.N. Dhingra Ji vide F.No.ITO/WARD-23(1)/RTI/2017/021 Dated: 21/01/2017 rejected my RTI
stating that my postal order no. 32F 123456 dt. 21.09.2015 is expired as the
date of eligibility is 90 days from the date of issue.
B.
Then I filed the concerned RTI to
which the above reference number relates on 15.08.2016 & used the postal
order no. 32F 123432 dt. 21.09.2015 but the Hon’ble PIO Sh. T.R. S.N. Dhingra
Ji did not replied to my RTI request.
C.
Then I filed First Appeal on date 15/12/2016
but surprisingly the same Hon’ble PIO Sh. T.R. S.N. Dhingra Ji vide F.No.ITO/WARD-23(1)/RTI/2016-17/1920 Dated: 31/12/2016
replied me falsely & evasively as follows:-
(i)
That the Hon’ble PIO Sh. T.R. S.N.
Dhingra Ji falsely stated that he had already sent me the reply on 09/10/2016
which is a blatant lie. It is humbly submitted before this Hon’ble FAA that, had
this been sent to me then there must be some postal proof document in
support as objective evidence which this Hon’ble FAA has the authority to
enquire/ investigate under the RTI Act, 2005 & therefore I request the same
before this Hon’ble FAA.
(ii)
He gave me an equivocate answer to
point number 1 to 4. It is respectfully submitted that within my RTI concerned
I had requested that “Please do not club the information to the points
even if the information is repeated.” But still the Hon’ble PIO Sh.
T.R. S.N. Dhingra Ji vide F.No.ITO/WARD-23(1)/RTI/2016/1920 Dated: 31/12/2016 clubbed the
information & thereby provided me an equivocate response with malafide
intention to evade the reply to some of the points.
(iii)
Via point no. 2 of my RTI concerned I
had requested, “Kindly supply the information i.e., the expected time
period for the completion of the enquiry prescribed under the law.” but the Hon’ble PIO Sh. T.R. S.N. Dhingra Ji
gave evasive reply by stating that “Nil as no record is available with
us”. I would thereby most humbly & respectfully request this
Hon’ble FAA to check the records & confirm whether in reality as per
law there is no expected time period for completion of enquiry
vis-à-vis tax evasion petition filed before Hon’ble Income Tax Department &
does that also mean that the Hon’ble Income Tax Department (concerned
authority) is empowered to hold indefinitely a tax evasion petition filed
before it without putting on record whether such tax evasion petition filed
before it was false or true.
(iv)
Via point no. 4 of my RTI concerned I
had requested, “Kindly supply the information i.e., the expected time
period for the completion of the investigation prescribed under the law.” but the Hon’ble PIO Sh. T.R. S.N. Dhingra Ji
gave evasive reply by stating that “Nil as no record is available with
us”. I would thereby most humbly & respectfully request this
Hon’ble FAA to check the records & confirm whether in reality as per
law there is no expected time period for completion of investigation
vis-à-vis tax evasion petition filed before Hon’ble Income Tax Department &
does that also mean that the Hon’ble Income Tax Department (concerned
authority) is empowered to hold indefinitely a tax evasion petition filed
before it without putting on record whether such tax evasion petition filed
before it was false or true.
(v)
Via point no. 5 of my RTI concerned I
had requested, “I request your esteemed authority to kindly provide me
information whether the information provided by me has been found to be false
or true” but the
Hon’ble PIO Sh. T.R. S.N. Dhingra Ji gave evasive reply by stating that they do
not have the records available for one of those persons against whom tax
evasion petition had been filed. Thereby firstly he remained silent about all
other persons against whom this tax evasion petition was filed & Secondly
he did not honored the section 6 & 7 of the RTI Act, 2005 to transfer those
parts which could have been related to other PIO’s.
(vi)
It is NOT out of place to mention
here that, tax evasion petitions/ complaints are usually filed about the tax
evaded by some individual or by some group of individuals and this involves
money directly and if Income Tax Department (concerned authority) is empowered
enough to hold such petitions indefinitely without coming to a logical conclusion
within a preset time whether information provided through such petition was false
or true then there is a dire need to amend the Income Tax Act 1961
& provision contained therein. And since this involves possibility of tax
evaded by some individual / group of individuals & such evasion in itself
is in cash (liquid of liquid assets) hence non providing of information under
the RTI Act, 2005 with malafide intent is also a serious concern for the
society we live in.
(vii)
Further, the date when this tax evasion
petition was filed is 14/07/2014 whereas the date mentioned by the Hon’ble PIO
Sh. T.R. S.N. Dhingra Ji vide F.No.ITO/WARD-23(1)/RTI/2016/1920 Dated: 31/12/2016 is 29/11/2015
& it is respectfully submitted that on this date as mentioned by PIO I
never filed any tax evasion petition.
PRAYER:
(1)
To pass necessary directions in the
light of above facts & circumstances
(2)
The PIO be directed to immediately
release this information which he has denied or evaded vis-à-vis no reply at
all within the time prescribed under the RTI Act, 2005.
(3)
To initiate action against the erring
PIO u/s 20 of RTI Act’2005
(4)
The further information shall be
provided free of cost i.e., the applicant/ undersigned be exempted in view of
section 7(6) of RTI Act 2005 from payment of any further fee payable by me for
supplying of requested information on account of default on the part of PIO to
supply information within prescribed time.
Any other reliefs/
order as this Hon’ble FAA deems fit.
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
RTI – True or False only (TEP) & I. T. Act, 1961
To Dated:- 27/12/2016
Public Information
Officer
O/o the Hon’ble
INCOME TAX OFFICER,
Ward-23(1), Room No.
807, 8th Floor,
E2-Block, Dr. S.P.
Mukherjee Civic Centre,
JLN Marg, Minto
Road, New Delhi - 110002
Sub:- Request
for information u/s 6 & 7 of the RTI Act’2005
Respected Sir,
(1)
Kindly supply the information i.e.,
the expected time period for the completion of enquiry in ANY tax
evasion petition prescribed under the law.
NOTE:- In above
point I am NOT asking about my RTI’s or Petitions, instead, I am asking what
the law says with respect to maximum time period within which enquiry with
respect to any tax evasion petition need to be completed.
(2)
Kindly supply the information i.e.,
the expected time period for the completion of investigation in ANY
tax evasion petition prescribed under the law.
NOTE:- In above
point I am NOT asking about my RTI’s or Petitions, instead, I am asking what
the law says with respect to maximum time period within which investigation
with respect to any tax evasion petition need to be completed.
(3)
I sent a Tax Evasion Petition on 14/07/2014
to your esteemed authority regarding Tax Evasion by Sh. (Late) Dr. Wife’s
Father FIL Ji , Smt. Wife’s Mother MIL Ji, Mrs. JHOOTHI DEVI Ji, Ms. Wife’s
Sister SIL Ji, all residents of AZ-747, Rani Bagh, New Delhi-110034
Kindly provide me information under the RTI Act, 2005 whether
the information provided by me on 23/05/2014 has been found to be false
or true
NOTE:- On 14/07/2014
I provided information for all those persons as mentioned above so I request
that I be provided the reply to this query accordingly u/s 6 & 7 of the RTI
Act, 2005.
CITATION:- As per File
No.CIC/RM/A/2013/000635 it was held by CIC that, “The complainant has a right to know whether the information
provided by him has been found to be false or true”. (Annexed
for the kind perusal of this Hon’ble PIO)
I am sending a Blank
Postal Order no. 16F 123432 of
Rs. 10 dated 30/10/2016 is
attached herewith. Kindly fill the PIO details as it is the duty
of PIO to provide reasonable assistance u/s 5 (3) of
the RTI act to applicant. The requested information shall be supplied
free of charge in case the same could not be supplied within 30 days u/s 7(6)
of RTI Act 2005. Please do not club the information to the points even if the
information is repeated.
Enclosed:- (1) File
No.CIC/RM/A/2013/000635
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
Complaint u/s 18(1)(a) to Central Information Commission
against Public Information Officer for Refusal to Accept the RTI Application
To Dated 11/09/2016
Central Information
Commission,
Room No, 326, 2nd
Floor,
August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji
Cama Place,
New Delhi-110066
Sub:- Complaint
u/s 18(1)(a) of RTI Act 2005 - REFUSAL TO ACCEPT THE RTI APPLICATION BY THE PIO
Respected Sir,
(2)
That I made a RTI request dated 17/07/2016
which was posted on 18/07/2016 and addressed to Hon’ble PIO/AAI vide RD928374645IN.
(3)
That the Hon’ble PIO refused to
accept the RTI (annexed latest delivery status, copy of both sides of returned
envelope).
(4)
That this concerned PIO with malafide
intention has refused to accept the RTI.
PRAYER:
(5)
To pass necessary directions in the
light of above facts & circumstances
(6)
To Conduct the enquiry in the matter
of
(a)
not accepting RTI request,
(b)
malafidely returning the postal
envelop containing RTI request after a considerable period of 40 days i.e.
refusing to accept the RTI Request
(7)
To impose penalty of Rs. 25,000 on PIO under
the RTI Act’2005
Annexed:- (1)
Latest Delivery Status
(2)
Copy of both sides of Returned Envelope
(3) Copy of RTI which was
returned
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
FAA – Partly True, Fully True or False vis-à-vis TEP
To Dated:- 16/11/2016
First Appellate
Authority
O/o the Hon’ble
Joint Commissioner of Income Tax,
Range 23, Room No.
806, 8th Floor, E2-Block,
Pratyaksh Kar
Bhawan, Dr. S.P. Mukherjee Civic Centre,
JLN Marg, Minto
Road, New Delhi - 110002
Sub:- First
Appeal u/s 19(1) of RTI Act 2005 wrt reference number F.No.ITO/WARD-23(1)/RTI/2016/1234
Dated: 15/11/2016.
Respected Sir,
(1)
That as per above reference number I
have been informed that, “The Tax evasion petition filed by you dt. 14.7.2014
is under progress so we are not able to say that whether information provided
by you is false or true”.
(2)
That I request this Hon’ble FAA to
kindly peruse that Tax evasion petition dt. 14.7.2014 which is under progress
as per this Hon’ble PIO based on which this Hon’ble PIO Sh. T.R. S.N. DHINGRA
JI replied vide F.No.ITO/WARD-23(1)/RTI/2016/1234 Dated: 15/11/2016 that “The Tax
evasion petition filed by you dt. 14.7.2014 is under progress so we are not
able to say that whether information provided by you is false or true”
(3)
That this information concerned is of
immense relevance, to defend myself in criminal proceedings.
(4)
That the appellant request this
Hon’ble FAA to kindly refer below Citations/ Judgments by Hon’ble CIC (Annexed
for your kind perusal) as follows., CIC/LS/A/2009/001179 18.02.2010
, it was held that, “It is to be noted that investigation into a TEP
cannot be allowed to go on ad-infinitum and that it should be concluded in a
reasonable time frame where after the broad outcome thereof needs to be
communicated to the appellant i.e. whether the allegations made in the TEP are
fully true, partially true or untrue.” (Annexed for your kind perusal) CIC/LS/A/2009/000386 19.1.2010
it was held that, “The CPIO, therefore, is directed to disclose the
following information to the appellant :- (i) Whether or not Shri Baljinder
Singh has filed Income Tax Returns, for the years 2005-06, 2006-07 &
2007-08. No details, however, need to be supplied. (ii) If, it is true that the
appellant had filed a tax evasion petition in respect of Shri Baljinder Singh,
and if the investigation has been completed, the broad outcome thereof, (that
is, whether it has been found to be fully true or partially true or false)
should be disclosed to the appellant.” (Annexed
for your kind perusal) File No.CIC/LS/A/2009/001113
Appellant : Shri Chetan Anand Parashar Date of Decision : 19.2.2010 CIC held as
follows :- “7. In view of the above discussion, the decisions of CPIO and
AA in regard to non disclosure of ITRs are upheld. Even so, the CPIO is
directed to intimate the outcome of TEP to the appellant in 03 months time.”
(Annexed for your kind perusal) And In another decision dated 18.02.2010
in Virag R Dhulia Vs IT Department, Kolkatta File No.CIC/LS/A/2009/001179,
it was held as follows : “……………(6)In view of the above, Income Tax
Office, Ward No.31(3), 20, BC Middleton Row, Kolkatta – 700017 is hereby
directed to complete the investigation in next three months time and intimate
the broad outcome thereof, as indicated herein above, to the appellant in three
months time.” (Annexed for your
kind perusal)
PRAYER:
(8)
To pass necessary directions in the
light of above facts & circumstances
(9)
The PIO / CPIO be directed to
intimate the outcome of TEP to the appellant in 03 months time/ next three
months time.
(10)The
PIO / CPIO be directed to intimate the outcome of TEP to the appellant as
follows viz., fully true or partially true or false.
(11)To
initiate action against the erring PIO u/s 20 of RTI Act’2005
(12)The
further information shall be provided free of cost i.e., the applicant/
undersigned be exempted in view of section 7(6) of RTI Act 2005 from payment of
any further fee payable by me for supplying of requested information on account
of default on the part of PIO to supply information within prescribed time.
(13)
Any other reliefs/ order as this
Hon’ble FAA deems fit.
Enclosed:- (1)
File No. CIC/LS/A/2009/001179
(2) File No. CIC/LS/A/2009/000386
(3) File No. CIC/LS/A/2009/001113
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
RTI on the basis of PIO’s previous RTI reply on TEP+RTI
To Dated:- 25/02/2017
Public Information
Officer
O/o the CPIO &
INCOME TAX OFFICER,
Ward-39(2), Room No.
807, 8th Floor,
E2-Block, Dr. S.P.
Mukherjee Civic Centre,
JLN Marg, Minto
Road, New Delhi - 110002
Sub:- Request
for information u/s 6 & 7 of the RTI Act’2005 wrt reference number F.No.ITO/WARD-39(1)/RTI/2016/1264 Dated: 18/12/2016
Respected Sir,
Your esteemed authority
vide reference number F.No.ITO/WARD-39(1)/RTI/2016/1264 Dated: 18/12/2016 informed me that, “The
Tax evasion petition filed by you dt. 23.5.2014 is under progress so we are not
able to say that whether information provided by you is false or true”
Since, it is almost two years from the date 14.7.2014 mentioned above, hence, I
would like to draw your kind attention to the File
No.CIC/LS/A/2009/001179 where the ITO was directed to complete the
investigation in next three months time and intimate the broad outcome thereof
to the appellant in three months time. I therefore humbly & respectfully request
to provide me the same information in three months time & seeking other
suitable reliefs/ directions as this Hon’ble PIO deems fit in the interest of
justice. In this regard, it is submitted that, this information is of immense
relevance, to defend myself in criminal proceedings.
CITATION:-
File
No.CIC/LS/A/2009/001179, it was held as follows : “……………(6)In view of the
above, Income Tax Office, Ward No.31(3), 20, BC Middleton Row, Kolkatta –
700017 is hereby directed to complete the investigation in next three months
time and intimate the broad outcome thereof, as indicated herein above, to the
appellant in three months time.”
(Annexed for your kind perusal)
I am sending a Blank Postal Order no.
16F 128374 of Rs. 10 dated 09/12/2016 is attached herewith.
Kindly fill the PIO details as it is the duty of PIO to provide
reasonable assistance u/s 5 (3) of the RTI act to applicant. The
requested information shall be supplied free of charge in case the same could
not be supplied within 30 days u/s 7(6) of RTI Act 2005. Kindly provide the
information to each point separately. Please do not club the information to the
points even if the information is repeated.
Enclosed:- (1) File
No. CIC/LS/A/2009/001179
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
RTI – Passport of Wife under False Name (Misrepresentation of
True Legal Identity)
To Dated:-
12/12/2016
Public Information
Officer
RTI Section, CPV Division,
Ministry of External Affairs, Room No.29,
Patiala House, Tilak Marg,
New Delhi-110001
Sub:- Request for information u/s 6 & 7
of RTI Act 2005
Respected Sir/Madam,
BACKGROUND:-
It is most humbly & respectfully informed that there is only one person in
entire India by the name “PATIVRATA DEVI”. This is such a unique name. It is
also informed that there is only one person in entire India by the name “JHOOTHI
DEVI” This is also such a unique name. It is respectfully further informed that
interestingly both the above two names are been/ have (had) been / being used
by one person i.e., one person having two completely different named identity
card/s in same/different government authorities of India which is criminal
offence under relevant provisions of IPC &/or CrPC &/or also as per
Representation of the People Act. It is informed that the person named “JHOOTHI
DEVI” changed her name from “JHOOTHI DEVI” to “PATIVRATA DEVI” in the year 2009
by way of filing court affidavit & newspaper publication (which was never
challenged by anyone) & then till 2015 she kept using the name “PATIVRATA
DEVI” (Enclosures 1 to 10 attached for the kind perusal of this Hon’ble PIO).
It is humbly informed that aadhar card number of this person by
the name “PATIVRATA DEVI” is 1234 2345
6543 with address Q-7/77, Sector-30, Rohini whereas
this same person possesses a passport by the name “JHOOTHI
DEVI” with address as AZ-747 Rani Bagh Delhi 110034. It
is respectfully informed that as per law it is mandatory for a person to give
her correct name to the government agencies. This passport when issued the name
of this person was “JHOOTHI DEVI” but she changed her name to “JHOOTHI DEVI” as
per the ten enclosures attached with this RTI which clearly proves that “PATIVRATA
DEVI” might be trying to dupe your esteemed authorities/office to mis-use this
passport which she is carrying under a false name of “JHOOTHI DEVI” which is
against the law because as per law a married woman can not change her name
without the divorce & if she wants to change her name then it has to be
done by following at least the same procedure which she followed to change her
name immediately after marriage in 2009 (as per the enclosed ten enclosures). It
is requested that following information may kindly be supplied under RTI Act
2005:-
1.
Is it a criminal offence for one
person to possess two different identity cards viz., (aadhar card &
passport) with two different names at the same time?
2.
Kindly supply the information wrt
punishment provisions as per point 1 above.
3.
If a person possesses two aadhar
cards &/or two passport &/or one aadhar card & one passport with
different names on each then what is the normal action taken by your esteemed
authority.
4.
Kindly supply the date when this
person named “JHOOTHI DEVI” applied also the date when she was issued /
reissued a passport.
5.
Kindly supply the certified copies of
all the documents submitted by this person named “JHOOTHI DEVI” as per your
records to get the passport her issued/ re-issued.
6.
Kindly supply the certified copy of name
change proof submitted by “JHOOTHI DEVI” to get issue/ re-issue of
passport as per your records.
7.
Kindly supply the certified copy of name
change proof submitted by “JHOOTHI DEVI” to get her passport issued/
re-issued to her as per your records because the ten enclosures clearly prove
that her name was “PATIVRATA DEVI” from Dec’2009 to year 2015 & as per law
there has to be certain name change proof in respect thereof in your
records.
8.
Since possession of two government
identity cards especially passport & aadhar card with two different names
by the same person is a criminal offence hence kindly supply the certified copy
of the action taken report by your office due on this RTI.
9.
Kindly supply the information whether
the aadhar card of “PATIVRATA DEVI” has been linked to her passport which has a
different name “JHOOTHI DEVI” on it.
10.
Kindly supply the aadhar card number
of “PATIVRATA DEVI” which is linked to her passport.
11.
Kindly supply the information whether
the aadhar card of “JHOOTHI DEVI” has been linked to her passport.
12.
Kindly supply the aadhar card number
of “JHOOTHI DEVI” which is linked to her passport.
13.
Kindly supply the certified copies,
documents, date of enrolment in your records related to this person named “JHOOTHI
DEVI”
14.
Kindly supply the information whether
the passport associated with the name “JHOOTHI DEVI” has been found to be
bogus.
15.
Kindly supply the action taken
report by your office based on the findings & revelations clearly
explained through this RTI request.
16.
Kindly supply the certified copies
regarding illegalily to get passport issued/ re-issued & non-updation by
misleading the government agencies & action as per the rules?
17.
Kindly supply what action your office
takes on finding a bogus passport.
18.
Kindly supply certified copy, date of
approval & names of all the countries for which visa has been issued to
this person by the false name of “JHOOTHI DEVI”
19.
Kindly supply the punishment
prescribed under the act for any officer of your department trying to hide the
information wrt a bogus passport.
20.
Kindly supply the punishment
prescribed under the act for any officer of your department trying to tamper
with the records wrt a bogus passport.
21.
If any passport is found to be bogus
then please provide the certified copy of notice &/or calls &/or
written communications sent by your office to this person.
22.
Kindly provide certified copies of
all calls &/or written communications to & from between your office
& this person due to above info.
23.
Kindly provide certified copies of
all notice &/or calls &/or written communications to & from between
your office & this person from date of this RTI to date of reply to this
RTI by your esteemed office.
Enclosures:-
1.
Affidavit of name change from “JHOOTHI
DEVI” to “PATIVRATA DEVI” dated 31st Dec’2009
2.
Back side of above Affidavit
3.
Super Enlarged view of newspaper ad
of name from “JHOOTHI DEVI” to “PATIVRATA DEVI”
4.
Enlarged view of above newspaper ad
5.
Photocopy of above newspaper ad
6.
Signatures of “PATIVRATA DEVI” dated
04/01/2015
7.
Signatures of “PATIVRATA DEVI” dated
02/01/2015
8.
Signatures of “PATIVRATA DEVI” dated
07/01/2015
9.
Handwriting of “PATIVRATA DEVI” for
which the date is on next enclosure
10. Signatures
of “PATIVRATA DEVI” dated 26/12/2010
I am sending a Blank
Postal Order no. 32F 192837
of Rs. 10 dated 12/12/2016 is
attached herewith. Kindly fill the PIO details as it is the duty
of PIO to provide reasonable assistance u/s 5 (3) of
the RTI act to applicant. The requested information shall be supplied
free of charge in case the same could not be supplied within 30 days u/s 7(6)
of RTI Act 2005. Please do not club the information to the points even if the
information is repeated.
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
RTI on CPV (Passport of Wife) – Yes or No only
To Dated:-
04/11/2016
Public Information
Officer
Ministry of External Affairs, Regional
Passport Office,
Hudco Trikoot-III, Bhikaji Cama Place,
R.K. Puram, New Delhi-110066
Sub:- Request for information u/s 6 & 7
of RTI Act 2005
Respected Sir/Madam,
Kindly supply the information whether this
person named below has a passport or not. It is respectfully & humbly
informed that this disclosure does not tantamount to invasion of privacy
because information is required in just a YES or NO i.e., whether this person
has been issued a passport or not.
24.
Kindly supply the information whether
the person named JHOOTHI DEVI R/o AZ-747, Rani Bagh, New Delhi – 110034 holds a
passport or not.
25.
Kindly supply the passport number,
date of issue of the holder JHOOTHI DEVI R/o AZ-747, Rani Bagh, New Delhi -
110034.
I am sending a Blank
Postal Order no. 32F 819236
of Rs. 10 dated 02/11/2016 is
attached herewith. Kindly fill the PIO details as it is the duty
of PIO to provide reasonable assistance u/s 5 (3) of
the RTI act to applicant. The requested information shall be supplied
free of charge in case the same could not be supplied within 30 days u/s 7(6)
of RTI Act 2005. Please do not club the information to the points even if the
information is repeated.
Enclosures:-
Annexure 1:- Page 13
para 2 (highlighted) where this person claims that she has no passport
Annexure 2 to 15:-
Certified Copy from Court (Larger Public Interest)
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
Larger Public Interest versus Unwarranted invasion of Privacy
i.e., Exemption under u/s section 8(1)(j) of RTI Act, 2005
LARGER PUBLIC INTEREST VERSUS UNWARRANTED
INVASION OF PRIVACY i.e., EXEMPTION UNDER 8(1)(J) OF RTI ACT 2005
If a person lies in court on sworn affidavit
then it is in the larger public interest to disclose the lies and if the public
authority chooses to protect such lies then the public authority is said to be
in connivance with the person who has lied on sworn affidavit in an India
court. Provided further that, the public authority shall not disclose such
information to a third party if the PIO/ Public authority feels that the
information provided by the RTI applicant is fabricated or for this purpose the
public authority shall duly send a communication to the person whose
information is sought & ask for a show cause notice as to whether the
documents attached by the RTI applicant are genuine or not and why his/her
information shall not be disclosed in the larger public interest as lying in
court on sworn affidavit is against the public interest. And therefore to
expose those lies is well within the ambit of larger public interest.
Further, in the larger public interest it is
informed to this Hon’ble PIO that a person named JHOOTHI DEVI R/o AZ-747, Rani
Bagh, New Delhi – 110034 gave affidavit to court & on page 13 para 5 that
she does not have a passport. . . . (Annexure 1 is certified copy from court with
that line highlighted). Also the certified copy from court of her complete
affidavit of 14 pages is annexed as annexure 2 to 15 for your kind perusal.
Provided further that the RTI applicant allows the public authority to either
send the information directly to him or to the concerned Hon’ble Court of Ld MM
Ms. Joshila Devi Surtalwala Dwarka Courts Case no.15/7/16 JHOOTHI DEVI Versus ATUR
CHATUR & ors in larger public interest.
FAè
Pointwise reply not provided. Please provide pointwise reply. Since a person
holding two government identity cards with two different names is a criminal
offence & the same had been disclosed to the PIO via proofs annexed with
the concerned RTI request hence it comes within the larger public interest
& PIO shall have disclosed information to all those questions which the PIO
feels come under larger public interest but he did not paid attention to those
& outrightly rejected the RTI with an equivocate response which possibly
hints favors or something else known best to the concerned PIO. This also presents
clearly before the FAA the half-heartedly nature of the PIO in handling the
RTI’s. The PIO provided equivocate answers & did not bothered to forward
part of queries (if any) which related to any other PIO u/s 6(3) of the RTI
Act’2005.
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
First Appeal – Rejecting of RTI through Equivocate Reply to
RTI by PIO Passport Office
To Dated 01/12/2016
First Appellate
Authority,
Joint Secretary
(PSP) & Chief Passport Officer,
Ministry of External Affairs,
Patiala House, New Delhi-110001
Sub:- First
Appeal u/s 19(1) of RTI Act 2005
With reference to Ref.No.420/RTIA/RPO/13, Dated 31.11.2016
Respected Sir,
A.
That providing equivocate answers in
against the spirit of RTI Act’2005. That providing equivocate response means
providing no response or denying RTI.
B.
That I requested within RTI concerned
to "Please do not club the information to the points even if the
information is repeated" but this request has also been ignored & I
have been provided with an equivocate response by the Hon'ble PIO which is
against the basic spirit of RTI Act'2005.
C.
That since a person holding two
government identity cards with two different names is a criminal offence &
the same had been disclosed to the PIO via proofs annexed within the concerned
RTI request hence it was in public interest but still the PIO withheld such
information the disclosure of which is clearly within larger public interest
but PIO did not paid attention to all those & outrightly rejected the
entire RTI with an equivocate response which possibly hints connivance/ favors
or something else known best to the concerned PIO only.
D.
That this also presents clearly
before this Hon’ble FAA the half-heartedly nature of the PIO in handling the
RTI’s. The PIO provided equivocate answers & did not bothered to forward
part of queries (if any) which related to any other PIO u/s 6(3) of the RTI
Act’2005.
PRAYER:-
(1)
The PIO be directed to immediately
release this information which he has denied in the light of above facts &
circumstances.
(2)
The further information shall be
provided free of cost i.e., the applicant/ undersigned be exempted in view of
section 7(6) of RTI Act 2005 from payment of any further fee payable by me for
supplying of requested information on account of default on the part of PIO to
supply information within prescribed time.
(3)
Action & Penalty against erring
PIO as per section 20 of RTI Rules’2005
Other reliefs &
orders as this Hon’ble FAA deems fit in the light of above facts &
circumstances.
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
(RTI + Action) against Wife via same representation vis-à-vis
Delhi High Court (Lego-Technical Fallacy)
To Dated:-
09/07/2016
DELHI HIGH COURT
SHER SHAH ROAD
Delhi-110003
Sub:- LETTER REQUESTING ACTION
Respected Sir/ Madam,
BACKGROUND:- As per the ten enclosures
to this letter, in year 2009 “JHOOTHI DEVI” after marriage changed her name to
“PATIVRATA DEVI” & even got an aadhar card number 1234 7658
2039 issued with name “PATIVRATA DEVI” on it. Enclosures also
include proofs which show that till 2015 she uses this name “PATIVRATA DEVI” explicitly
but within 2015 itself she applied & subsequently got her voter card number
QWK1738273 issued with name “JHOOTHI DEVI” on it (without putting
on record any name change proofs). In 2016 i.e., after changing her name &
domestic residence she files domestic violence case no.16/4/16
with Ld. MM Ms. Joshila Devi Surtalwala.
Is it a criminal offence for the same person
to possess one aadhar card with name “PATIVRATA DEVI” & one voter card with
name “JHOOTHI DEVI” at the same time. If Yes, an appropriate action is
requested by your esteemed authority wrt above information.
What is the legal validity of the above
numbered complaint which is filed by changing her name without putting on
record any name change proofs. Is such a complaint feasible lego-technically.
An appropriate action is requested by your esteemed authority in respect
thereof.
What is the legal validity of above numbered
complaint under domestic violence act if there is a possibility of court record
tampering & the complainant &/or her lawyer has even obtained &/or
forged the signatures of Ld. MM on such tampered records (MEMO). An appropriate
action is requested by your esteemed authority in respect thereof.
Enclosures:-
1.
Affidavit of name change from “JHOOTHI
DEVI” to “PATIVRATA DEVI” dated 31st Dec’2009
2.
Back side of above Affidavit
3.
Super Enlarged view of newspaper ad
of name from “JHOOTHI DEVI” to “PATIVRATA DEVI”
4.
Enlarged view of above newspaper ad
5.
Photocopy of above newspaper ad
6.
Signatures of “PATIVRATA DEVI” dated
04/01/2015
7.
Signatures of “PATIVRATA DEVI” dated
02/01/2015
8.
Signatures of “PATIVRATA DEVI” dated
07/01/2015
9.
Handwriting of “PATIVRATA DEVI” for
which the date is on next enclosure
10. Signatures
of “PATIVRATA DEVI” dated 26/12/2010
I am sending a Blank
Postal Order no. 32F 293854
of Rs. 10 dated 04/05/2016 is
attached herewith. Kindly fill the PIO details as it is the duty
of PIO to provide reasonable assistance u/s 5 (3) of
the RTI act to applicant. The requested information shall be supplied
free of charge in case the same could not be supplied within 30 days u/s 7(6)
of RTI Act 2005. Please do not club the information to the points even if the
information is repeated.
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
Letter Requesting Action against Wife &/or Others within
Judiciary for allowing Legally & Technically invalid complaint under the
garb of Dowry Complaints against Men/ Husbands
BEFORE THE
HON’BLE COURT OF PRINCIPAL JUDGE, DWARKA FAMILY COURTS, DELHI
CC NO. 16/4/16 OF 2016 (MM MS. Joshila Devi Surtalwala)
IN
THE MATTER OF:
JHOOTHI
DEVI …COMPLAINANT
VERSUS
SH.
ATUR CHATUR & ORS ...
RESPONDENT
NDOH:- 18.10.2016
LETTER REQUESTING ACTION ON
BEHALF OF RESPONDENT
MOST RESPECTFULLY
SHOWETH
(1) BACKGROUND:- As per the ten enclosures to this letter, in
year 2009 “JHOOTHI DEVI” after marriage changed her name to “PATIVRATA DEVI”
& even got an aadhar card number 1234 9483 1029
issued with name “PATIVRATA DEVI” on it. Enclosures also include proofs which
show that till 2015 she used this name “PATIVRATA DEVI” explicitly but within
2015 itself she applied & subsequently got her voter card number QWK9283746
issued with name “JHOOTHI DEVI” on it (without putting on record any name
change proofs). Next year in 2016 i.e., after changing her name & after
voluntarily shunning her domestic relationship she files complaint under
domestic violence act with case CC no.16/4/16 with Ld. MM Ms. Joshila
Devi Surtalwala.
(2) Is it a criminal offence for the same person to possess one aadhar card
with name “PATIVRATA DEVI” & one voter card with name “JHOOTHI DEVI” at the
same time. If Yes, an appropriate action is requested by your esteemed
authority wrt above information.
(3) What is the legal validity of the above numbered complaint which is
filed by changing her name without putting on record any name change proofs. Is
such a complaint feasible lego-technically. An appropriate action is requested
by your esteemed authority in respect thereof.
(4) What is the legal validity of above numbered complaint under domestic
violence act if there is a possibility of court record tampering & the
complainant &/or her lawyer has even obtained &/or forged the
signatures of Ld. MM on such tampered records (MEMO). An appropriate action is
requested by your esteemed authority in respect thereof.
PRAYER:-
(1)
I humbly pray for action in
the light of above facts & circumstances.
(2)
Stay on this case CC
33/4/14 due to above lego-technical reasons.
(3)
Request to decide perjury
application first in the interest of justice.
(4)
Dismissal of this plaint CC
no. 33/4/14 as per above stated facts.
(5)
Any other relief/orders as
this Hon’ble Court deems fit.
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
ROHINI, DELHI RESPONDENT
DATED: (PARTY-IN-PERSON)
Enclosures:-
11.
Affidavit of name change from “JHOOTHI DEVI”
to “PATIVRATA DEVI” dated 31st Dec’2009
12.
Back side of above Affidavit
13.
Super Enlarged view of newspaper ad of name change
from “JHOOTHI DEVI” to “PATIVRATA DEVI”
14.
Enlarged view of above newspaper ad
15.
Photocopy of above newspaper ad
16.
Signatures of “PATIVRATA DEVI” dated
04/01/2015
17.
Signatures of “PATIVRATA DEVI” dated
02/01/2015
18.
Signatures of “PATIVRATA DEVI” dated 07/01/2015
19.
Handwriting of “PATIVRATA DEVI” for which
the date is on next enclosure
Signatures of “PATIVRATA
DEVI” dated 26/12/2010
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
First Appeal against Registrar Vigilance (Delhi High Court)
for No Action againt Judicial Officer of Delhi (DJS) - & Approval by PIO
To Dated 13/12/2016
First Appellate
Authority,
Registrar
(Establishment), Room No. 101,
First Floor, Administrative Block,
Delhi High Court, New Delhi-110003
Sub:- First
Appeal u/s 19(1) of RTI Act 2005
With reference to No.11928/RTI/DHC/512/2016 Dated: 11/12/2016
Respected Sir,
E.
In the above reference number I
received one sheet with reference CJS/1560-Dt.11.12.2016
F.
That corresponding letter (mentioned below)
refers to the letter which I posted on 08/10/2016 and regarding which I sent
this concerned RTI request on 10/11/2016 to which the above reference number
relates. In this regard it is most humbly submitted as follows:-
G.
Point 1 of the corresponding letter
is an assertion/ information wrt background in the light of supporting facts
& documents annexed thereto. This is not allegation as tried to be
presented by the respectable PIO.
H.
Point 2 of the corresponding letter
is a query in which information is requested whether possession of two
completely different government identities is a criminal offence or not but the
PIO has tried to present it also as an allegation.
I.
In Point 2 of corresponding letter an
appropriate action was requested from the esteemed authority ONLY IF the answer
to the above part of query in point 2 is YES and the Hon'ble PIO has not
bothered to provide information thereto.
J.
Point 3 of corresponding letter has
been reiterated as it is.
K.
Point 4 of corresponding letter has
been totally ignored by the Hon'ble PIO. In Point 4 the concerned authority has
been duly informed that on the MEMO there is a possibility of court record
tampering. And in such tampering either the Ld. MM's signatures have been obtained
or have been forged.
IS THAT NOT SERIOUS?
IS THAT NOT A JOB OF ADMINISTRATIVE?
DOES THAT NOT DEMAND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION?
L.
Point 4 has been deliberately ignored
by the PIO completely because both the expected situations come under the
utmost gravity wrt a Ld MM's court's working because the two conditions arise
out of that viz., Either Signatures of Ld MM have been obtained OR Signatures
of the Ld MM have been forged. Doesn't that come under Administrative Action?
Hence this point no. 4 has been deliberately ignored by the Hon'ble PIO &
thereby in CJS/1560-Dt.11.12.2016 there has been hand-written that no
administrative action is caned. I checked dictionary to find out
the meaning of caned but I am unable to understand what that means.
M.
Within Point 4 of corresponding
letter, I even gave a written request for an appropriate action based on such
unethical practices in the court of Ld MM concerned but even after that this
point has been ignored & missed out completely.
N.
NOW COMING BACK TO THE RTI POINTS AS
FOLLOWS:-
O.
In Point 6 of RTI concerned I have
asked information "6. Kindly supply information Is it a criminal offence
for the same person to possess one aadhar card 1234 3423 9210 with name “PATIVRATA
DEVI” & one voter card QWK1827374 with name “JHOOTHI DEVI” at the same
time." But the PIO has not supplied information.
P.
In Point 9 of RTI concerned which
relates to Point 4 of corresponding letter I have not been supplied information
& this point has been completely ignored by the Hon'ble PIO. The three
paras above which mentions Point 4 of corresponding letter are requested to be
read with this para & are not being repeated herein for brevity.
Q.
Last but not the least I requested
within RTI concerned to "Kindly provide the information to each point
separately. Please do not club the information to the points even if the
information is repeated" but this request has also been ignored & I
have been provided with an equivocate response by the Hon'ble PIO which is
against the basic spirit of RTI Act'2005.
R.
Since no administrative action has
been taken on the basis of point 4 of corresponding letter & that point has
been totally ignored by the PIO vide CJS/1560-Dt.11.12.2016 & even point 9
of RTI which directly relates to point 4 of corresponding letter ignores
completely & equivocate answers have been provided hence there might be a
possibility that the administrative authority & PIO might have reached a
common understanding in order to miss/ignore/mislead this part completely which
if enquired by this Hon’ble FAA might bring forth the reasons for such
connected actions.
PRAYER:-
(4)
The PIO be directed to immediately
release this information which he has denied in the light of above facts &
circumstances.
(5)
The further information shall be
provided free of cost i.e., the applicant/ undersigned be exempted in view of
section 7(6) of RTI Act 2005 from payment of any further fee payable by me for
supplying of requested information on account of default on the part of PIO to
supply information within prescribed time.
(6)
Action & Penalty against erring
PIO as per section 20 of RTI Rules’2005
(7)
Other reliefs & orders as this
Hon’ble FAA deems fit in the light of above facts & circumstances.
I am sending Five
Blank Postal Orders 32F 123456
32F 123456 32F 123456 32F 123456 32F 123456
of Rs. 10 each dated 01/12/2016
is attached herewith. Kindly fill the details as it is the duty of PIO/FAA to
provide reasonable assistance u/s 5 (3) of the RTI act to applicant.
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
First Appeal Hearing by Delhi District Courts without
specifying the reasons to the appellant u/s 27 & 28 of RTI Act
To Dated 23/07/2016
Public Information
Officer,
South-West District,
Dwraka District Courts,
New Delhi-110075
Sub:- Request for information u/s 6 & 7 of RTI Act 2005.
Respected Sir,
I request the following information under
Right to Information ACT’2005 viz.,
1.
Certified copy of Rules framed by
Appropriate Government under section-27 of RTI Act,2005, whereby an Appellant
under section - 19(1) needs to be called for hearing or heard personally by
Appellate Authority for deciding the Appeal under section 19(1) of RTI Act,
2005.
2.
Certified copy of Rules framed by
Competent Authority under section-28 of RTI Act,2005, whereby an Appellant
under section - 19(1) needs to be called for hearing or heard personally by
Appellate Authority for deciding the Appeal under section 19(1) of RTI Act,
2005.
3.
Certified copy of Rules framed under
Section-27 and/or 28 of RTI Act, 2005, based on which Sh. ATUR CHATUR C/o Q-7/77,
GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi - 110085 had been called for hearing by Appellate
Authority in Appeal dated 22/07/2016 preferred by him against PIO's order
reference no. No.123/RTI/PIO/SW/RC/ID:129, 130 & 131 Delhi, Dated the 19th
August, 2016
4.
Certified copy of the say/remarks
submitted or submissions made by PIO before First Appellate Authority in
compliance of Section-19(5) of RTI Act, 2005, with respect to First Appeal
dated 24/08/2016 preferred by him & arising out of RTI Application/s of Sh.
ATUR CHATUR C/o Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi - 110085 concerning PIO's
order reference no. No.123/RTI/PIO/SW/RC/ID:129, 130 & 131 Delhi, Dated the
19th August, 2016
I am sending a Blank
Postal Order no. 32F 123423 of Rs. 10 dated 01/01/2016
is attached herewith. Kindly fill the PIO details as it is the duty of PIO to
provide reasonable assistance u/s 5 (3) of the RTI act to applicant. The
requested information shall be supplied free of charge in case the same could
not be supplied within 30 days u/s 7(6) of RTI Act 2005. Kindly provide the
information to each point separately. Please do not club the information to the
points even if the information is repeated.
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
First Appeal NOT mandatory (FAA Advise by RTI applicant to
Delhi District Courts)
To Dated 11/07/2016
First Appellate
Authority,
South-West District,
Room No. 401,
Dwraka District Courts,
New Delhi-110075
Sub:- with reference to RTI No:376/16 (First Appellate
Authority) Date of Issue not mentioned. Date of First Appeal Hearing fixed at 3:30pm
on date 17/07/2016
NDOH:- 17/07/2016
Respected Sir,
wrt above ref no., I
would like to advise the Hon’ble First Appellate Authority (FAA) as follows:-
5.
That there is no statutory &
mandatory provision for such hearing under the RTI Act’2005 and hence the
Appellant has no intention to appear for such hearing under the RTI Act and the
appeal be decided based on below points.,
(a)
Submissions made in first appeal
(b)
The concerned RTI’s and the ten
enclosures’s therein submitted by RTI Applicant to the Hon’ble PIO
(c)
The Corresponding letter/s on the
basis of which these RTI’s were filed (requested to be summoned from the
Hon’ble Court of Ld MM Ms. Joshila Devi Surtalwala Case no: CC 16/4/16)
(d)
An additional photo identity document
dated 29/09/2016 of the person named PATIVRATA DEVI who played
fraud by misrepresentation/ concealment of her true identity and filed
complaint using an illegal name JHOOTHI DEVI R/o AZ-747, Rani Bagh, New Delhi –
110034 before esteemed Dwarka courts.
(e)
That the undersigned filed perjury
application on 28.05.2016 before the Hon’ble Courts of Ld MM Ms. Joshila Devi Surtalwala
case no. CC No.16/4/16 (requested to be summoned from the concerned Hon’ble
Court) and requested to be taken into consideration while disposing this appeal
(f)
That this Hon’ble Court of Ld. MM Ms.
Joshila Devi Surtalwala ordered dated 28.05.2016 ordered the petitioner to file
reply to perjury application of undersigned as mentioned above alongwith
affidavit qua financial status but the petitioner is playing clever hide &
seek game before the concerned Hon’ble court (with support of concerned Ld MM)
as follows:- è On next date the
petitioner sent her mother with a copy of affidavit qua financial status &
cleverly did not bothered to send her reply to perjury application (despite she
being backed by a top law firm of the country as per her petition) & I
orally requested the concerned Ld MM to pass a NO SAY ORDER but the Ld MM
neither accepted my oral request nor mentioned reasons thereof (this Hon’ble
FAA is requested to summon the audio/video recordings dated 28/06/2016 from the
concerned court for verification)
(g)
That till date undersigned has never
been provided with “Pamphlet of Mediation” which is mandatory as per law to be
sent alongwith the copy of petition under the domestic violence act but despite
requests by the undersigned before concerned Hon’ble Court his requests were
turned down with warnings with dire consequences. Hence, neither legally &
nor technically the concerned Hon’ble Court ever gave the undersigned an
opportunity for mediation which is against the law for the time being in force
in India.
(h)
That the undersigned is a loving
husband & also an ethical person. Being a loving husband he tried/ still
trying efforts to reunite with his wife for the sake of his family values &
Indian culture. And being an ethical person he did/doing his best to bring
forth the wrongs done before this Hon’ble court/ other authorities being an
honest citizen of India. And honesty is not a crime in India as per my limited
knowledge (please correct me if being honest has become a crime in India).
6.
That Identity fraud is a synonym of
unlawful identity change.
7.
That if any person/ authority
connives with anyone who plays fraud/ misrepresentation/ concealment of true
identity then such person/s are also liable for punishment under various laws
for the time being in force in India.
8.
That if any FIR / Legal Action is
initiated against any person by your esteemed institution then I shall be
provided a copy of that & all related communications, noting sheets,
marking sheets also may kindly be provided to me alongwith decision of FAA if
this Hon’ble FAA deems fit.
Enclosed:- Latest Additional
Document dated 29/07/2016 proving that the true legal identity of
this person is PATIVRATA DEVI but she unlawfully changed her identity to JHOOTHI
DEVI without following a legal name change procedure hence read with above
point 2 it is also known as Identity Fraud.
(ATUR CHATUR)
C/o Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085
Email: aturchatur@yahoo.com
Phone: 09873540498
Get Find Look Available Needed Need Provide Search man cell delhi men cell delhi man helps man cell delhi men cell delhi man help (9873540498) Haryana Punjab Panipat Rohini Rajasthan Pitampura Ludhiana Uttar Pradesh Sector VIII Rohini Rohtak Want Get Looking for Learn man cell delhi men cell delhi man helps fraud case against my father and brother what to do when wife leaves home Process to with draw 498a false 498a/406 & 34 common intention mental cruelty and conviction rate in 498a FIR after Charge Sheet Next steps after counselling in 498a and dv case mediation u/s 89 cpc cross before charge framing 498a cross ecamination of wife 406 stridhan tristy husband 34 common intention in criminal conspiracy 120b crpc 468, 470 Leniency in quantum of punishment for protracted trials a myth False 498, 406 and 323 help defend 498a legel guidance required in cheque bounce legal guidance free for domestic violence addition of new section after submission of police report adducing additional evidences charges framing Who can register a complaint on adultery against wife against husband with evidences criminal case filed by nri perjury or private complaint on public prosecutor for biased law practices unfair practices unethical cpractices by court staff personal loan procedure guarantor security fir and charge sheet steps expert views are required forged ledger account window dressing cheque issuer absconding lifting of corporate veil lift he investigative veil nri with crime Seeking advice on a hit and run case salman khan mumbai lawyer jhanvi shilpa reddy keshav reddy foster brother incest love affiar canada settle after killing false story to parents of husband & police revealed in police report recovery of money from borker-mumbai based agent finacial difficulties feasibility study cheque bounce wife oured kerosene and petrol mix to my house Ipc 304a trespass illegal trespas illegal confinement of my wife husband blames father in law for illegally confining his wife man cell delhi men cell delhi man help 498a guidance domestic violence false domestic violence 125 crpc perjury rti police caw cell rti charge sheet man cell delhi men cell delhi man help in Rohini Haryana mediation counselling ddrs dispute resolution reconciliation voluntary stridhan shtridhan 406/34 323 307 302 304-B 120-B 191 193 195 340 211 209 ipc cpc civil procedure code criminal procedure code man cell delhi men cell delhi man help for crime against woman cell delhi Find man cell delhi men cell delhi man help for crime against men cell in delhi men in distress cctv audio video recording recording of police in caw cell forced signatures taken by police case file missing from court records man cell delhi men cell delhi man help Summer Package lawyer consultant expert drafting in Rohini Haryana man cell delhi men cell delhi man help for how to fight false court case how to write written statement order vii rule 11 section 89 CPC memo for mediation Find man cell delhi men cell delhi man helps Want man cell delhi men cell delhi man help in Rohini Search man cell delhi men cell delhi man help Search man cell delhi men cell delhi man helps tep eviction notice lawyer notice legal notice restitution of conjugal rights effective lawyer in family disputes legal cell legal analysis of matrimonial laws in india a case analysis how to get certified documents from court gtalk chat history fetching forensic analysis hw to get certified documents from court self applying time barred credit card dues withdraw my new open account limitation act law of limitations wrt condonation of delay condonation of perjury socio economic offenses in metropolitans false marriage sham marriage vexatious complaint concocted story Will there be any obstacles in my selection due t physical handicap selection criteria for 498a wife shaadi com jeevansathi sites bharat matrimony & other matrimony sites filled with floods of 498a women how to marry a decent family without 498a background advise needed no action by police after register of fir action taken report atr plz help urgently vis-a-vis motor vehicles act filed by husband as a counter attack to 498a fir by wife car accident case misuse of cheque by bouncing it self against the law & also an abuse of law technical error legal technical reasons fraud by a ugc university in admissions & employee selection recruitment police verification for central govt job mandatory i want 1st year law books online where to apply land encroachment legal help required trespas criminal trespass bouncers goons local gunmen trespassing by wife in husband's parents property how to call the all witness of the FIR case consensual sex does not amount to rape can i use rti to get a complete compliant copy from gurgaon police authorities chances to quash dv proceeding under 482 crpc and success rate of quash in delhi high court rooster dependency query on cheque issued by third party consensual sex not rape delhi high court contradictory versions proof and thereby matter not even triable due to the contradictory versions of prosecution rape survivor's testimony not sufficient to prosecute high court writ - 307 ipc advise on ipc 313 (forceful abortion) without wife consent abortion without husband's consent aborted foetus foetus without informing husband domestic violience protection officer When magistrate decides ingredients of any section of ipc immunity to judges & lawyers of supreme court immunity provided to protection officers criminal case against unitech criminal case against wife sanctity of woman filing domestic violence cases on multiple husbands private complaint u/s 420,406,506,r/s34 non recording 161 of police witness what to do sessions revision appeal regarding next steps - false allegation 498a, 323, 406 498a case withdraw dividend warrants quash for dv by husband alone What to do? please help Writ petition format sample application how to file a writ in high court dismissal from government job without proper enquiry help me regarding 498a ongoing trial case When my mother and sister would be acquitted from 498a - hc bank vs employee caught in 498a drama by wife court case filed on bank alibi in wife's money removal from husband's joint account allegation of adultery on wife protest petition how to u/s 200 crpc procedure r/w 156 (3) mandatory or not steps after private criminal complaint is dismissed u/s 203 how to get respite from ipc 494 and 420 my brother in law is illegally using our permanent address how to prove adultery against a wife 420 case abuse of section 354 ipc by women against women harassment by a lawyer by 5 forgery cases so far any relief against a powerful lawyer cctv camera's installed in house can these proofs be used please save me and my family from threatening family members of wife what to do criminal intimidation charge sheet process in 498a case findings in anticipatory bail suitable ground for divorce can session court reduce the amount of bail/surety bond through corruption graft gratification by judge metropolitan magistrate district magistrate office delhi police investigation in crpc 156(3) lacunas in police iinvestigation mistake of law mistake of fact b report police action - online status -shows dropped rejoining in 498a chanrge sheet notice on wrong address in n.i. act ground for challenge settlement procedure in 498a in patna high court cheque bounce 2 yr ago legal notice not given to defaulter rejoining of the names removed by the police from chargesheet how to proove forgery case on xerox of forged document cheque issued but instructions not to deposit validity under negotiable instruments act provisions to include new evidence before argument recusal of judge before argument stage can prosecution evidence be brought at later stage after perjury application is filed in the same court perjury in dv act and 498a publishing an article in newpaper of perjury action by court can i file perjury basing on the eyewitness statements tutions Haryana Rohini lawyers family dispute divorce rcr restitution of conjugal rights sec-9 hma hindu marriage act family courts act rti on court rti on police man cell delhi men cell delhi man helps in Sonepat Punjabi Bagh searching for man cell delhi men cell delhi man help man rights activists men right activist man cell delhi men cell delhi man helps in Maurya Enclave Meera Bagh Rajasthan Gujarat Apartment taruna batra income affidavit property dispute extortion assets affidavit compromise mou memorandum of understanding in Sector3 Rohini ,man cell delhi men cell delhi man help for women problem wife problem man cell delhi men cell delhi man help fordouble marriage bigamy polyandry misandry patriarchy feminism feminist atur chatur counselling criminal defamation civil defamation civil case quasi civil quasi criminal judgment perjury judgments latest domestic violence judgements delhi man cell delhi men cell delhi man helps for fraud on court retaliation to using my fundamental rieht guaranteed vide constitution of india find man cell delhi men cell delhi man helps for constitutional rights high court writ appeal in sessions section 397 domestic violence bail application high court bail application u/s 438 bail rejection bail cancellation challenging of summons summon challenge not maintainable in the eyes of law man cell delhi men cell delhi man help for tax evasion petition adultery incest sapinda u/s 497 ipc amendments required to book the woman in the ambit of adultery man cell delhi men cell delhi man help in rohini Haryana man cell delhi men cell delhi man help for english science need search Want a man cell delhi men cell delhi man help in maurya enclave pushpanjali Punjab need a man cell delhi men cell delhi man help in Panipat man cell delhi men cell delhi man helps for Haryana man cell delhi men cell delhi man helps in rohini get man cell delhi men cell delhi man help in rithala find look get need want search man cell delhi men cell delhi man help man cell delhi men cell delhi man helps women empowerment women organizations DCW NCW delhi commission for women national commission for women national human rights commission finance minister of india metropolitan magistrate asj supreme court judge high court judge chief justice of india registrar vigilance of high court delhi rti on registrar vigilance of high court chief secrtary of delhi high court supreme court registrar in Rohtak Seach Get find need Want man cell delhi men cell delhi man helps man cell delhi men cell delhi man help in meera bagh rajasthan get find man cell delhi men cell delhi man help good lawyers in delhi family court lwyer In delhi civil lawyer top criminal lawyer in delhi public interst litigation in punjabi bagh club paschim enclave multan nagar sector 13 rohini man cell delhi men cell delhi man help for section 227 challenge appeal revision review 131 district judge family court Dwarka district courts delhi daily orders cause list plea bargaining crime cannot be settled maxim doctrine of equity the one who seeks equity must perform equity do equity if you want seek equity no one can take advantage of his her own wrongs in rhini sector 9 8 7 VIII VII IX XIII searching man cell delhi men cell delhi man help looking man cell delhi men cell delhi man help for criminal application civil application bail iapplication drafting nothing incriminating self incrimination is not allowed under the law law of natural justice right to be heard law of land prostitution procrastination destitute abla naari provisions sacred sanctity of a woman rape survivor’s testimony ram jethmalani’s bail application plea rejected wife doing job concealed job info by wife concealment unclean hands fraud on court abuse of the process of law sworn affidavit on oath lying on oath perjury after cross examination knowingly made a false statement on merits dismissal dismiss in default disposed off impugned order men rights foundation atur Chatur foundation dahej kanoon ki aadh mein patni sataye to humen bhi batayen judge JFC family court matrimonial disputes child rights pocso posco child rights activists human rights of children shared parenting hague committee recommendation child kidnapping father kidnaps his own son mother kidnaps her son dauther & brings to india nri extortion short marriage annulment divorce based on cruelty 13(1)(ia) rtr right to residence alternate accomodation right to inherited property rights of a wife rights of a daughter in law women cant be respondents in domestic violence section 18 19 20 22 compensation without medical proofs neera singh judgment tax evasion mil fil dil bil sil government jobs father in law income tax return of mother in law puneet kaur judgment no dowry declaration amendments intention to fraud on court deliberately knowingly the consequences material loss to the opposite party injunction caveat restraining orders humiliation needs wants man cell delhi men cell delhi man help for 498a man cell delhi men cell delhi man help in Haryana get need search look looking conversation man cell delhi men cell delhi man help nri arrested in india for debt in dubai iinterim maintenance in dv case without affidavit Steps to be implemented Ipc-279_urgent basis Email and mobile hack Regarding passport issuance Stay validity Procedure in criminal appeal 498a help Cheque bounce case sec 138, nri accused man cell delhi men cell delhi man help improvement in Rohini Teacher man cell delhi men cell delhi man help in Haryana Need Want Get Find man cell delhi men cell delhi man helps man cell delhi men cell delhi man help in Investigation Units on Crime against Women Amendments to the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Bill Government welcomes SC decision on 66A Fine for harassment of women at workplace Ludhiana Punjabi Bagh Panipat Punjab Domestic violence act Rajasthan man cell delhi men cell delhi man helps Teachers man cell delhi men cell delhi man help in Haryana T.V. Tower search for man cell delhi men cell delhi man helps in Rohini Setor 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 17 18 24 Search for man cell delhi men cell delhi man help in Prashant Vihat Mourya Enclave Pitampuar Rohini man cell delhi men cell delhi man helps vihar Uttar Pradesh Sec 1 sec 2 sec 3 sec 4 Remedy against issue of process Original documents misplaced by court staff Refund of wrongly credited cheque Chequ bounce 498a - anticipatory bail Need legal openion Regarding passport issuance Email and mobile hack To know effectiveness of bill no 151 of 2015 Stay validity Dental surgeon carelessness negligence 498a chargesheet_ can i go for discharge Atrocity charges Time taken from charge sheet to getting the case in court Adult story website Is inquiry u/s. 202 of cr.p.c. mandatory ? Procedure in criminal appeal Complaint sent to national human rights commission Private complaint question Paschim Enclave Bank Vihar, Rohini, Sector3 Rohini, Rohini VIII, Sec7 Rohini, all sectors of Rohini Haryana, Paschim Enclave, Sonepat Chowk, Pubjabi Bagh, Sangam Apartment, Vikas Apartment, Looking seeking finding searching for man cell delhi men cell delhi man help man cell delhi men cell delhi man helps in rohini Haryana Rohtak punjabi bagh Panipat rajasthan mourya enclave Punjab Ludhiana Uttar Pradesh Look need search find get man cell delhi men cell delhi man help man cell delhi men cell delhi man helps Prashnt Saraswati, Punjab Lancers Convent, Police Lines Haryana, find a man cell delhi men cell delhi man help in ROHINI HARYANA (Ph:- 9873540498) Avantika,sector-1 rohini, greenview appartments,sector-3 , rohini, delhi-110085, sector- VIII , ROHINI, Interim argument, man cell delhi men cell delhi man help, Maintenance, man cell delhi men cell delhi man helps, SECTOR-1, 2,3,4, 5,6, 7,8,9, 10,11,12,13, 14,15,16, 17, 18, 19,20,21, 22,23, 24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32, ROHINI, Rohini Extension,SAINIK VIHAR, Ashok vihar, Shree Nagar, Shri Nagr, Shakur Basti, Punjabi Bagh, Rajouri Garden ,Raja Garden, Rohtak, Paschim Enclave, Punjabi Bagh Club, Guru Harkrishan Nagar , Bhera Enclave, Peera Grhi, Sonepat, Paschimi Enclave, C S E Complex, JIMS SECTOR-3, ROHINI, Caw cell Enclave, HARYANA, ND Market, PP Block,KD Block, Car Market, Laxmi Appartment, Luxmi Appartment, Sector IX Rohini, X,XI,XII,VIII,VII,VI, Sainik Vihar, D-Block Ashok vihar, T.V. Tower, Online man cell delhi men cell delhi man help for 498a, Spoken 498a man cell delhi men cell delhi man helps for Written Interim maintenance & Spoken & 498a Conversation, 498a Dowry prohibition act Course in Rohini Haryana ZONE, Rajasthan, Meera Bagh, A -Block, B-Block, GH-8 Rohtak, Spoken 498a Methods at Rohtak Central Enclave, GH-6, GH-7 & GH-4, Delhi-110034, Delhi-110063 delhi-110027, man cell delhi men cell delhi man helps for 498a Dowry prohibition act at ROHINI & HARYANA & Interim maintenance Expert Teacher man cell delhi men cell delhi man help 498a at Rohtak, Uttar Pradesh, Ludhiana , 498a Dowry prohibition act* , British 498A , American 498a, British Rti on court 498a, Spoken 498a with stress on Interim maintenance, Beginner 498a, Advanced 498A, Fluent 498a man cell delhi men cell delhi man helps,498a Medium & Delhi based 498a man cell delhi men cell delhi man help man cell delhi men cell delhi man helps Wanted Available, Need Get, Find a Best man cell delhi men cell delhi man help 498a Charge sheet , 498a as a Foreign Rti on court, Indian 498a , Mixed 498a man cell delhi men cell delhi man help Wanted in Rohini, HARYANA , West Delhi, North Delhi Area for stress on Spoken 498A rather than plain Tax evsion petition, Public School Emglish man cell delhi men cell delhi man help, Rti on court man cell delhi men cell delhi man helps for Indian Rti on courts Hindi, Punjabi, Urdu, Greek , West Punjabi Bagh, Club Road, Punjabi Bagh Club, Gujarat Apartment, Caw cell Enclave, Domestic violence act Enclave, Milan Apartment, Rajasthan, Bhera Enclave, subhavna niketan, maharana pratap enclave, sharda appartment , jhulelal society, DDA Janta Flats, LIG Flats, HIG Flats, MIG Flats Haryana, Crime against women cell Appartment , Suvidha kunj , Mausam Appartment, Rajasthan, tower apartment, DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT ENCLave, Punjab, nishant kunj, sarswati vihar, chander lok,harsh vihar , chander lok enclave, qp, rd, royal arcade, anand vihar, Haryana village, rajdhani enclave, Rohini East Rohini West, Wazirpur, Haryana T.V.Towers, Maurya Enclave, Deepali, Netaji Subhash Place, Gujrat Apartment, Pitampura, Outer Ring Road,Cooking, Hobbies, Embroideries, Pottery Dp3, Candle Dp3, Stuff Toys, Soft Toys man cell delhi men cell delhi man help Centre in Rohini, Wall Painting, Screen Painting, Summer Vacation 498a Two Months 498a Packs for School Students, Charge sheets for Housewives, Beginner level 498a to Advanced Level , Sunder Appartment , Millennium Apartment, Shivaji Appartments, Akash Kunj,MIG Flats First Floor, Second Floor Ground Floor Flute, Casio, Music,man cell delhi men cell delhi man help FOR Guitar, Hobbies man cell delhi men cell delhi man helps, Hobby 125 crpc, Painting, Drawing man cell delhi men cell delhi man help in Rohini, FU Block Haryana, Gopal Mandir, Uttar Pradesh, BH Block, BD Block, Ganga Triveni Apartment ,Vikas Sheel Apartment, Mother Dairy Rohini-85, Mother Divine School, St. Giri School, Ryan International, Bal Bharati School Rohini Branch, Prabhu Dayal, Data Ram Apartment, Navyug Aptt, Agarwal Millennium Tower, Jagriti Aptt, MTNL SBI MIG Staff Quarters, SBI Colony, Varun Niketan , Kapil Vihar, Tarun Enclave, Shakti Vihar, Sadbhawna Apartment, West Haryana, Ashok vihar, DHRUV APTTS , VASUNDHRA APTT,NILGIRI APTT ,ARYA APTT,ATAR Apartment, VIJAY VIHAR, Raza Pur Village, Haryana Village, GAYATRI APTT, PLOT 17 PLAZA SEC III ROHINI-85, AVANTIKA MKT Market, Main Road , Mangol Puri, Fourth Floor Commercial Complex, Rose Appartment Pocket B-9, POCKET 26, BLOCK F, Sector 4 Rohini, Divide Road of sec5 & sec 6, citizen Enclave, Rohini Complex Shakur Pur-92, Canara Bank Aptt, Bharat Aptt, AHINSA VIHAR , Khukhrain, Sai LIG Flats, Sai Baba Mandir, D C Chowk, Neelkanth , Golden Jubilee, Janta Flats, Agroha Kunj, Star apts, SFS Flats, DDA Flats, DDA Market, Kadambri, Sangam, Kewal Kunj, Guru Vandana, Uday Singh Palace, Welcome Printers Coop Group Housing Society, Panipat, Saraswati Appt, Dhudial APT, bANK vIHAR, Uttam Nagar, Pundrik Vihar, Vinay Nagar , Janak Puri, Lawrence Road, Ludhiana, Deep Central Market, Central Market 498a Dowry prohibition act man cell delhi men cell delhi man help man cell delhi men cell delhi man helps, Interim argument Interim arguments Maintenance, Maintenances, Amba Tower Adarsh, Vikas Surya Plaza, NN Mall, ICICI bANK Enclave, Platinum Enclave Raja Pur, New Saraswati Society, Manav Aptt, G-29 Farmer Appt, Ayodhya Enclave, Ayodhya Chowk , Shri Ram Chowk, Naveentam Antriksh, Nahar Pur Village, Multitech Chambers , Officers ENCLAVE, nEW sWASTIK kEDAR Cozy Chetak Sunrise Apartment, Gayatri Sardar Colony, Bhagya Laxmi Starlite New Modern Appartment, Dharam Kunj, Unitech Amusement Park Sector-10 Rohini, Swarn Jyanti Park, Japanese Park Sec9 Rohini, Teachers Enclave, Teachers Colony, Jhang Popular Jamuna Apptt, Ahinsa Vihar Akaask Kunj,Rang Rasain , Metro wALK, Delhi mETRO sTATION , Rohini East Rohini West Rithala 498a man cell delhi men cell delhi man help in Pitampura, Janta Colony , Platinum Enclave, Vasudha Vasundhra Lal Jyoti Pragti Sheel Aravali Sai BABA Apptt, PWD CPWD Housing Society in Rohini All Sectors , Satya Shanti Ekta Vihar, VINDHYACHAL , GGSS GBSS Avantika, C 9 Aman Society , HIG Flats, Kamdhenu Central School Kendriya VIDYALAYA, Savera City Plaza, RAJAPUR Panipat, Community Centre, Sunder Vihar, Rohtak, Ashoka Surya Rashmi Yadav SFS DDA aPT , Khalsa Taxi Stand, Sukhdham Apptt, Oriental Indraprastha Krishi, Priya Venus Shakti Maheshwari Ambika Bhagirathi Apptt, Maitri, New India apt, Vikrant Banda Bahadur Rose, Panipat , Sainik Vihar, Shri Nagar, Rishi Nagar, Ashok vihar, Shakur Basti, Rohini, Pitampura, Sonepat, Rohtak Punjabi Bagh, Bhagwan Dass Nagar, Parwana Prem Kutir Janhit Apptt, Dena Jai Puru Deluxe Apptt. We provide and welcome Best man cell delhi men cell delhi man helps Teachers Lecturers man cell delhi men cell delhi man help MAINTENANCE man cell delhi men cell delhi man helpS INTERIM ARGUMENTS MAINTENANCE for Mathematics 498a All Class 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Any Subject level Area Accounts Economics Science maths Hindi 498a Science Basic Computer & Internet 125 crpc Social Science MBA MCA BBA BBS & Rti on courts Rti on court Conversation Hindi 498a Spoken 498a Granner All Over Rohini Haryana.We also arrange Home Interim arguments & Group Sec 24 hma & Home man cell delhi men cell delhi man helps & Group Interim arguments. HARYANA man cell delhi men cell delhi man helpS sends all Rohini man cell delhi men cell delhi man helps, Rohtak, Haryana, Rajasthan, Panipat, Punjab, Maurya Enclave, Haryana 498a man cell delhi men cell delhi man helps for Vardhman Plaza, maurya enclave, rajasthan, Unique Prashnt Saraswati, Punjab, Lancers Convent, St. Margaret School, Prshant Vihar Complex., Vijeta Vihar, MTNL Staff Quarters, Police Lines Haryana, Keshav Mahavidyalaya, Keshav Puram, bank vihar aptt,sansad vihar, lig flats, qu block, suraksha enclave, Blocks ju, pp, dp, np, nd, mp, cp, kp, uu, fu, ru, hp, ju, vp, b block, a block, du, pd, gu, ju, ru, rp, shp 4, cu, tarun enclave, suvidha, shiva market , rama market, type II AU Block, type iii, type iv income tax colony, dhudial appartment, aggarwal chamber, vishakha enclave, gagan vihar, kapil vihar, ludhiana, niranjan vihar, kashmiri aptt, parijat aptt, bannu enclave, multan nagar, shubh enclave, caw cell, rajasthali appartment, SUMMER vaccation Package for School students, College students, Working Executives & Housewives, Hobby 125 crpc for School Girls , Ladies & working women, Secretarial Practise, Swimming, Yoga, Therapy, Natural Methods of Healing, Computer & INTERNET 125 CRPC FOR Kids, Computer Teachers for Basic Computer & Internet Teenagers, Schhol & College Students, Hobbies in Rohini & Haryana, Book Tax evsion petition Skills, Calligraphy, IncomeTax Colony, Spoken 498a, Interim maintenance, Tenses, Call Center 498a in Haryana, Rohini, Rajasthan, Domestic violence act, Gujrat Apartment, Green View Aptt, Lake View Apartment, Lok Vihar, Rohtak Club, IDPL Appartment, Jagat Vihar, M Block, Haryana Delhi 88, Delhi 34, Delhi 63, Engineers Enclave, Pundrik Vihar, Sagar Plaza, vp, Bhola RAM mARKET, Naveen Appartment, Sharda Niketan, Deepali Enclave, Parijat Appartment, Crime against women cell, Crime against women celli, Pitampura, Vikas Surya Plaza, Road number 44, Road Number 41, Sanskrit Nagar Sector XIV RHN, SUNEHRI BAGH APPTT,GREEN VALLEY APTT , HIL Apptt, MANGLAM PLACE, SHIVALIK Apartment Panipat, Virat Apartment Lok Vihar, Jeevan Jyoti Apartment, Vardhman Rail Vihar Bank Vihar, Nav Yug Apartment, mp, gu, jd , District Centre Haryana, Ghalib Apartment, Shiv Mandir, L D GP HSG HARYANA-88, Rohtak, Block Painting, Block Printing man cell delhi men cell delhi man help in Delhi, Hand Embroidery 125 crpc at Rohini , Machine Embroidery man cell delhi men cell delhi man helps, Stiching & Household 125 crpc, Group Sec 24 hma, Full Course in Two Months, Summer Camp in Rohini, Chanakya Enclave, Meera Bagh, Meera Bagh Apartment A Block B Block, GH-14, GH-8, GH6, GH5,GH4, CSE Complex, Community Centre Central Market, Netaji Subhash Place, 498a, Written 498a, Conversation, Discussion in 498a & Role Plays., Group Discussions, 498a Forums, Summer Camps, Paschim Enclave, Bank Vihar, Rohini, Sector3 Rohini, Rohini VIII, Sec7 Rohini, all sectors of Rohini Haryana, Paschim Enclave, Sonepat Chowk, Pubjabi Bagh, Sangam Apartment, Vikas Apartment, WP, Nav Sena Apartment Rajasthan, Mourya Enclave, HD, SD, BU, Brij Vihar, mu, KU, JP, ND, Rajasthan, Rohit Kunj, M PTP Enclave, Tarun Enclave, Guru Nanak Apartment, Guru Harkishan Nagar, Guru Harkrishan Enclave Haryana Sonepat Rohtak Delhi 34 63, Sharda Apartment , Outer Ring Road, ST XAVIERS APTT, Caw cell Panipat, Punjab, Deepali Chowk, C Block Bus Stand, TU, SU, KU, Vidya Vihar, Dhudiyal Apartment, Rajasthali, Sharda Niketan, LP C Block Rajasthan, Sainik Vihar, shree Nagar, Shakur Basti, Vishal Complex, Dipni Apartment, Balaji Plaza Sainik Vihar, Apra North Ex Plaza Rajasthan, ED AU Neelambar Apartment, Model Apartment Sant Haryana, Triveni Apartment, Harit Niketan, Gujrat Apartment, Dera Gazi Khan Sainik Vihar, KH Zone H4/5 Haryana, Kasturba Apartment, Neelkanth Plaza, jd raja enclave, Jai Shiva Apartment, Aminabad Apartment, Jeewan Anand Aptt, Deepali Ek Jot Apartment, Sahyog Apartment, Rang Mahal Apartment, Parijat Apartment, Tarun Enclave, Krish Jyoti Apartment, Ashiana Chowk, Ashiana Apartment. SEARCH Need Find Get Available Wanted Best Charge sheet Subject Group Individual Private man cell delhi men cell delhi man help for all needs in Rohini Haryana, West Delhi & North Delhi. Delhi Educated man cell delhi men cell delhi man helps only contact us for Registration for all areas/levels, subjects, localities in Delhi., Hamdard Goodwill SAraswati Enclave, Tulsi Agarwal Plaza, Vinoba kunj, Green Valley Apptts, Shivam Canal View Apt, Rohini Sec9 & Home man cell delhi men cell delhi man helps in Sector 13 Rohini. HARYANA man cell delhi men cell delhi man help also arranges Group Interim arguments/Sec 24 hma for All levels for Spoken 498A DOWRY PROHIBITION ACT man cell delhi men cell delhi man help in ROHINI & HARYANA.Find Look Want Need get seach Search seeking seek looking for a man cell delhi men cell delhi man help man cell delhi men cell delhi man helps interim argument maintenance Holidays Homework Help & Crash Course Summer Vacations in Rohini, Haryana, Uttar Pradesh, Ludhiana, Rohtak Voice Training Spoken 498A Tests & 498a Conversation Call Centre 498a Dowry prohibition act Course Anysubject Any Subject All Subjects man cell delhi men cell delhi man helps maintenance man cell delhi men cell delhi man help interim argument man cell delhi men cell delhi man helping 498a man cell delhi men cell delhi man help 498A DOWRY PROHIBITION ACT man cell delhi men cell delhi man help in ROHINI HARYANA school teachers Rajasthan Personal man cell delhi men cell delhi man help can wife withdraw 498a after chargesheet is filed how to find if case is registered queshing of fir certified copies of public documents adminisbility how to prosecute an impersonator false notices by advocate urgent advise required under section 354 a(sc st act) irrelevant cases cited by lawyers in defence in trials Whether parties required to give the copies of cases cited time barred agreement limitations act law of limitation specific relief under 498a dv case withdrawal - need help 498a and dv ac how to transfer case from one state to other complaint against public prosecutor marraige evidence ipc section applied for entering to home for criminal activity my father misused my cheque any relief available under the law fir not registered by police cheating case public servant ipc 380 theft case summons issued but the accused about to leave the city fraud cash withdrawls from icici debit card 498a and dvc my bank account freeze by cyber crime cell cancellation of hall booking marriage cancelled relief to bride groom under matrimonial laws or relevant laws for the time being in force urgent advice needed on cr p c 91 dismissal in 498a/406 case quashing fir 498a all women police station nanakpura moti bagh can accused get chance to quash the fir bombay high court : convict of 5 yr term given interim bail of 2 days spy software hacking can i file a police complaint against my wife can a son sue his mother under specific relief act about evidence act quash 498a moving high court without order copy of session court just certified copy applied status attached dowry and violence case absconders bail defence quash 498a mobile phone - theft recovery - hyderabad police/court property fraud any new rulling on cheque after dasrath roop singh rathore judgment can high court quash chargesheet on 4month delay fir appeal against the order of high court for acquittal auction of seized vehicles by the police motor vehicles act sec 304 and sec 304a case on order stage can perjury be filed 498a,41a,41b reasons sufficient? restoration of a case u/s 138 n. i. act remedy for a case u/s 138 N. I. Act. - dismissed for default rti - chennai police theft case- will this help rti on rto for documents verification cheating case against house owner loan issue absconders bail proclaimed offender jumping of bail tampering with witnesses or tampering with evidences audio conversation recording sample petition for defamation 499 500 filing under ipc 211 r/w 191 ipc falso 498a helpline for men delhi helpline for men trapped in false cases false dowry harassment cases by wives helpline for men victims of wife atrocities need help in filing perjury illegal phone tapping-action against the wrong doer sections ipc crpc nia case against partnership firm -cross examination issue optimization problem feasibility study monte carlo simulation limitation to file a defamation suit stealing the govt record personal information car accident reported later velidity in court of law summon a document 91 cr.p.c. aquitted from 498a defamation malicious prosection criminal defamation cases against wife 498a, 503,506,406,dv34, 156-3,323 threat of killing procedure for appeal in session court jaipur against cheque how to proceed after sc rulling supreme court ruling no automatic arrests in 498a time limit to file case police - action on a theft case cheque bounce if no proof in pw stage, is de still required plaintiff witness defence evidence plaintiff evidence 498a quashing time limit for criminal case evidence at the time of discharge application cheque bounce - court fees - maharastra filing complaint by govt employee beating and harassment by semi govt staff 498a registerd on me 2011 not yet chargesheeted What n where can be done man turns tables on wife's rape charge What cases on wife if 406 aquittal besides defamation steps to be followed in 156(3) passport plz save my life loc issued look out circular issued against nri any reliefs best lawyer in delhi bounced cheque quashing for 498a any advocate available from pune for matrimonial litigations cibil report case on sbi bank aAppeal in state case civil report criminal intent malicious prosecution assistant regisrar vigilance registrar vigilance of high court 498a dp 3&4-charge sheet filing a case againts a person in ap from tamilnadu 354 a quash cheque bounce criminal intent how to prove bad loan - cheque bounce maintainability of petition u/s 242 crpc illegal detention of vehicle charge sheet not filed from 2 yrs 313 question for 498a screen shots as evidence exemption permanent exemption temporary exemption from personal appearance u/s 317 u/s 205 498a evidence getting my share of money from my late father's savings builder unable to give building permission money extortion not yet returned money given through cheque trial in court - examination in chief adultery husband consent girl and lover went missing private complaint ncr court private complaint corruption in court how to handle corrupt staff of court how to avoid residential rights for my wife avoiding rtr in dv case dometic violence stay petition private complaint any law which prohibits dilly dallying delaying single complaint for two dishonoured cheques crpc 482 in high court crime arbitration pocso act 2013 nirbhaya scandal hc stay- interpretation claim petition format caveat on property by husband on wife's property my wife is not showing up for dv case how to dismiss get the dv case dismissed due to non presence of wife members threatening admin of a website si denied filing fir in criminal intidimation can money taken in account be termed as dowry complained about corrupt behavior of reader in ghaziabad court false rape accusation by women rohtak sisters rohtak bravehearts false story of harassment by rohtak sisters Witness mischievously saying i dont remember implications self incrimination not allowed under the law anyone cant be ordered to give evidence against his own self had lent 4lacs for business, but not received back the money constable (police) harassed bribe graft corruption acb anti corruption branch can i chat with someone under false id to collect evidence cyber laws ip address issues waybackmachine way back machine to check past intelligence bureau intellectual property rights ipr cheque bounce case in uae marriage gifts a prima facie evidence under dowry prohibition act 1961 pending cases in indian courts for years false fir u/s 354 by tenant's wife on landlord land mafia divorce mafia how to bring nri husband to india from uk can rape charge be filed after 2 years? help please ab anticipatory bail u/s 438 recovery of money lent court fees for cheque bounce case two wheeler identity theft high court 482 process repeated police harrasment- fake jewel theft police submitting new docs during trail of 498a police falsely implicated in arms case by police section 300 of crpc and article 20(2) of constitution Want to understand how to file defamation case best criminal defense law firm delhi evidence for 498a, 376, or even eve teasing in public summons in 138 ni act criminal complaint Wrongly accused in murder case perjury against police contempt against police Wife filled application for non balable warrant nbw in cheque bounce non bailable warrant issues application for speedy trial in trial court 21-b hindu marriage act 1955 speedy trial expeditious trial right guaranteed under constitution of india can a citizen (complainant) contest his own criminal case in person pc act 1988 false 498a Whistleblower/paid a bribe 498a, passport, visa and foreign travel 498a case pending for admission serving summons to family members in criminal matters munadi summon returned is deemed equal to summons served is it right time to file perjury false 498a, witness not coming to court is consensual oral sex with a girl friend considered a crime theft by a girl friend seeking guidline u/s 205 searching advocate for jodhpur Video sent to a girl doing yoga amount to section 354 sub section ? blackmailed by a lady who made video of husband compromising situation with him extorting money on regular basis action on police action against police atrocities inhuman treatment by police misuse of power with mala fide intention by rpo-chandigarh delhi malafide intention of sister of wife diverted wife wife filed false cases on behest of mother sister & on diversion by her dissident relatives suffering from cc case, please give me a suggestion not cooperating other party to withdraw money from joint a/c civil remedy legal remedy available to victim plaintiff 498a quashed, case still pending, passport renewal one/two instances of assault don't make cruelty case: delhi court latest ruling of 2015 says that if few instances of harassment are there then this matter does not come under 498a dowry protection domestic violence & other similar reliefs asked prayed by the wife no need party when advocate present in case u/s 107/116 crpc appearance of party is mandatory high court order- license suspension defending 498a distinction between section 451 and 457 crpc search an advocate for internship law intern Where will bail granted if case filed in two states two or more states involved two complaints by same wife against same husband with different allegations mental cruelty corrupt behavior of reader reported to judge but no action by judge family court principle judge not intervening the matter false 498a arrest without dcp's approval habeas corpus: non speaking order in slp special leave petition rules supreme court legal services authority website delhi legal services authority official web portal spuvac nanakpura cwc harassment cheating-loan in 3-4% per year need urgent lawyer for 498a/313/406/506 civil relief prayed by wife no medicals records attached ipc 377 addition into chargesheet how to handle rcr filed by 498a fraud lady wants to come back to file 304b Pitampura Deepali private man cell delhi men cell delhi man help E-rti on policeing Ludhiana Uttar Pradesh Punjabi Bagh Club charge sheet online man cell delhi men cell delhi man help rti on police teach study voice coach revise study onlinecoach tuter tutour tuitor math mathematics maths 498a science biology accounting economics, computing, punjabi 498a dowry prohibition act interim maintenance 498a conversation skills improvement course public dowry prohibition act confidence building interim argument tuting man cell delhi men cell delhi man helping man cell delhi men cell delhi man helps man cell delhi men cell delhi man help, tutours, maintenances, academic, levels, pre-school, primary, private man cell delhi men cell delhi man help home man cell delhi men cell delhi man help personal man cell delhi men cell delhi man help, private man cell delhi men cell delhi man helps, homeschool, education, top man cell delhi men cell delhi man help schoolwork homework internet, cheap home man cell delhi men cell delhi man help public dowry prohibition act 498a as a foreign rti on court IELTS HARYANA man cell delhi men cell delhi man helpS provides Home man cell delhi men cell delhi man helps maintenance man cell delhi men cell delhi man help interim argument man cell delhi men cell delhi man helping charge sheets Rti on police home man cell delhi men cell delhi man helps Home man cell delhi men cell delhi man help Rti on court school teachers voice coach private man cell delhi men cell delhi man help Personal man cell delhi men cell delhi man help for All 125 crpc I,II,III, IV,V,VI, vII,VIII,IX, X Spl. For Rohini, Haryana, Rohtak, Rajasthan, Punjab, Ludhiana, Uttar Pradesh, Panipat, Domestic violence act, Punjabi Bagh Club 498a man cell delhi men cell delhi man helps, Meera Bagh, Bhera Enclave, Sonepat, Engineers Enclave, SFS Flats Tarun Enclave, Panipat, Punjab, Wazir Pur, Shopping Centre, Shivaji Market, Green Apartment, GreenView Apartment, Green Lake Apartment, Handtax evsion petition Improvement, Horti culture, Fishery Culture, Homework Help, Holidays Homework Help in Rohini, Haryana, Maurya Enclave, Vidya Vihar, Caw cell, Domestic violence act, Rajasthan, Rohini, Haryana Block FU,ND, KP, MP, RP, CD, CU, Rajasthan Apartment, Aptt, Ashok vihar, Shri Nagar, Sainik Vihar, Pitampura, Sector VIII 8 Rohini, Sec3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 24, All Sectors of Rohini 498a man cell delhi men cell delhi man help for 498a Dowry prohibition act, Paschim Enclave, Rohini Sector 1,2,3,4, 5.6.7,8 III,VII, VIII, IX, XI, XIII documents admitted but not exhibited, exhibiting of documents, ipc 307 punishment type issues 204 of cr.p.c also 202 crpc need help with defending ipc 420 419 by husband receiving money in bank account and legal issue how to handle 8 months and cs not filed yet what to do case against cops false dowry case before marriage validity of 498a before marriage supreme court process time for 482 dismissal in hc dowry receipt on stamp paper cheque is receeived as a security with time binding cheque bounce case against wife sec 138 ni act time of notice and place of filing the case as of today police gunda raj up punjab haryana delhi forcing for resignation bounced cheque fir steps no action taken by police yet criminal intimidation by the police authoritiesio not cooperating travel abroad during magistrate custody io not investigation enquiry officer caw cell voluntary & reconciliatory mediation and counselling 498a how to start the fight ? Cheque return case status stridhan shtridan, sridhan shtridhan Sec 138 c of negotiable instrument act going abroad permission proclaimed offender nri caught in extortion gimmick appeal against order in case u/s. 420 of ipc false case u/s. 354, 354a, 354b 376/511 506 323. high court direction to police regarding bail sureties criminal complaint u/s 19(b) ep act 1986 merits based selection environment protection act violation complain registration authority delhi Want to know whether i can get relief or not under specific relief act 1963 law of limitations act 1955 standard of weights & mesaures act 1976 monopolies and restrictive trade practices act 1969 and subsequent amendment foreign exchange management act 1999 conservation of foreign exchange & prevention of smuggling act 1974 quashing of an fir u/s 376, 377 success rate high court with no dated allegation no specific allegations all wild allegations When is a time to file 340 (perjury) first available opportunity to file perjury cheating by gf how to handle girlfriend livein problem my live in partner not cooperating trying to file false cases due to another boyfriend from her homw town instigation diversion by her relatives filed false case on husband family due to instigation by her relatives can i get anticipatory bail before filing 498a case yes of course if anyone applies for anticipatory bail before filing FIR 498a when matter is in the court then he gets notice bail u/s 438 passport issues passport impounding of nri in 498a loc line of control letter of credit in export transactions export import policy fir not accepted, ddr filed. please help ddrs helps resolve conflicts delhi dispute resolution society need help for false case against wife how to file case on wife how to file criminal complaint against wife to counter false dowry harassment complaints u/s 498a & domestic violence granting bail for women with toddler child under ipc 420 pocos pocso child crme criminal lady with child gets bail perjury with only costs perjury revision u/s 341 filing case in sessions unaccounted money can not be recovered u/s138 of ni act right or wrong filled wrong information in affidavate in highcourt false case filed against me and entire family social stigma due to false cases social stigma criminal cases family culture married life matrimonial dispute sec 125 cr.p.c perjury validity wife doing job false crpc 125 filed by wife in family court conviction in crpc 125 interim maintenance police illegally detained and extorted money from family what to do fight against corrupt police officials signed document of dowry taken by wife s father from husband 498a and dvc divorce all filed by wife s family all at once corruption , crime , fraud , fake documents political links bureaucracy approach political vendetta judicial vendetta loopholes is indian police system helps them to take law in loopholes in law allow police to misuse law bank refuse to provide information granting bail for women with toddler child under ipc 420 validity and grounds bail rejection bail cancellation drama by police is post mortem report admissible in court india indian evidence act requesting advise on suit (civil services exam) civil suit advise civil suit library civil abbreviations in cognizable crime, can arrest be made without evidence what is non cognizable crime applicability ofnotice u/s 41a crpc guidelines disciplary action against the metropolitan magistrate contempt of court against the police for not abiding by arnesh kumar judgment of july 2014 324 ipc quashing quashing u/s 482 bhajan lal's judgment 498a 324 ipc querry in defamation police illegally detained extorted money from family(4hrs) illegal detention punitive detention preventive detention areas vulnerable to smuggling activities industrial law dhudiben dharamshi versus state of punjab criminal defamation versus civil defamation u/s 499 r/w 500 crpc 499 ipc 498-a lady not cooperating for cross examination clarification on private complaint getting call detail records of wife cell tower location how to do cross examination in 498a domestic violence & civil case role of public prosecutor in 498a cheque bounce case delhi What will be next action of the court contempt phone recording gadgets/ s/w to track wife wife mobile tracking software wife tracking software is 498a ab applicable for dv also fabricated documents forged documents court record tampering dad's cheque bounced -problem for son travel to doha qatar bought a stolen mobile phone unknowingly that it's stolen is no excuse ignorance of law is not an eucuse accident claim tribunal consumer protection act national consumer redressal forum pgportal. gov. in pgportal versus consumer awareness affectiveness un accounted money in sec 138 n i act is army court martial against principle of natural justice law of natural justice fundamental right to be heard law of equal opportunity cheating case against a bank representative and builder voice recording happens by chance excuse by police not maintainable in the eyes of law hence her allegations have no iota of truth in it & is liable to be rejeted with an exemplary cost spying and threaten to kill husband wife kills husband by mixing sleeping pills in drink wife does sex whole night then kills husband bank alibi t case aganst wife's uncle manager in bank branch joint account custody on line satus : 498a bank refuse to provide information is recording a voice an offence ex parte order in crpc 125 by wife biased judge perjury against judge perjury against metropolitan magistrate perjury mm u/s 191 r/w 193 ipc 340 crpc custody judgment 498a victim please help me in a 498a case complainant not appearing to court after compromise effectiveness of complaint against judge in supreme court clarification on filling private complaint rejection of plaint due to non-appearance by wife suit dismissal application regarding 120b criminal conspiracy criminal intent 498a/406/dp act case status divorce family courts act lawyers not allowed requesting advise on suit (civil services exam) avoiding of orders by link court defamation by my parents on my wife due tofalse 498a, no cs link mm metropolitan magistrate political vendetta judicial vendetta Wife burns man, 6 of his kin to death in tamil nadu shilpa reddy news of june 2015 in which she killed husband keshav reddy incest relationship with cousin brother foster brother honour killing of husband by wife's family honour killing of wife & husband in front of panchayat challenging summon in dv act ground not chargesheeted 498a daily orders cause list no cause of action dismissal of plaint cheating case When can family court recall its own order passed in 125 crpc order vii rule xi cpc order x civil procedure code Woman harashment cheque bounce - lawyer responsibility iIpc 338, 184 185 mv act under section 3 damage of public property act trespass cyber law in case of deleting contents in website by hosting bogus criminal writ is filed against senior woman aged 80 yr septuagenarian does cpc order xi rule12 is applicable in crpc 125 show cause notice by passport over old canceled case 498a wife fate of an 498a wife false 498a - bail at police station order after order 498a - accused presence during framing of charges complaint on circle inspector and submitted negative report funds transferred to friend through rtgs Jd proceeded against exparte and cas adjourned for filing marriage annulment due to false affidavit during registraton impotency adultary annulment irretrievable breakdown of marriage 498a doubts , help me fight my case party in person adultery u/s 497 ipc incest sapinda act allahabad high court landmark judgment on 498a of ipc 498a speed trial (suggestions required) contempt of court for saving job procedure of obtaining sanction for government officers contempt of court against the investigating officer perjury against an IO iO files fale affidavit in court case review bail grounds : 498a harrassment under section 498a and section 406 fake software company section 138 cheque bounce summons returned unaccepted What is the procedure for filling private complaint procedure to file a crpc 156 - tamilnadu ipc 337 can a cheating and emotional loss case be filed filing case due to refusal to marry by boyfriend domestic violence case filed by live in partner relationship with a married man by an unmarried woman is not adultery two similar complaints-one cross examination holding 2 passports fraud case against against me by my husband wife family of fraudsters permanent injunction on sold land caste certificate issue how to get added as complainant in fir sc/sc caste certificate atrocity charges agaisnt men helpline please reply urgent 498a filed on me & entire family litigation case against my ex wife for misuse of dowry 498a rti for matrimonial cases - 498a & others cheque bounce case anti dowry law to be made compoundable Whether a summon case can be processed under section 244 of non compounding cases 498a in hyderabad andgra pradesh filing mantenance case against wife u/s 24 hma rcr restitution of conjugal rights partition / legal stand of children physical custody interim custody final custody natural guardian hague committee recommendations bail condition granted due to misuse fight against misuse of 498a ipc file fir under section 182 and 211 ipc for false complaint how approach to court if police doesn't support property sold by innocent buyer whether liable under ipc 498a and 125 crpc need for advice - possibility of false allegations u/s 498a 498 false case filed by wife on innocent husband criminal conspiracy by police 498a filed twice in same name threatening of my wife section 420 for false compliant need help-accident lawsuit, 3 years, charge sheet not filed legal expenses 498a case how much quash and ab costs for false 498a best criminal lawyer best bail lawyer regular bail transit bail interim bail cs filed but not yet recieved it help to get passport for a 498a victim phone calls validity of forged photostat copy submitted as evidence chargesheet copy not yet provided to accused husband illegal arrest in noncognizable offence false complaint filed against me, for flat purchase token false statement before regional director how to prosecute an Army man in arms deal fake public prosecutor, private advocate not allowed by wife threatening by my former lawyer to disclose complaint to bar council rape alleged by an already married woman discharge petition u/s498a,307,406,506,343/4dpa published in regional newspaper by police is it a crime to record a phone call with spy software spying on wife is a crime or not under law in india, Wife is acessing interim maintainance in dv, Fir of false 498a against me, I need some legal advice, Wife works in usa but filed 498a on parents/sisters, Wife not coming for dvc case, Advise needed regarding a cheating case, Interim bail in 498a, Ipc 377, S. 397 crpc, 197 crpc sanction of government for prosectuion of judge or magistrate governor or president, Profile in matrimonial websites, How to put 420 on my inlaws, Fighting inlaws in false dowry case through rti, Foreign trip during 498a trial, Sc- st case, Fir quashing process and proofs, order in cause list of the high court, Quashing of fir u/s 354 , 354a, 354d and 506, Jurisdiction criminal law, Fragery and chetting case, Quashing false dv case, Protection from foisted/framed charges, Pocso act, 498a urget help, 498a - passport renewal, Query on 498a quash in hc, Charge sheet 60 days / 90 days, registrar vigilance, judicial vendetta, lego technical fallacy, judicial vengeance, judicial accountability, judicial transparency, judicial responsibility, judicial officers, judicial activism, contempt of court under section 15(2) high court, anguish, Complaint against Delhi High Court, Judicial Irresponsibility by Registrar Vigilance Delhi High Court &/ ors who otherwise had primary authority to handle such court record tampering (perjury done on perjury), Cheque bounce case filed and accused died after, Forgery in signature, Is it possible to get fir copy of 498a (false) on my family, Police filed final report with out my notice, Help in filing private criminal complaint, Passport suppression of information, Life threats on mobile, The miller cheating farmers, Teacher service, There is any process to attend court before final charge she, grounds raised in memo of appeal, how a common man can advance his argument before FAA. Hearing by FAA is not a ritual performed by the department with FAA and PIO on one side and the appellant as a scapegoat, judicial intimidation in the Delhi District Courts are not just functional but also fearless as this gives an appellant a feeling that these judicial officers are above the law, Criminal defamation, contempt of court by judge, Violation, Jwelery to husband at time of marriage, Economic offence wing, Rules of evidence-criminal trial, Regarding discharge petition - 498a, Disciplinary Action/ FIR/ Other Legal Action against all those which this Hon'ble CJI Supreme Court of India deems fit in the light of above facts & circumstances, RTI to Hon’ble Registrar Vigilance dated 16/07/2015, Postal Proof mentioned at bottom of A13, No Action by the Registrar Vigilance, Receiving by Hon’ble Registrar Vigilance of Delhi High Court wherein an officer enquired from me the purpose even after I told him that the matter is sub-judice but still he read each & every word, FAA Order which explicitly proved that none of my Written Arguments were taken into consideration, RTI to Hon’ble District Judge, Rohini Court, Delhi dated 16/07/2015, Judicial Intimidation or directed to appear under the RTI Act & in the contravention of RTI Act, 2005 without mentioning the say/ remarks/ reasons submitted by PIO under the RTI Act,2005 (mentioned in main part of complaint), False & Evasive Reply by PIO Concerned, Hon’ble FAA again wrote “directed to appear” against the basic spirit of the RTI Act,2005, Kindly supply me certified copy of all my submissions to registrar vigilance of Delhi High Court dated 14.09.2015, Kindly supply me the case no. allotted to this complaint, kindly supply me the name, designation of the two/three judges to whom this case/complaint has been allotted, Kindly supply the name, designation of all the judges of Delhi High Court concerned/related to this case no. in any manner, Kindly supply the certified copy of action taken report, Kindly supply the process to attend the hearing/s in this case no, Discharge petition, Power of attorney mis-use, Cheque given by fraud person which account closed, Ignoring non bailable warrant!! what will it cause, Is police at fault - 498a/406, Jurisdiction, technicality, Help needed for quashing of accident case under 304a from hc, Rti for look out circular, brutal assassination, It is humbly submitted that I have recently filed a complaint against Delhi High Court &/ ors to Hon’ble Chief Justice of India in relation to & arising out of court record tampering in the above numbered complaint & other issues thereof, That the Ld MM is working clearly in contravention of the principles of "good faith", That since the matter relates to false implication of an innocent involved in a matrimonial dispute in contempt of court for the very reason/ fact that he complained about court record tampering being done in the concerned Ld MM’s court & that such court record tampering had been arising out of present matter & for such matters only the High Court has the powers to decide as per my knowledge hence I have no other option but to approach the high court, defamatory :- The Hon’ble Ld MM Ms. Shefali Barnala Tandon made certain averments in the order dated 17-10-2015 which are patently defamatory, statements which, as per her own knowledge, are false. The said statements have tarnished the reputation of the undersigned and damaged his social standing and goodwill in society. These malicious, vexatious, false and incorrect statements were made with a sole motive to malign the undersigned and personal standing and image of the undersigned, and to cause him to suffer material and personal/mental injury and anguish thereto. The Ld MM Ms. Shefali Barnala Tandon having recorded in her order my written submissions in a highly modified & manipulated manner so as to infer a totally different meaning. This proofs that the purpose of such manipulation & defamatory modification of my written submission was to give a totally different inference whereas at one instance I even requested her to record my submissions verbatim emphasizing the term arising out of to be duly recorded as it has been directly arisen out of the present matter but she didn't, matrimonial dispute :- if the concerned Ld MM will get involved in personal targeting of those involved in matrimonial disputes before her then what justice will she be able to deliver to those involved in heinous crimes. Will she be able to handle those sensitive matters if this matrimonial dispute seems to be so important for her that on one hand she never gave opportunity for mediation between the married couple despite written requests by me (not being repeated for brevity but CD is attached for your kind perusal & certified copy of this application is on pdf file named DVC 002 [1.8.15] ENTIRE (1) at page number 75) & on the other hand she is targeting one of the party i.e., me. In this regard I would like to mention that mediation is a mandatory requirement as per law & providing pamphlet of mediation to the respondents is mandatory to be provided under law, Ghonsla Breaker :- This Ld MM has not just committed crime by defaming me by manipulating even my written statements & other wrongs explained in below paras but this Ld MM has also committed a sin under the eyes of god because she is acting as a ghonsla breaker by not providing opportunity of mediation to a couple. This brings shame not just to Indian judiciary but also for humanity & even though my eyes feel little wet while writing this line but still for the sake of my nation/ humanity/ Indian culture / family values it is necessary for someone to raise their voice for the benefit et al so that Indian culture & family values can be preserved for the future generations, not fit for mahila court :- In a mahila court we need someone as sensitive as Justice Shiv Narayan Dhingra because these are very sensitive matters & if a judicial officer practices either low temperament/ misandric mindset / personal targeting / non-sensitization / family breaking mindset / personal vengeance or vendetta then I am sorry to say that he/she is not fit at least for mahila court’s which require extreme patience/ temperament & sensitization to these matters, gender division/ gender gap :- matrimonial disputes are not being solved in the manner they should be & therefore there has increased/ widened the gap between the genders which needs to be checked on time so that we are able to give a better future for the toddlers. And if a Ld MM ranked responsible officer does not understand this sanctity then this may prove injurious to the familial health of our nation, my crime for which I was punished was merely the fact that I reported court record tampering being done in Ld MM’s court concerned. And after I reported this court record tampering through my application (not being repeated for brevity but CD is attached for your kind perusal & certified copy of this application is on pdf file named DVC 001 [11.8.14] ENTIRE [17.1.15] ENTIRE & [5.2.15] DC Affidavit (1) at page numbers 137 to 142) then again court record tampering was done because those submissions by me which reported court record tampering were partly removed (for your kind perusal within pdf file named DVC 002 [1.8.15] ENTIRE (1) at page numbers 74 it can be seen that other pages are partly removed from the file especially the page number 141 & 142 on pdf file named DVC 001 [11.8.14] ENTIRE [17.1.15] ENTIRE & [5.2.15] DC Affidavit (1) are removed which are of utmost significance because even certified copy of Domestic Incident Report at page number 69 of DVC 002 [1.8.15] ENTIRE (1) directly prove this) from court’s record & regarding that perjury on perjury i.e., court record tampering on court record tampering I already gave a written submission to Hon’ble Chief Justice of Delhi High Court & other concerned authorities dated 14/09/2015 but I am still waiting for an appropriate action. (annexed annexure A1 to annexure A35 and also the annexed CD for your kind perusal). Please note that:- the contents of the CD which I submitted on 14/09/2015 as discussed above has the same contents as the CD I am submitting today hence for the sake of brevity I request & I crave leave of this Hon’ble Court to kindly peruse this CD alongwith the annexure A1 to A35 in the interest of justice, Impugned/ Illegal/ Immoral/ Inhumane Order by Ld MM, arising out of :- the Ld MM has removed these words from order sheet to hide her own wrongdoings which we all know very well that arising out of is a technical term which clearly indicates that something has arisen out of but still even this part which I have given in writing has been deliberately removed by this Ld MM to deliberately bring out an altogether different interpretation (annexed annexure B1 for your kind perusal), being a law officer this Ld MM knows very well that &/ ors clearly indicates that there is every possibility that it might not be against Delhi High Court and might be just against the ors i.e., others. Hence there is every possibility of only other parties involved against whom I have made a complaint in Supreme Court & not the Delhi High Court but still this Ld MM even asked me whether her name is there or not within that complaint which is illegal on the part of this Ld MM especially if the matter is sub-judice & especially if the matter is related to court record tampering arising out of the present case matter under her disposal, humbly submitted, importance of first para :- this first para of the order sheet is of utmost relevance because this first para is called the introductory para & my representation (Annexed B1-B3 for your kind perusal) from which so many points were removed as explained in paras 1.1 to 1.6 above, and this in itself very clearly establishes that this Ld MM Ms. Shefali Barnala Tandon was pre-planned to counter attack on me for wrecking vengeance due to the RTI & First Appeal filed by me in relation to & arising out of court record tampering in the present matter under her disposal, watchdog not a bloodhound :- Indian Supreme Court warned of legal terrorism due to misuse of women laws and said, "The role of the investigating agencies and courts is that of a watchdog and not of a bloodhound." And therefore the conduct of Ld MM as visible from first para of order sheet itself r/w above paras with special emphasis to para, Cheque bounce / applicability of 420, Anti bail granted but dont want to appear, He objected to appear the private counsel in this private, 10 lakhs cheque bounce, Section 138, Adultery proof, Not taking finger print -police, Need urgent lawyer for 498a, Warrant/ samman, Appeal on dv, False 498a dv by my wife, 498a affidavit, Summon, Emails from incognito mode, False robbery case, Fraud 420, Plz suggest me, 498a quash before divorce?, Prevention of corruption act on retired public servant, section 52 of India Penal Code :- Section 52 of Indian Penal Code defines “Good faith” as "Nothing is said to be done or believed in "good faith" which is done or believed without due care and attention." Here since even my half page application itself has been misinterpreted r/w para, vengeance :- It is the right and duty of every citizen to make a complaint against any judicial officer/ authority for court record tampering &/or misdemeanor &/or favoritism &/or nepotism and /or corruption. There is “in house mechanism” to receive and consider such complaints and take action in appropriate cases, She thus gave a message to people that any citizen who invokes “in house mechanism” against court record tampering arising out of her court shall be falsely implicated. She caused obstruction in flow of justice by manipulating even my written submissions as evident from the first para of order sheet r/w explanations in paras 1.1 to 1.10 above. This raises doubt in the minds of an Indian citizen & common man that if a judicial officer is so powerful in India that she can manipulate even the written submissions made before her then what is the guarantee that such a judicial officer will not manipulate your oral submissions. Such an act of manipulating even the written submissions this Ld MM has given a strong message to the society that she is above law, unbecoming of a judicial officer :- the way my written submission (Annexed B1-B3 for your kind perusal) was misinterpreted/ manipulated even in the introductory para of impugned order sheet dated 17/10/2015 itself thereby distortion of all important points therein as mentioned within paras 1.1 to 1.11 above, this proofs that this act is not just illegal but also unethical & unbecoming of a judicial officer hence an appropriate exemplary action needs to be taken to protect the sanctity of Indian judiciary, independece of judiciary :- The word “Independence of Judiciary” is derived from the oath of office of a Judicial Officer which reads as under;- “That I will duly and faithfully and to the best of my ability, knowledge and judgment perform the duties of my office without fear, favour, affection or ill will and that I will uphold the Constitution and the Laws” Anyone violating his oath of office by being biased or partial is guilty of crime against ‘indepndence of Judiciary’. However over the period it has taken a perverse meaning saying that a Judge is independent of law / above law. In our democratic country, No one is above law. Nemo est supra legis, She punished me by writing in the order sheet a totally distorted picture of the real facts (& complete suppression of real facts) which is an absolute travesty of justice, order me to put copy of that letter on record for entirety :- the Ld MM was requested by me to order me to disclose that complete representation within this court if that is the correct legal procedure or to wait for the decision of Supreme Court as it concerns a matter related to & arising out of the above numbered complaint i.e., current case under her disposal but instead she extracted through mental torture & duress two terms from my mouth viz., officers & judicial officers & then went ahead to manipulate that as "Judges & Officers of High Court of Delhi" in the order sheet. Just see here that, I spoke only two terms viz., officers & then judicial officer when she intimidated me through mental torture & duress & she mentioned that by way of manipulating those two words in the way she desired, This will be proved when that representation to Supreme Court by me will surface before this Hon'ble Court as then it will be proved that what I meant by those two terms uttered by me and what were the contents of those parts which she was unable to extract out of my mouth by god’s grace. Please note that, if by mistake she would have succeeded to even extract those other names from my mouth through that mental torture & duress then she would have manipulated even more my statements. Hence, this manipulation of order sheet by this Ld MM is not just illegal but also unethical for the society we live in. Here it is pertinent to mention here that, even my written representation does not directly mention anywhere the terminology judges of High Court of Delhi then how can I say on inquiry that I have made complaint against Judges of High Court of Delhi. Hence such distorted second para in order sheet is nothing less than mockery of Law & Justice by this Ld MM, only conclusion could be drawn :- this is real travesty of justice when the officer who is given the job to find out the truth or to deliver justice conceals/ deliberately misinterprets/ manipulates &/ hides her own wrongs & draws false/ illegal/ unethical/ illogical/ wild / manipulated conclusions against those who come to justice before her. Such type of illegal/ unethical & manipulated conclusions demands disciplinary action against her read with paras 1.1 to 1.11 above as such an act is also contrary to the principles of good faith, time & again I have told the Ld MM that kindly read my income affidavit it says my income as 10,000/- per month & I am able to support my family but unable to bear the cost of lawyers. and when she told me about legal aid I told her madam my income is above the ceiling limit prescribed under legal aid but she turned deaf ears to my response every time & never suggested me any alternative method at any point of time. This can be verified by this Hon'ble Court by visiting the link http://dlsa.gov.in/legalaid.html# which reads as follows:- "The income-ceiling limit U/s 12(h) of the Legal Services Authority Act, 1987 has been enhanced to Rs. 50,000/- per annum to extend the benefits of the Act to more people, constitutional validity of judiciary selecting judiciary, on the other hand if the district court/ other authority suppresses such audio/video records makes any excuses like its can't be disclosed etc then that is the real mockery of justice when compared with most western countries where audio/ video recordings of court proceedings are fully functional to maintain accountable & transparent judiciary. Further, as recently NJAC has been scrapped giving way for collegium regarding appointment of judges thereby giving full fledged powers in the hands of the judiciary to select the judiciary (which is of course against our Indian Constitution which specifically says contrary to this. And also on the cardinal principle that no individual or a group should have absolute discretion or power in public administration). Now if the audio/video records of the court proceedings are not presented/ or are suppressed/ or are not allowed/ or are not considered etc then this will prove that on one hand contrary to the Indian constitution judiciary selects judiciary & when someone uses RTI Act'2005 then vengeance & vendetta becomes active against him & when he asks for audio/video recordings to be presented then records are manipulated/ suppressed/ not presented/ or other excuses are made. If this comes out to be the true scenario then this is not just the travesty of justice but also reminds us of living under the dictatorship of judiciary and if such is the scenario then why are we thronging the courts for years because if its simply in the hands of a Ld MM to decide the fate of a person then whats the purpose for asking written statements etc & why not decide the cases as per the wills & choices of a Ld MM, civil suit already pending regarding maintenance, As per Hon’ble Delhi High Court Domestic Violence Act 2005 does not give woman any additional right to claim maintenance from her husband. Under the act, the court of metropolitan magistrate (MM) has the power to grant maintenance and monetary relief on an interim basis in a fast track manner only in those cases where a woman has not exercised her right of claiming maintenance either under civil court or under section 125 of CrPC but the petitioner in the instant case has already invoked civil proceedings under Sec-24 Hindu Marriage Act so there is no need to decide interim maintenance but still this Ld MM has ignored this point which I already mentioned in my Written Statement & also in my reply to Sec-23 Interim Maintenance Application of petitioner. This Ld MM has ignored this point due to vengeance, CrPC 91 is an important application & therein I have asked very simple documents like:- since the petitioner has changed her name completely (without following a legally valid name change procedure & has also established separate domestic domicile/ residence for herself) hence I have asked a simple affidavit that she has not married after deserting her family & establishing a separate residence for her & legally a wife can get maintenance from only one husband, for initiating perjury proceedings against the complainant, copies of the same not supplied to petitioner till date (blatant lie), merely orders based on arguments without formal proof is against law :- As per Madhya Pradesh High Court in Madhusudan Bhardwaj & Ors vs Mamta Bhardwaj [ 2009 CRI. L. J. 3095 (Madhya Pradesh High Court ) (Gwalior Bench) :: 2009 (6) ABR (NOC) 1018 (M. P.)(Gwalior Bench) ] , "It is clear that the Act has been enacted for safeguarding the rights of a woman guaranteed under the Constitution and to provide protection against her victimization from domestic violence, interpretation of the provisions keeping this pious principle in mind is required . However, this principle cannot be accepted that in domestic violence always a woman is a victim or sufferer party. There may be cases where by misusing the sympathetic and favourable attitude of the society or law framers, male partners may be harassed and thereafter if Court of law gives a second push to the male partner, it may cause disorder in the society. In my considered opinion, at the time of administering such laws the Courts are required to be vigilant enough in deciding the dispute as to which part of the family is a victim of the domestic violence. In view of this also, passing orders merely on the basis of the documents, without their formal proof and upon hearing the arguments has not been permitted by the law and in judicial process it ought not to be permitted and leaning attitude towards one party of the lis is required to be avoided, It is necessary to reiterate aforesaid preliminary objection here which reads as follows:- "The Hon’ble court cannot create its own procedure for grant of relief if notice to respondent/husband is already issued & that respondents evidences are duly taken up by this Hon’ble Court & weighed & considered before passing any order/s under the Act. Reference be had from: Case Number: CRL.RP 815/2009 Judge(s): JAWAD RAHIM Petitioners: KRISHNAMURTHY NOOKULA Respondents: SAVITHA Y Date of Judgment: 9-Dec-2009 also available at link:- http://judgmenthck.kar.nic.in/judgments/bitstream/123456789/500665/2/CRLRP815-09-09-12-2009.pdf In Karnataka, this judgment has to be followed by all lower courts & this judgment reflects totally the LAW POINTS which can’t be ignored by any trial court of the country in cases which come under the purview of the said Act. This judgment is requested to be used as a precedent as it is of another High Court and some major extracts of the judgment read as follows:- “Section 28(1) clearly says that all proceedings under DV Act will be as per Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC). It also allows the court to lay down its own procedure but only for sub-section 23(2) which relates to grant of ex-parte order. So court cannot create its own procedure for grant of relief if notice to respondent/husband is already issued.” “The learned Magistrate issued prior notice to the petitioner herein and therefore the order comes within the ambit of sub-section (1) of Section 23 and it is not an ex-parte order referred to in sub-section (2) of Section 23. Once sub-section (2) is inapplicable then sub-section (1) of section 28 applies and necessary procedure prescribed by the Cr.P.C. is to be followed. The legal consequences are that the procedure prescribed by the Code of Criminal Procedure for trial of cases depending upon the nature of offence and punishment prescribed becomes applicable and that procedure has to be followed.” “Reference to section 28 is therefore necessary which provides for procedure. Section 28 reads thus: "28. Procedure – (1) Save as otherwise provided in this Act, all proceedings under sections 12, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 and 23 and offences under section 31 shall be governed by the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974). (2) Nothing in sub-section (1) shall prevent the court from laying down its own procedure for disposal of an application under section 12 or under sub-section (2) of section 23.” “The next question is, which of the procedures prescribed by the Code of Criminal Procedure for conduct of trial has to be applied to an enquiry under the Act. The Code prescribes different procedures for trial of summons cases and warrant cases. It depends on the nature of offence committed and the punishment prescribed by the Indian Penal Code or other law for the time being in force. In other words it is severity of the punishment which determines the procedure, whether it should be a summary trial to be conducted as a summons case or a trial applying the procedure for warrant cases depends upon the punishment prescribed. The provisions of Sections 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 and 23 of the Act make contravention of the orders passed under the Act punishable as an offence under Section 31 of the Act. To try a person for contravention of any of the orders passed (interim or final) under the provisions referred to above, Section 31 of the Act would apply. It postulates, a breach of protection order, or of an interim protection order, by the respondent shall be an offence under the Act and shall be punishable with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine which may extend to twenty thousand rupees, or with both. Thus, the punishment prescribed is imprisonment upto one year or fine upto Rs.20,000/-. Undoubtedly, the procedure prescribed for the summary trial, that is, summons case, has to be followed. Consequently, it was to be held that the procedure to conduct an enquiry for action under Sections 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 and 23 of the Act applicable is by the procedure prescribed by the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, (summons case) as the punishment prescribed under Section 31 is only up to one year. This is as envisaged under Section 28 of the Act, I o roles, Charged under ipc 279, Dying Declaration-Moot Problem, Invesigating officer is corrupt, IO not doing investigation properly, Fair Investigation, Regarding 498a quashing in scenario as explained, Abusive wife, inlaws torturing me to my limits;need help! Can someone pls provide me citation of sita ram v/s rastate, Need help with filing fir, Help required with submission of charge sheet for 498a, 406, False police complaint, Me and my family abused under 498-a, Police submitting negative report (crpc 202), 498a defamation, 498a fir quash, Criminal defense law, Cheque having only account no. in payee coulmn, Cheque dishonor case re-filed after 30days from its return, Check bounce - 420 case, Pre decided alternative option in cheque bounce case, 498a quashing : request for your valuable advice, Unised accesss to atm card, Website of lawyersclubindia contains malware., Need help in 138 nia, Benefits of quickly employing a criminal defense lawyer, Police supporting criminals land mafia-remedy?? Citation of hc or sc, Cyber crime 66a - identity theft, supreme court of india, 498a 125, Complaint given to cbi and rti response received, 498a process after ab anticipatory bail transit bail, station bail, interim bail, notice bail, bail specialist lawyer in delhi, Whether a petition for joint custody is maintainable in court, Need urgent help! Police arrest - can this be avoided - driving accident, 304b - chargesheet not filed even after 5 months, Rcr, false 498a visiting rights, About mact, Crpc 200, Speedy trial @ sec 21 (b) hindu marriage act 1955, E.s.p forgery, Two ration cards in uttatr pradesh, Immigration fraud/cheating, I need a good lawyer in nagpur or chhindwara for 498a case, Cheq return, Verbal allegations for 498a, Maintainance granted to qualified wife in dv case, Am i eligible for selection in upsc exam, Scribes on cheques, Domestic Violence Act, Passport issue, pwdva 2005 2006, restricting in flow of trade, unfair trade practices, unethical practices, What is illegal online bat sattebazi in india, False case on husband - forced abortion, 138 ni 420, Permission of govt before filing of challan, Stay on domestic violence filed after 498a, Filing defamation case against ex-wife, Offensive messages through e-mail, perjury on perjury :- That I gave a submission on 14/09/2015 to Chief Justice of Delhi High Court & also to Registrar Vigilance of high court & other relevant authorities regarding perjury on perjury i.e., court record tampering done on court record tampering arising out of present matter being discussed, nullity :- It is worthwhile to record the striking observation of Hon’ble SC in the case of A.V. PAPAYYA SASTRY & ORS versus Govt of A.P. & Ors – (2007) 4 SCC 221 – Now, it is well settled principle of law that if any judgment or order is obtained by Fraud, it cannot be said to be a judgment or order in law. Before three centuries, Chief Justice Edward Coke proclaimed; "Fraud avoids all judicial acts, ecclesiastical or temporal". It is thus settled proposition of law that a judgment, decree or order obtained by playing fraud on the Court, Tribunal or Authority is a nullity and non est in the eye of law. Such a judgment, decree or order by the first Court or by the final Court has to be treated as nullity by every Court, superior or inferior. It can be challenged in any Court, at any time, in appeal, revision, writ or even in collateral proceedings, solemn duty of the court to rectify the mistake :- In the case of State of Orissa v. Mamata Mohanty, (2011) 3 SCC 436, the Apex Court observed as saying that once the court comes to the conclusion that a wrong order has been passed, it becomes the solemn duty of the court to rectify the mistake rather than perpetuate the same, (2011) 3 SCC 436. It is therefore humbly requested before this Hon’ble Court to issue directions to nullify this order dated, inherent powers of high court :- I would like to remind this Hon’ble court about the inherent powers of the High Court as below:- In Raghubir Saran versus State of Bihar– “The Courts exist not only for securing obedience to law of the land but also for securing ends of justice in its widest sense. All Courts, including the HC can exercise such powers as the law of the land confers upon them as well as such inherent powers to do justice as are preserved expressly or are not taken away by a Statute. It is necessary to remember that courts are established to do justice, even though High Court is subordinate to Supreme Court :- Every practice of court must find its ultimate justification in the interest of justice. Every Court possesses the power to do justice. Absence of conferment of powers on subordinate courts does not change this basic and fundamental principle which is inbuilt in every civilized system of law. The primary duty of the court is to see that truth is arrived at, In The State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Mohammad Nooh [1958 SCR 595] Vivian Bose, J. said that justice should be done in a common sense point of view stating: "I see no reason why any narrow or ultra technical restrictions should be placed on them. Justice should, in my opinion be administered in our courts in a common sense liberal way and be broad based on human values rather than on narrow and restricted considerations hedged round with hair-splitting technicalities, doctrine of fraud :- In the case of S P Chengalverau versus Jagannath – (1994) 1 SCC 1, the Hon’ble SC had the occasion to coin the doctrine of fraud, Allowing the appeal, setting aside the judgment of the High Court and describing the observations of the High Court as 'wholly perverse', Kuldip Singh, J. stated: "The courts of law are meant for imparting justice between the parties. One who comes to the court, must come with clean-hands. We are constrained to say that more often than not, process of the court is being abused. Property-grabbers, tax- evaders, bank-loan- dodgers and other unscrupulous persons from all walks of life find the court - process a convenient lever to retain the illegal-gains indefinitely. We have no hesitation to say that a person, whose case is based on falsehood, has no right to approach the court. He can be summarily thrown out at any stage of the litigation" (emphasis supplied), perverse order :- The perversity of the order implies – The Court ignored the relevant provision of law; and / or The Court ignored the material facts and evidences which were on record; The Court considered and emphasized upon irrelevant facts in its Order, In the case of Parrys (Cal) Employees Union versus Parrys and Co – AIR 1966 Cal 31, 42 – it is observed as – perverse finding means which is not only against the weight of the evidence but is altogether against the evidence itself. In the case of Narayanagowde versus Girijamma – AIR 1977 Kar 58, 60, it is observed as – an Order which is made in conscious violation of pleadings and law is a perverse Order, Lawyer is not giving copy of 498a ab papers! is it okay? Best criminal defense lawyer, Rti-fir copy received, Cheque as security, Please advise, Will 498a win affect to win crpc 125 pending in hc, Blank cheques amounts withdrawn, Mutual 498a, QUASHING OF CHARGE SHEET IN A CRIMINAL CASE, Impact of verdict on 66-a it act, Advise fir u/s ipc 420,506, Whether prosecution has the right to cross examine the accused, Whether the magistrate can recall or set aside his own order, How many bail bonds can a person sign for the same accused, Section 145 cr. p. c, Application for criminal court noc for passport of accused, Sc strikes down ‘draconian’ section 66a, 498a woman issued arrest warrant from court, Forceful removal of tenant's belongings from flat, Transfer of case(inter-state), Wife has filed 498a after the 6 yrs. of separation, Exibits at judgement stage, Bank transaction statements of wife, Ch of 3rd person-138 nia in discharge of legal liability, Status of shareholder, Can chief be different and additional from petition, Police verification for upsc (urgent), Forgery, Hearing of misc. petitions before the main case date, Mcd jurisdiction, Cheating our poor peoples, How to file caveat with district magistrate? Regarding superdari, Sections 138 1nd 139 ni act, False victim of ipc 498a, 304(b), 306, Section 151 of cpc, 420 and 120 b doest this attract pls confirm, Authenticity of data or legal identity of data on a website, Can wife leave the country after accusing us of 498 and dv, Quashing of accdent case under 304a, After 498a, can wife filled separate case of ipc 406? Forgery on ex wife, Protection of my life,chetting ,money land ring,warnings kill, Sc on sec.138, Email accounts hacked. need help!!! Complaint to acb (anti-corruption bureau) against wife, Debit card fraud happened with my icici bank chip debit card, Resposting thread : how to get a zero fir transfferd, 498a - dp act & 306 ipc, Cheque bounce due to litigation in property, L1 or h1b visa processing with pending criminal case, How to return fil car, Help! Ipc section 332, Can i face fir on this fb post, Hc/sc judgements required for ipc 279 case, cyber crime nehru p;lace address phone delhi trai cmpaint against vodafone airtel, Repudiation of claim, Ip based online agreement, intellectual property rights, written arguments two commercial shops, shaadi com id, fake matrimonial website profile, 138 nia accused tenders documents during ce of complainant, Is domestic violence transferable via supreme court, How many of you are planning to fight your cases in-person, Harassment by filling 138 case, Signature forgery, Burden of proof regarding undated cheque, Cheating case with injunction order, Statement of accused under section 164 cr.p.c, Fake case u/s 354 ,509,506 ,34, Post cheque bounce, Good Lawyers Needed - False 498a, Private complaint u/s 420,406,506,r/s34, No quashing first until divorce is finalized: hc, Which crpc 239 or 482 is good to go in 498a,406,34 and 3/4, I am taken hand lone (finance) agents my property, Cyber act and defamation, Please help urgent, Please guide 498a burden of proof in general allegations, Death of old mother by locking her in house, Assailants charged simple bailable offence, in house mechanism, in house complaint against a judicial officer, Forged photograph filed in 125 crpc case. what next? Booked under drunken driving and wants to know the formality, Application format to get court order !!! Car accident case - need assistance or suggestions (urgent), Exemption in session court after discharge application, Procedure to compromise before the chargesheet is filed, Legal notice may return as door locked.. intimation served, Hostile victim who is witness as well, Tresspassing, Information on ipc sec 279/337, Crpc 202 police inquiry development, Drunk drive under ipc 279 in kerala? Legal query on criminal defamation, If witness doesn't show up in the court, After aquital from 498a again opp file 498a, Rti before 498a chargesheet, 498a anticipatory bail rejected in hc, Need information, Chargesheet not filed yet u/s 354,354a 354d, Appearing in cri appeal agnst acquittal b4 session court, Police inquiry report, Cracking porous channel of passage of jp-hc-s hearing notice, 498 a, Friend turn foe 4 money, Forged certificate given by a person, Accused for misappropriation of funds by miscreants in chs, Lawyer doing criminal activity, Presumption of dowry death between 6 and 7 years of marriage, Harassment by repeated phone calls/unized entry, Domestic violence case, Defamation suit (different states), Rules and punishment, District general pleader misusing his office, what to do? nilesh ojha case bhabha atomic research defamation CAW Cell guidelines, Crimnal appeal against conviction, appellant seeking adjournment, Registered pvtltd co, entered into partnership fraud? 498a, surrender before court and bail, surrender, absconder, absconding, proclaimed offender, To what other mail-id,in lakhanau,i shd.take up lr.,below? Filing rti - how to find the pio, public information officer, Kindly issue suitable directions to nullify this order sheet or to declare this order dated, Kindly issue directions to initiate proceedings against court record tampering arising out of the present case matter in the light of above facts & circumstances, Kindly issue directions to decide perjury first in the interest of justice syed nazim hussain allahabad high court 461, rohtak sisters, 200 page chargesheet against sisters, false implication, Kindly issue suitable directions to provide me protection from vendetta in the light of above facts & circumstances & thereby to call for the audio/ video records from Rohini District Courts to check the veracity as these are the only records which can't be bribed or manipulated, stay application, stay on dv, stay on domestic violance case, kindly issue directions regarding dismissal of the concerned complaint under PWDVA 2005 in the light of court record tampering, Kindly issue directions to provide stay on interim maintenance application & arguments scheduled for the date, unethical order sheet, recall the order, power of the magistrate to recall the order, Kindly issue such an exemplary orders like disciplinary action or other legal action against this Ld MM which also becomes as a reference to be used by general public of Delhi so that not just the unethical practices but also the court record tampering in Delhi District Courts come to a halt & which will instill & inspire confidence in general litigants mind, Kindly take care of interest of the general public at large & thereby if there are some issues which can be handled only by Supreme Court or other authorities especially related to calling of audio/video records of proceedings from the District Court or rules thereof, NJAC & judiciary selecting judiciary issues, or any other issues which your esteemed authority feels come under other authority then kindly send only those parts to other authorities as this Hon’ble Court deems fit & your esteemed authority is requested immediate attention & to invoke your inherent powers as vested in your esteemed authority towards nullifying the order &/or other legal action, This illegal order has put my life & personal liberty at stake which needs to be corrected by passing relevant exemplary orders in exigency in the interest of justice & is hereby prayed as the matter concerns life & personal liberty of the undersigned which is also guaranteed vide Constitution of India, Voice recording, Defence in sec 138 nia, How can quash false DV case, forensic expert, CD forensic, When to file defamation case? Jurisdiction in fraud cases, Husband wife audio recording as evidence, Withdrawn of 304(b) case, For beconing party in criminal case, Section 2(4)(iii) section 8 in bankers book evidence act, False 304(b) sc/st act, evidence act section 76, specific performance act 1963, workmen compensation act, land rti, landmark judgment dowry laws, landmark bail application, voluminous domestic violence case written statement WS, OPEN book ws, written argument to take care of her parental property, False 498a, Fake caste certificate...help needed, Please help me in 138 ni lower court judgement, Re-investigation, Writ petition pending on high court please help me, bail challenge, bail cancellation, protest order, proitest application, self recusal by magistrate, unethical practices happened within the same court regarding which I have submitted a representation to Hon’ble Chief Justice of Delhi High Court. Copy of this representation has been annexed for your kind perusal, Can a case filed under section 133 crpc restored? 156(3) r/w 200 crpc, International stalking, Waiver for cooling period, 354 a, 354 b, 354 c, 354 d, 376, 377, pocso, atur chatur, Dv, domestic violence, Cheque and promissory note amt differ, Police refused to take fir, 498a query (urgent), What happend if again register fir against person get bail, Car accident case - URGENT advise needed, Cruelty u/s 13(1)(i-a), divorce based on cruelty, Revoke the stalled court proceedings, section 10 CPC, civil procedure code, Man beats up a school van driver, what charges can be filed? Section 102 cr.p.c, Will hc,jaipur-s notice,already@lko reach res.inlko,in7days? Filing perjury / defamation case, Household articles will be considered as dowry? Defamation under ipc 499/500, Case u/s 167 ipc, Encountered a problem that after false 498a complain and fir, Jurisdiction of criminal case, Cheque bounce case filing in court, Travel to nepal, Incident of accident between bike and car, Section i 138, Praying4god-s help in dhamayan in raj.courts@ajmerjaipur !! Can exparte divorce save me from pending 498a case, What cyber cell will ask to file a complaint about email id, Praying for end2twin judicial mockeries in jatayu-s dhamayan, Sentence for helping a murderer flee, Sec. 319 crpc, Contradiction in evidence, Need updated decission of hc allahabad !! urgent, Interim maintenance order under section 125, How much jail sentence ????? 498a and charges, Guidance sought B-Report, fINAL REPORT CHALLAN SUBMTTED but copy not given to accused, Procedure to file case against cheque bounce, 138 nia-post dasrath roop singh decision, How to obtain court certified copies? Procedure for closure of fir, How to get clarification from judge on the delivered order, Case u/s 167 ipc, 138 ni act clarification, Reinvestigation application given to judge, False Cheque Bounce Case, How can i prove my gold is with in laws, Absence on one hearing, Is self protection by biting on finger is charged under 326, Can 326 - compromise if both side agree, Transfer of domestic viloence case from nashik to mumbai, Serving of summons in the court room 138 nia matter, Private audio recording, Transferring of dv case from nashik to mumbai court, Can io punished for unnecessary filling of cs, 498a procedure in tamilnadu, want a best criminal lawyer in ahmedabad, Gujarat, compounding andhra pradesh 498a, hyderabad dowry harassment cases, Criminal case and eligibility for civil services, Ilegal bank statemet, Columns in chargesheet 489a, False (ncr) against me, Framing of charges in 498a, No reply from municipality after a notice issued by lawyer, Require junior lawyers in mumbai and ahemdabad, Fir filed but police not taking acting, Evidence of adultery, adultery incest sapinda adulteryincest.blogspot.com, Convicted for 5 years under dp act 3 and 4, Drunk driving, dp3 complaint u/s 156(3) crpc r/w 200 IPC, 52 ipc good faith prosecution of judges, prosecution of magistrate requires previous sanction from state government where government means governor or president, Dowry case witness, All respondents/acussed to be present, Right to residence in pwdva, Cheque bounce - case filed - how to defend, Can a case of perjury filed? Miscarriage, abortion, female foeticide medical council, Cheated with insurance money for personal loan, abortion u/s 313, abortion female foeticide u/s 312 ipc, Passport, Get a passport if a case already lodged against me, Filing 354 case urgent, Court attend before charge sheet and arrest warrant, Complaint to executive magistrate delhi, Withdrawal of criminal cases, Please advise, 138 nia-summoning document in a revision against cognizance, 498a - false case acquittal order? Can an advocate be punished for promoting false cases? 498 - a and mediation, Criminal, How to find property information, INTERIM BAIL, Quashing of fir 376, Eye witnessess in wildlife poaching cases, How to execute nb warrent, Acceptance during bail and denial during trial 376 case, What is a chargesheet, Bigamy, uniform civil code for muslims, polyandry, Need relevant citation for 498 dowry case, 50 lakhs guarantee by easy 498a, Legal notice after 4 years for sale objection, Transfer of case from one state to another, Email as evidence, What offense applicable? 138 chq transfer cases, 138 ni act transfer case, It act, Information technology act, Query about police enquiry (mode of communication), Court attendance after anticipatory bail for 498a, Father debits to son.. is it possible??? Who is eligible to file a revision petition, Magistrate passed false order can i file petition again, Show cause notice, Section 504, Please help very urgent, Withdrawal of All Mics. Petitions in return for speedy trial order, False 498a by wife as a counter burst of divorce summon, Arrest warrant issued without summons being served, Accused were removed, miscellaneous petitions, from cs, but still was issued summons, Fake signature in elelction nomination form, Separated wife withdraw amount, Bail orders needed !!!! Dasti of order, Help needed to file perjury in acjm court, False harijan act(3[1][10]) case with 451,294,506b, 34 ipc, Help required in false 498a and dp act sec 34, criminal conspiracy video recording, Do i need to pay to get a copy of FIR while applying for AB? 498a case, Verification of birth certificate, Dvc stay grounds, Does cheque bounce case exist after the full amount is paid? ? Red corner notice for personal laon default, What is what is recall w/a, if any. under surrender slip, Contempt of court in criminal s.l.p, Documentary evidence, False and fabricated 498-a, 323, 506 & 3/4 d.p act, Suicide! S.340 application, Criminal case against bank, Am i rightjustified in communication below, to my advocate at ajmer, Please guide, How long can a murder case be filed after date of death, 452 ipc, Acquittal in ipc 376, Forgery, How to divorce, Blank cheque validity, Fir issue, Passport made on fake documents, Can a.p.p. file an application in highcourt as a respondent, Is dp3, dp4 are compundable? Need immediate suggestion and help, Legality of signature by non-issued, Honourable acquittal, 138 case between husband and wife but both separated, Can ajmer court be fiddling,when i have taken case to hc? Filthy language -498a, Second fir on same fact after first was quashed by hc, Sanction for prosecution against bank manager, How to deal with false istridhan list in a dowryless marriage, Proof for dowry prohibition act sec 3 4, How to proceed on this theft case, Inquiry against cognizance, Civil defamation and criminal defamation, Evidentiary value of video recording in criminal case, Complaint sent to sp and dsp on women ps circle inspector, Adel landmarks - no land but allotment of flats made, Nia-complainant not willing to proceed against 1 partner, 138 chq transfer cases, Summons appearance in court, Electricity thief, Statemnt recorded under section 161 is different with statement, Compoundable Offence, Theft case in pune - need suggestion, Female phd students being harassed and threatened, Online complaint - chennai police, Anticipatory bail from other state and fir in another state, 498a, 406 and 323, Need suggestions, Appeal
man's right to disclaim fatherhood would be analogous to a woman's right to abortion rests upon a false analogy, Suicide, Gender differences in suicide, Men's rights portal, Social movements portal, Fathers' rights movement by country, Save Indian Family (SIF), Men's studies, Masculism, Feminism, Misandry, Sexism, A Voice for Men, National Coalition for Men, Paternal rights and abortion, Reverse discrimination, The Good Men Project, Women's rights, Women and children first, Fatherhood Politics in the United States: Masculinity, Sexuality, Race, and Marriage, cases of perceived discrimination make up the men's rights view that men are considered, by government and society, to be more expendable than women, Men's rights advocates, for example, target sex-specific military conscription and judicial practices that discriminate against men in child custody cases, Interdisciplinary Gender Studies, Men's Collective Struggles for Gender Justice, Case of Antiviolence Activism, League for Men's Rights to protect the endangered existence of men, Men's Liberation and Men's Rights Movement's Discourse, Interrogating recuperative masculinity politics in schooling". International Journal of Inclusive Education, rejected the move to a more equal gender order and more equal gender regimes in all of the major institutions of society, Fathers' Rights, Men's rights groups go mainstream, Engaging men in prevention of violence against women, Are You Man Enough for the Men's Rights Movement?, Feminism is a sexual strategy, online men’s rights group, Fatherhood Politics in the United States: Masculinity, Sexuality, Race, and Marriage. Urbana, Despite their claims of victimhood, men's and fathers' rights advocates are usually white, middle-class, heterosexual men who tend to overlook their institutional and socioeconomical advantages in work and the family, Men's movement, Reverse Discrimination Cases and the Men's Rights Movement, Men engaging feminisms: pro-feminism, backlashes and schooling, Articulation of Men's Rights, Women, Gender and Everyday Social Transformation in India, men's rights groups claim that the family law system and the Family Court are biased against men, despite the lack of supporting empirical research, Men and gender relations, it is usually disaffected fathers and men's rights groups, who have masked their own claims behind the rhetoric of the rights of the child to know and be cared for by both parents, Male and female circumcision medical, legal, and ethical considerations in pediatric practice, Is infant male circumcision an abuse of the rights of the child, Have Anti-Father Family Court Policies Led to a Men's Marriage Strike, The Marriage Strike: why men don't marry". Men on Strike: Why Men Are Boycotting Marriage, Fatherhood, and the American Dream-And Why It Matters, men's rights advocacy groups use family conflict research .. to eliminate laws defining marital rape as a crime (the Equal Justice Foundation, Equality with a Vengeance: Men's Rights Groups, Battered Women, and Antifeminist Backlash, Gender Symmetry" in Domestic Violence, Indeed the premise of all men's rights literature is that men are not privileged relative to women... Having denied that men are privileged relative to women, this movement divides into those who believe that men and women are equally harmed by sexism and those who believe that society has become a bastion of female privilege and male degradation, father's custody rights, Feminism Has Created Progress, , Who's the father? Rethinking the moral ‘crime’ of ‘paternity fraud’". Women's Studies International Forum, Women and Technologies of Reproduction, The myth behind paternity fraud, Sex Contract Shares Intimate Knowledge, Anti-Feminism, False Rape Accusations May Be More Common Than Thought, The New Politics of Masculinity: Men, Power and Resistance, Are You Man Enough for the Men's Rights Movement?
Mahatma
Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"
Atur Chatur says, "WHAT
YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"
Hope this will help you
guys....................all the best
Issued in Public Interest by
ATUR CHATUR COUNSELLING *
शादी से पहले और शादी के बाद
ATUR CHATUR को रखना याद
ATUR CHATUR को रखना याद
Email:- aturchatur@yahoo.com
NOTE:- Advise available for all countries laws vis-a-vis adultery & divorce so if you want divorce from your adulterous wife & want to have Consultation with ATUR CHATUR by paying him the consultation fees then contact him at +91-9873540498 & must also leave an email at ATURCHATUR@YAHOO.COM
DISCLAIMER & TERMS & CONDITIONS
*Disclaimer:-
Atur Chatur is my pen name. I am Delhi University Ex-Lecturer. I am NOT a
lawyer. I am a PIP (Party-in-Person). I filed Perjury (fraud on court) on lies
of my wife with proofs. I filed court case against Police/CAW. I filed
complaint against Judge Family Court (JFC) due to unethical practices/ gender
discrimination which resulted in JFC Recusal. I also became a RTI Activist. I
acquired all other knowledge/info after false 498a/DVC/Divorce/ CAW cases were
filed against me & entire family & my income greatly affected so I have
chosen this profession to support my family & also to support my one man
fight against gender discrimination in India. Counselling Fees = 2,000 only for
approx one hour talking to you & suggesting you few methods like RTI or
other methods which is based on my knowledge which I acquired while fighting
false cases. Fees is subject to change due to urgency & other factors so
please confirm. I do not provide legal opinion/ legal advise or anything like
that. All written by me & my suggestions etc is my personal views. You
yourself will be responsible for acting on any of my counseling/ advises /
consult / guidance etc. Fees for the RTI & any other writing work is to be
paid separately & does not come under counselling fees. Pls ask the fees
before getting any work done. Fees once paid (even if paid in excess) are not
refundable under any circumstances. I do not provide legal opinion/ legal
advise or anything like that. All written by me & views/ writings/ RTI/
suggestions/ counselling guidance etc are my personal views. You yourself will
be responsible for acting on any of my counselling/ advises / consult / guidance
etc. The author and his family haven't bribed any public official nor have they
given in to the extortion. This blog aims to raise awareness of due process in
India. The content of this blog constitutes, opinions, observations, and
publicly available documents. The intent is not to slander or defame anyone or
any institution and is the manifestation of the author's right to freedom of
expression – with all the protections this right guarantees. There has been no
advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement
of any sort whatsoever from us or any of our members to solicit any work
through this website. The user wishes to gain more information about us for
his/her own information and use. The information about us is provided to the user
only his/her specific request and any information obtained or materials
downloaded from this website is completely at the user's volition and any
transmission, receipt or use of this site would not create any lawyer-client
relationship. The information provided under this website is solely available
at your request for information purposed only, should not be interpreted as
soliciting or advertisement. We are not liable for any consequence of any
action taken by the user relying on legal material/information provided under
this website. In cases where the user has any legal dowry consultation issues,
he/she in all cases must seek independent legal advice from his own reliable sources & contacts.
Disputes if any shall be subject to Delhi Jurisdiction only. General Disclaimer
applies.
